1. [ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification Review
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
[ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification Review
for [RELATED ENTITIES] [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT]
[Presenter Name, Title]
Closing Presentation
[Month Day, Year]

2. Thanks [Thanks to Entity Management]
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
Thanks
[Thanks to Entity Management]
[Thanks to Entity Certification Review Team]
[Thanks to ???????]

3. Topics to Review Certification Review Process and Team Members
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
Topics to Review
Certification Review Process and Team Members
Positives
Bucket Items
Post Certification Review Tentative Timeline and Reminders
Feedback
Questions and Answers

4. Standards Reviewed [Standard 1 i.e. EOP-008-0] [Standard Title]
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
Standards Reviewed
[Standard 1 i.e. EOP-008-0] [Standard Title]
[Standard 2 ] [Standard Title]
[Standard 3 ] [Standard Title]
[Standard 4 ] [Standard Title]
[Standard 5 ] [Standard Title]
[Standard 6 ] [Standard Title]
[Standard … ] [Standard Title]

5. NERC (BA) (RC) (TOP) Certification Review
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
NERC (BA) (RC) (TOP) Certification Review
Certification Review Process
Performed Per the NERC Rules of Procedure Section 500 and Appendix 5A
The Certification Review Team
[Team Leader 1 (CTL)] [Company affiliation]
[Team Member 2] [Company affiliation]
[Team Member 3] [Company affiliation]
[Team Member 4] [Company affiliation]
[Team Member 5] [Company affiliation]
[Team Member 6] [Company affiliation]

6. [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
Positives
Practice that will support/improve the reliability of the BES

7. [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
Positives (Cont.)
Practice that will support/improve the reliability of the BES

8. This slide is for info only
Use one of the next two slides.

9. Bucket 1 Items Bucket 1 Items
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
Bucket 1 Items
Bucket 1 Items
Certification Review Team recommends a full certification based on the following conclusions:
1st Issue – Based on the following evidence
2nd Issue – Based on the following evidence
3rd Issue – Based on the following evidence

10. Bucket 1 Items Bucket 1 Items
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
Bucket 1 Items
Bucket 1 Items
There were no issues the Certification Review Team found that would prevent a recommendation of certification review approval.

11. [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
Bucket 2 Items
The following items must be closed prior to certification review approval:
Issue – Evidence required

12. Bucket 2 Items (Cont.) Issue – Evidence required
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
Bucket 2 Items (Cont.)
Issue – Evidence required

13. [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
Bucket 3 Items
The following items are suggestions the Entity might consider to improve reliability and/or performance:
Suggestion
These will not be included in the Final Summary Report

14. Bucket 3 Items (Cont.) Suggestion
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
Bucket 3 Items (Cont.)
Suggestion

15. Post Certification Review Tentative Timeline
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
Post Certification Review Tentative Timeline
NOTE: following dates are anticipated and subject to change
Closure of all Bucket 2 items by [Date]
A draft report will be provided to [Entity Name] by [Date After bucket 2 items closed]
[Entity Name] to review draft report and return by [Date]
If [Entity Name] disagrees with the CRT conclusions, this should be communicated in writing immediately to NERC and clearly state the reasons for disagreement.

16. Post Certification Review Tentative Timeline (Cont)
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
Post Certification Review Tentative Timeline (Cont)
The final Summary Report, with [Entity Name]’s comments included where appropriate, will be reviewed by [REGIONAL ENTITY] management and upon approval, transmitted to [Entity Name] and submitted by [REGIONAL ENTITY] to NERC Approval by [DATE].
The official letter confirming that a full certification is not required will be submitted [ENTITY] by NERC on [DATE].
NERC Alert needs to be advised if a change in Registration is effected.

17. [Entity Name] Feedback
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
[Entity Name] Feedback
[Entity Name]’s feedback of the Certification Review process is sincerely requested. The ERO strives for continuous improvement, and tracks and reviews all feedback.
Feedback forms will be provided via .
Please be candid when filling in the forms whether it is comments regarding the process, the feedback forms and/or the CRT performance.
Note that the feedback does not require naming the author of the feedback.
Please return the completed form to [RE ] as soon as possible.

18. [INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITIES NAME/LOGO]
Questions and Answers