Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJean-Marie Moreau Modified over 6 years ago
1
State of the ART: Integrase Inhibitor Resistance
Jeroen van Kampen Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2
disclosures Jeroen van Kampen Companies/funders
Sponsoring or research fee Inventor on patent “Methods for determining antibiotic resistance in microorganisms” ( – 1408 / ) EU project EHVA (#681032) Erasmus MC (patent holder), Bruker Daltonics (licence)
3
HIV life cycle Volberding et al., Lancet, 2010
4
HIV DNA integration Adapted by Clavel from Craigie & Bushman, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 2012
5
integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI)
Poonvaganam et al., RSC Adv, 2014; Thierry et al., Front Microbiol, 2017
6
First generation INSTI
raltegravir (RAL) elvitegravir (EVG)
7
Resistance to first generation INSTI
Raltegravir FDA drug label 40% (4/10) in ART naive 68% (76/112) in ART experienced Clinical practice 34% (97/285) 26% in ART naive (8/31) Elvitegravir 71.8% (191/266) ± 40% (14/35) in ART naive 43% (52/122) 38% in ART naive (6/16) RAL FDA label naive STARTMRK studies RAL FDA label experienced BENCHMARK studies Clinical practice: French ANRS network. Observational multi-center study. N = 513 (VF 2x > 50 c/mL). ANRS interpretation algorithm EVG FDA drug label naive 102 & 103 studies. Minimum 14/35 and max 18/35 with EVG-RAM. Isentress FDA drug label.; Marcelin et al., presentation # O_#03, European HIV clinical forum, Milan, Italy, 2017.; Stribild FDA drug label
8
RAL resistance pathways
Spach et al., national HIV curriculum, 2017
9
EVG resistance pathways
10
Cross-resistance RAL and EVG
Gerretti ed, antiretroviral resistance in clinical practice; Quashie et al., Curr Opin infect Dis, 2013
11
Raltegravir – accumulation of resistance mutations
Hatano et al., J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 2010; Spach et al., national HIV curriculum, 2017
12
Elvitegravir – accumulation of resistance mutations
Winters et al., plos one, 2012
13
Accumulation of resistance mutations over time
Canducci et al., J Infect Dis, 2011
14
Second generation INSTI
dolutegravir (DTG) bictegravir (BIC) cabotegravir (CAB)
15
Resistance to second generation INSTI
DTG FDA drug label 0% (0/9) in ART naive 21% (6/28) in ART experienced Clinical practice 0% (0/6) in ART naive 15% (16/106) for DTG o.d. 6% (6/106) for DTG b.i.d. DTG dual therapy ? DTG monotherapy 40% (4/10) 82% (9/11) BIC 0% (0/8) in ART naive 0% (0/1) in ART experienced CAB Tivicay FDA drug label.; Marcelin et al., presentation # O_#03, European HIV clinical forum, Milan, Italy, 2017.; Wijting et al., J Infect Dis, 2018.; Blanco et al., CROI 2017, abstract 42.; Biktarvy FDA drug label
16
Genetic barrier to resistance
Clutter et al., Infect Genet Evol, 2016
17
Cross-resistance RAL/EVG and DTG
Quashie et al., Curr Opin infect Dis, 2013
18
VIKING-3 study DTG b.i.d. in RAL/EVG resistant HIV infection
Resistance against RAL/EVG + ≥ 2 drug classes 1 fully active drug in optimized backbone regimen HIV-RNA < 50 c/mL at week 24 No Q148 100/126 (79%) Q mutation 21/36 (58%) Q148 + ≥ 2 mutations 5/21 (24%) Castagna et al., J Infect Dis, 2014
19
Resistance: 1st generation vs 2nd generation INSTI
Smith et al., retrovirology, 2018
20
Resistance: 1st generation vs 2nd generation INSTI
Smith et al., retrovirology, 2018
21
INSTI resistance – are we looking in the wrong place?
22
INSTI resistance outside integrase 3' polypurine tract (PPT)
In vitro selection experiments under high DTG concentrations 3' polypurine tract (PPT) HXB2_ref A G 9053 Lai* C T - Malet et al., mBio, 2017
23
Wijting et al., J Infect Dis, 2018
4 6 10 1 2 3 9 8 5 7 DOMONO study main pilot adherence > 95% DTG level at VF 1.29 (+14h) 2.00 (+19h) 5.31 2.59 (+16h) 2.96 (+22h) 1.00 (+24h) 0.86 1.44 0.70 (+13h) 2.15 (+9h) INSTI-RAM no - S230R E92Q + N155H R263K N155H Wijting et al., J Infect Dis, 2018
24
First patient failing on INSTI with development of mutations in 3’-PPT
No INSTI-RAMs detected! 3' polypurine tract (PPT) HXB2_ref A G 9053 Lai* C T - Pat 10 Wijting et al., J Infect Dis, 2018
25
Summary First generation INSTI Raltegravir, elvitegravir
Resistance relatively common upon virologic failure Cross resistance between RAL and EVG Second generation INSTI Dolutegravir, bictegravir, cabotegravir Resistance relatively uncommon upon virologic failure But not with monotherapy! Activity against RAL/EVG resistant HIV isolates Q148 + additional mutations poor response Resistance outside integrase Resistance via 3’-polypurine tract Role in vivo to be determined
26
Factors associated with resistance
Lepik et al., aids, 2017
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.