1. International Technical Assistance to Regional Development in Ukraine
Overview of RD related programmes and projects under implementation
Olexander TSEPKO
December 2015

2. Purpose of the Overview :
To serve as:
Information Source on current inputs from donor community to the regional development in Ukraine
Planning Tool for coming the TA projects in more coordinated manner.

3. The overview highlights:
GEORGAPHIC LOCATION OF DONOR INPUTS
NUMBER OF PROJECTS AND ALLOCATED FUNDS PER DONOR
NUMBER OF PROJECTS AND ALLOCATED FUNDS PER SECTOR
NUMBER OF PROJECTS AND ALLOCATED FUNDS PER REGION
PROJECT FUNDS PER CAPITA

4. Methodology: Acronyms & Grouping of Sectors
A&RD - Agriculture and Rural Development
CS - Communal Services, incl. waste, water, heating
C&T - Culture and Tourism
ED&SMEs - Economic Development, incl. SMEs and Entrepreneurship
Ed&Sc – Education and Science
Gov.- incl. decentralization, PFM
IR&T – Infrastructure, roads and transport
LM&E – Labour markets and Employment
MM&I – Mass Media and Access to Information

5. Methodology: Sectors covered
Administrative Services
A&RD
Communal Services
Culture & Tourism
CSOs
Economic Development & SMEs
Education & Science
Employment and Labour Markets
Energy and EE
Environment
Governance
Health Care
Human Rights & Gender
IDPs
Infrastructure
IMC
Mass Media
PPP
RD Strategy
Social Services
Urban Development

6. Methodology: not considered
defense and nuclear safety as well as projects focusing exclusively at improvements of public authorities at central level, legal harmonization and approximation

7. Methodology: miscellaneous
Time frames:
Only projects with life time beyond analysed
Regional presence:
Only projects with one or more recipient in the regions
Reference source:
Only project officially registered by MEDT of Ukraine
Main Sources:
Projects, donor organizations, beneficiaries and recipients web sites
Currency conversion: OANDA rates from 5

8. The map

9. The map: legend

10. The map: hyperlinks
Support to Decentralisation in Ukraine (48); Rule of Law in Local Administration (49); Gender Budgeting in Ukraine (50)
Press Ctrl and click

11. The map: hyperlinks

12. Number of projects per donor The leading donors: EU -72, USA-22, Canada -11 projects

13. Funds allocated per donor Top 3 donors: USA Canada-85.9, EU M EUR Germany leading as bilateral donor – 32.4 M EUR

14. Number of projects per sector Highest: E&EE- 22, culture and tourism-17, IDPs-15 Lowest: IMC-1 project, MM&I-2, Urban development -3, environment-3

15. Funds allocated per sector Highest: agriculture and rural development (59.3 M EUR), followed by Energy (56,5), Human Rights &Gender(45,9 M EUR). Lowest: TA to infrastructure projects (0,25 MEUR), followed by social services (0,4 M EUR) and by inter-municipal cooperation (0,7 M EUR).

16. Number of projects per Region Leaders: Lvivs’ka Oblast -8
Number of projects per Region Leaders: Lvivs’ka Oblast -8.96%, K and Kyivivs’ka Oblast-6,97%, and by Volyns’ka Oblast (6.77%). Outsiders: Kirovohrads’ka %, Chernivetska-1.25%, Zhytomyrs’ka Oblast -1.93%

17. Allocation per Region Leaders: Dnipropetrovs’ka Oblast -46
Allocation per Region Leaders: Dnipropetrovs’ka Oblast M EUR, Kyiv City and Kyivs’ka M EUR and Lvivs’ka Oblast 28.8 M EUR Outsiders: Cherkas’ka Oblast -9.4 M EUR, Kirovohraska-9.8 M EUR, followed by Kharkivs’ka and AR Krym 10.7 M EUR each

18. Funds per Capita Highest ratio in: in Khersons’ka Oblast -17
Funds per Capita Highest ratio in: in Khersons’ka Oblast -17.9, Chernivets’ka Poltavs’ka Oblast Lowest in: Kharkivs’ka - 3.8, AR Krym - 5.3, Cherkas’ka – 7.3

19. Ratio Project Funds per Capita

20. Projects Analyzed: List Structure

21. OVERVIEW of POSSIBLE UPDATES in the FUTURE:
Hosting at SURDP project web site as basis for follow up updates, e.g. twice a year;
Archive of the overviews of previous years as opportunity for analyses;
Additional chapter on coming projects (based on official forecasts of donors concerned)
Any further suggestion???

22. Thank you for your attention.
Questions?
Olexander TSEPKO