1. Bobby Deaver Dupont Antioch Maintenance/Production Worker
Zampa vs Georgia-Pacific et al.
March 29, 2017

2. Dupont told him in 1962 that asbestos causes cancer

3. Dupont told him (maintenance/production) in 1962 about hazard of take-home asbestos

4. He was assigned a locker during his first days of work; doesn’t know if Construction employees were assigned lockers p

5. Does not know if all of Antioch’s ~600 employees received lockers (1960s)

6. Did not witness Dupont’s having told construction workers re: take-home risk

7. During the 1960s he received annual training re: asbestos and cancer
During the 1960s he received annual training re: asbestos and cancer. Does not remember signage with this warning p

8. Does not remember that Dupont told him about cancer from substances other than asbestos

9. In the 1960s, Production employees attended monthly safety meetings at which asbestos was discussed.
Was not told that only certain craftsmen were at risk for cancer caused by asbestos p

10. Change of testimony…
p , 56-59

11. Change of testimony: Was told that the reason for change of clothing was tetraethyl leadp

12. Change of testimony: Doesn’t know when he knew about asbestos as a cause of cancerp

13. Change of testimony: Can not say when is the earliest date that Dupont took action to prevent asbestos and cancer. … p

14. No evidence that Dupont Construction employees were told to change clothes before going home

15. Change of clothes and showers was to prevent asbestos from being taken home.

16. Conversation re: asbestos and take-homep