1. Stakeholders engagement in urban freight projects: the design and monitoring framework
Schoemaker, Laparidou, Oesterle, Menge, Aditjandra,
Vaghi, Zunder, Leonardi, Carnaby

2. PPP in urban freight: FQP
City authorities
Residents
Visitors
Retails/Shops
Business entities
Business associations
Freight shippers
Universities/Colleges, etc.

3. Logical Framework Approach
Identify problem(s)
Identify key stakeholders
Clarify their interests
Comprehend their perception
Specify their resources
Outline their mandate
Source: ADB, 2007

4. Road to Logframe – a DMF Matrix
Source: ADB, 2007

5. Como: a city of high touristic attraction with the revitalisation of “Merci in Centro” and LTZ agenda
Top map is Como convalle issues
Bottom city map is the geographic coverage of the LTZ illustrated in red and green; the area in red indicates the città murata, i.e. the inner historical centre.
Source: Como City Council and Google Earth

6. Limited Traffic Zone (LTZ) and “Merci in Centro” – Focused
DMF process in Como
Completed stakeholder template interest by key stakeholders (certainly in Italian)
Alternative analysis during round table discussion – first round consultation process with key stakeholders
Stakeholder consultation analysis presentation
Workshop 1
October
Workshop 2
February 2013
Problem Tree
Roundtable 1
November 2012
DMF Matrix
March
Public Consultation on urban freight
Key stakeholders roundtable discussions
Limited Traffic Zone (LTZ) and “Merci in Centro” – Focused
Constructed from Workshop 2 Output
Roundtable 2
December 2012
Revitalisation of “Merci in Centro”
Limited Traffic Zone regulation (LTZ)

7. Problem Tree – Cause I

8. Berlin: capital of Germany with an enforced environmental zone with “BEHALA” use agenda
Green sticker ratio increased by 40% for Heavy Goods Vehicles
Source: Berlin Senate Department for Urban Development and Environment

9. Performance Targets / indicators Data sources / Reporting Mechanisms
Berlin DMF Matrix
Design Summary
Performance Targets / indicators
Data sources / Reporting Mechanisms
Assumptions / Risks
Uptake of alternative and electric vehicles in urban freight transport in Berlin.
Increased number of (hybrid-) electric vehicles in the City of berlin for freight.
Vehicle registrations;
Traffic data sources, e.g. traffic counts (that allow distinction between propulsion type).
A: Continuing support for urban freight policy; Acceptance by cargo receivers;
R: Change of governance with lack of political support; Failure to convince commercial players of the commercial viability of the solution.
Supportive political framework;
Improving market conditions;
Implementing vehicle telematics solutions.
Number of accepted measures;
Lower life cycle costs for HEV/EVs;
Create successful HEV with IT solutions prototype.
Municipality regulation (city website);
Study reports and company quotations on life cycle cost;
Study reports and company quotations on benefits of IT solutions.
A: Accepted regulatory framework; R: Failure to pass legal or political requirements for regulation
A: Considering all factors for calculating life cycle costs;
A: Successful implementation; R: Unexpected delays during the implementation phase.
Political framework setting;
Demonstration of the commercial viability;
Demonstration of environmental benefits.
Number of suggested policies;
Lower transport cost/km; increased volume transported by HEV;
Lower noise level; better air quality; lower CO2; lower fuel consumption.
Official publications on policy and specific measures;
Operator cost statements and transport reports;
Results on noise and local air pollution metering or modelling results; Operator statements on fuel consumption; citizen feedback and media reflections.
A: there will be measures to support uptake of HEV; R: limited political will (e.g. gas lobbies)
A: Successful test; R: Not commercially viable uncertainty; R: missing monitoring indicators.
A: Environmental benefit achieved.
Impact
Outcome
Output

10. Newcastle: a medium size compact historic city – a University town with green agenda via City FQP, UCC, LEZ
Source: Tyne & Wear Local Transport Plan

11. Logframe outputs - Interventions
Clean Vehicles
Correctly Parked Freight Vehicles
Co-ordinated freight deliveries
A - Better signage & Delivery Maps
B - Supplier Self-consolidation
C – Urban Consolidation Centre
D - University Consolidation Centre
E - Sustainable Catering Initiatives
11/24/2018
Smartfusion

12. CONCLUSIONS City logistics and sustainability via PPP
Adoption of clean urban freight technologies
Logical Framework Approach in DMF form
Engagement of different stakeholders from the very beginning
Modification of practices in DMF process
Future research on evaluation of the DMF implementation

13. NewRail Freight & Logistics Research Group, Newcastle University, UK
Contact details
NewRail Freight & Logistics Research Group, Newcastle University, UK
Thomas H Zunder FCILT MCIPS
Dr Paulus T Aditjandra MCILT MCIHT
Bruce Carnaby
24/11/2018
Smartfusion