1. © CBA 2012

2. This is the list of options being considered. In this case which vendor to select. This is the criteria for the selection (what it is important to consider) To assess the vendors based on the cost of their bids we select the Cost criteria We now see the vendors listed in preferred order based on cost To assess the vendors based on cost AND a rating of the company we add the Vendor criteria Note the order of the Vendors: 1.QQR Ltd 2.McDougalls 3.Big Biz 4.ABC Consulting With the new criteria added McDougalls is now the most preferred vendor Factors we wish to minimise Factors we wish to maximise Items in the display are split into two categories divided by a centre line The black triangles indicate the total net score for each Vendor Now we will include the assessment of the Vendors solution Note how the triangles have moved and the order of preferred vendors has changed again We will also add the assessment of the Vendors readiness to implement their solution We can see how much the order of preferred vendors has changed as we have considered more of the criteria The solution allows you to both focus on specific areas and quickly and easily build up a complete picture that would be too complex to do manually – we can select All Criteria to view © 2012 CBA StrategicIT Ltd

3. The visualisation of priorities also gives you information about your total portfolio The information shown here tells us that if all projects (100%) are included in this portfolio the total Expenses are $39,836,820 The total Financial Benefits are $81,675,000 If we only have a total budget of $20,000,000 we can see we can not afford to undertake every project The system uses order and colour coding to indicate the priority of our projects GREEN indicates the third of projects with the highest priority based on the selected criteria YELLOW indicates the middle third of projects based on priority RED indicates the bottom third of projects based on priority We can see the effects of removing a project from our portfolio by deselecting (unticking) projects To try and reduce the expenses to fit within our $20,000,000 budget we have removed all of the lowest priority projects. We can see the Expenses have reduced by 42% to $22,963,400 This is still much too high given our budget We could simply continue removing the lowest priority projects until the Expenses fall below $20,000,000 However this may lead to unintended consequences For example we can see this has also reduced the Financial Benefits by 53%, reducing them from $81,675,000 to $38,454,500 The system allows us to selectively choose which mix of projects to include in our portfolio, showing us instantly what the impact will be By including this mix of projects in our portfolio we have reduced our expenses by 51% to under $20,000,000 but have kept 64% ($52,178,500) of the potential financial benefit © 2012 CBA StrategicIT Ltd iVis software enables you to visualise value and trade-offs from various stakeholders - viewing where stakeholders agree and disagree. Take a look at all the Trade-offs within the portfolio

4. This is the screen used for gaining subjective input from people Two of the options being considered are shown side by side Option 1 Option 2 The detail of the option is available for review Subjective input is made by answering the question being asked about the two options. The answer is given using the scale at the bottom of the screen. The question The scale If the option on the left was considered to carry the greatest political risk the person answering the question would click on one of the scale options on the left. If the option on the right was considered to carry the greatest political risk the person answering the question would click on one of the scale options on the right. If both options are considered to carry the same political risk the person answering the question would click on the centre scale option. If the option on the left is considered to carry slightly higher political risk one of the central scale options would be selected. If the option on the left is considered to carry significantly higher political risk one of the outside scale options would be selected. The position on the scale indicates the strength of the answer. The system keeps track of how many comparisons it needs in order to determine the priority of all the options. You do not have to do every possible combination of comparisons. The system is smart enough to be able to infer comparisons. For example if you say a dog is bigger than a cat, and a cat is bigger than a mouse, the system knows a dog must be bigger than a mouse – you do not have to tell it. The system keeps track of the minimum number of comparisons it needs to generate results, but also recommends an amount to ensure the greatest validity. The minimum required The recommended amount The number already completed For the two options shown it has been determined that the Ongoing centre development carrys moderately greater political risk Once the selection has been made, clicking the [OK] button will show the next two options to compare Note the number of comparisons made now equals the recommended number. The system now says we have done enough to view the results. The system keeps track of all the comparisons that have been made.The system also keeps track of the progress across all of the criteria. As shown previously, enough comparisons have been made for Political Risk (as shown by the green progress bar) The other criteria requiring subjective input have enough comparisons to show results, but more comparisons would make them more reliable. © 2012 CBA StrategicIT Ltd

5. © CBA 2012 iVis has many other features that deliver a high degree of capability and visibility to an organisation. Following are some examples and screenshots of some of these aspects. Pick the Winners © CBA 2012 Allocation of Resources against a timeline The project road map shows the projects over time. The target dates define the length and sections of the bars. The histogram shows the demand over time, per resource profile. The red threshold line shows the total supply over time. © 2012 CBA © CBA 2012

6. Unique solutions to use and so have competitive advantage in the market World class software tools backed by IBM already developed for specific needs to help with the biggest issues Senior Managers have today High Visibility over your projects and your business Making smarter, more transparent decisions, prioritising investments to maximise stakeholder value and support the organisations vision Demonstrate accountability to external stakeholders Have insight with great accuracy so it enables better investment decisions Have a bigger picture of your enterprise Understand the impact and risks of change and find new opportunities Anticipate the effects of change Make the best investments for your organisation in real time Have better up-to-date knowledge of your organisation Quantify impacts and risks of selecting one investment over another

7. © CBA 2012