Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKatherine Hall Modified over 6 years ago
1
Addressing address quality in public health surveillance data
Kate Zinszer
2
Infectious disease surveillance in Canada
Reportable diseases List of diseases that are of significant public health importance Laboratories submit reports to the regional public health office (fax, electronically) Information entered into a database & extracted for monitoring and potential intervention
3
Public health surveillance
Orient data in terms of person, place, and time Detect high-risk groups, spatial and temporal clusters Residential location of case Assumption of being true residential location This assumption has never been investigated in public health surveillance data Source: Jones et al. Nature 2009
4
Study objectives To determine the prevalence of address errors for all reportable diseases in Montreal To determine if these errors have the potential to impact surveillance findings
5
Methods Extracted all reportable disease records from the Montreal public health department from 1 January to 31 December 2008 No demographic information Temporal and spatial information Location information: street name, street number, and postal code
6
Applied an address correcting algorithm
Exact match: No editing needed (valid match) Recoverable address error: does not match the Canada Post file ‘De Lorimmier’ would be corrected to ‘De Lorimier’ Unprocessable error: missing critical pieces of information
7
Methods Determined the prevalence of address errors for reportable diseases Examined the impact of address errors for cases of campylobacter: Obtained (x,y) coordinates for postal codes Calculated straight line (Euclidian) distance moved for those with ‘recoverable’ address errors (x,y) (x,y)
8
Methods Calculated the cumulative incidence rates of campylobacter
By subregion (FSA) Using the original address and ‘corrected’ address Calculated absolute rate differences Simulated increased address error prevalence
9
Results & Discussion
20
Conclusions Address errors are a prevalent problem in surveillance data This results in significant positional errors, which impacts surveillance findings Next step is to determine impact on cluster detection using SaTScan and Bayesian methods Limitations Address corrections have not been not validated Simulation is based upon address error distribution for cases of campylobacter in Montreal
21
Conclusions Space is an important component in surveillance and findings need to be communicated to public health practitioners and researchers Need to examine the extent of address errors in public health data Changes in practice can reduce these errors
22
Thank you David Buckeridge Katia Charland Christian Jauvin Aman Verma
Luc De Montigny Kevin Schwartzman Robert Allard Lucie Bedard Geoconnections
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.