Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Wave Equation Traveltime Inversion

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Wave Equation Traveltime Inversion"— Presentation transcript:

1 Wave Equation Traveltime Inversion

2 Outline Implicit Function Theorem Wave Equation Traveltime Tomography
Examples Generalization Summary 1

3 Implicit Function Theorem f(x,y,z)=0
Given: f(x,y,z)=0 Find: ∂z/∂x and ∂z∕∂y ∂f∕∂y ∂f∕∂x ∂f∕∂z ∂z∕∂x = - ; ∂z∕∂y = - Example: x2 + y2 + z2 = sin(xy) Analogous to seismic inversion problem, A is the forward modeling operator, m is the velocity model, and d is the seismogram. Because A is a nonlinear operator, the misfit function is nonlinear too and has a lot of local minima. S1: f(x,y,z)=x2 + y2 + z2 - sin(xy)=0 S2: ∂z∕∂y = -(2y-zcos(yz))/[2z-ycos(yz)]

4 Implicit Function Theorem for f(c,dT)
This means that Frechet derivative Of ∂data/∂model can be found even if there isnt a PDE with data and model. All you need is a functional equal to zero that depends on data and model. Analogous to seismic inversion problem, A is the forward modeling operator, m is the velocity model, and d is the seismogram. Because A is a nonlinear operator, the misfit function is nonlinear too and has a lot of local minima. f=1 f=2 f=0.5 dT C(dT) f(c,dT) ▼f(c,dT) (dc,ddT)= dr ▼f(c,dT)◦dr =0 along contour

5 Outline Implicit Function Theorem Wave Equation Traveltime Tomography
Examples Generalization Summary 1

6 Problem and Solution Problem: FWI requires accurate starting model, sometimes RT tomogram not accurate enough. Wave equation Frechet derivative (not ray-based) Solution: Need WT tomogram: s(x)(k+1) = s(x)(k) - a S∂Ti ∕∂c(x)[∆Ti] i However: Unlike data P and model c, which enjoy a PDE to get ∂P∕∂c we don’t have a PDE which connects data dT and model c Step 1: Temporal correlation function between predicted and observed seismograms: f(c,dT) = P(g,t)pred. P(g,t)obs. Step 2: At correct lag T*, f(c,dT*) = 0 = P(g,t)pred. P(g,t)obs. Analogous to seismic inversion problem, A is the forward modeling operator, m is the velocity model, and d is the seismogram. Because A is a nonlinear operator, the misfit function is nonlinear too and has a lot of local minima. dT*

7 Problem and Solution Problem: FWI requires accurate starting model, sometimes RT tomogram not accurate enough. Wave equation Frechet derivative (not ray-based) Solution: Need WT tomogram: s(x)(k+1) = s(x)(k) - a S∂Ti ∕∂c(x)[∆Ti] i However: Unlike data P and model c, which enjoy a PDE to get ∂P∕∂c we don’t have a PDE which connects data dT and model c Step 1: Temporal correlation function between predicted and observed seismograms: f(c,dT) = P(g,t)pred. P(g,t)obs. Step 2: At correct lag T*, f(c,dT*) = 0 = P(g,t)pred. P(g,t)obs. T=dT* Analogous to seismic inversion problem, A is the forward modeling operator, m is the velocity model, and d is the seismogram. Because A is a nonlinear operator, the misfit function is nonlinear too and has a lot of local minima. f(c,dT*)=0 dT* dT(c) C f(c,dT)

8 Problem and Solution Problem: FWI requires accurate starting model, sometimes RT tomogram not accurate enough. Wave equation Frechet derivative (not ray-based) Solution: Need WT tomogram: s(x)(k+1) = s(x)(k) - a S∂Ti ∕∂c(x)[∆Ti] i However: Unlike data P and model c, which enjoy a PDE to get ∂P∕∂c we don’t have a PDE which connects data T and model c Step 1: Temporal correlation function between predicted and observed seismograms: f(c,dT) = P(g,t)pred. P(g,t)obs. Step 2: At correct lag T*, f(c,dT*) = 0 = P(g,t)pred. P(g,t)obs. ∂c(x) T=dT* ∂f/∂T Step 3: ∂T/∂c = - ∂f/∂c Analogous to seismic inversion problem, A is the forward modeling operator, m is the velocity model, and d is the seismogram. Because A is a nonlinear operator, the misfit function is nonlinear too and has a lot of local minima. ∂P(g,t)pred.∕∂c(x)=2G(g,t|x,0)*P(x,t|s,0)/c(x)3. where ∂f(g,s)/∂c(x) = - ∫dt∂P(g,t)pred./∂c P(g,t+T*)obs. SP(g,t)pred. P(g,t+T*)obs. ∂f/∂T = t E =

9 Summary Wave equation Frechet derivative (not ray-based) Solution: Need WT tomogram: s(x)(k+1) = s(x)(k) - a S∂Ti ∕∂c(x)[dTi] i Trace summation Step 1: Connective Function: correlation of predicted and observed seismograms: f(c,dT*) = 0 = SP(g,t)pred. P(g,t+T*)obs. t Step 2: At correct lag T*, f(c,dT*) = 0 = P(g,t)pred. P(g,t)obs. 2/c(x)3 S [G(g,t|x,0)*P(x,t|s,0)]P(g,t+T*)obs. i t = ∂f/ ∂T Step 3: ∂T/∂c = - ∂f /∂c E Migration kernel (wavepath) ith trace dT* Analogous to seismic inversion problem, A is the forward modeling operator, m is the velocity model, and d is the seismogram. Because A is a nonlinear operator, the misfit function is nonlinear too and has a lot of local minima. SP(g,t)pred. P(g,t+T*)obs. E = t i s(x)(k+1) = s(x)(k) - a S∂Ti ∕∂c(x)[dTi] Step 4: i => s(x)(k) dTi Single trace S [G(g ,t|x,0)*P(x,t|s,0)]P(g ,t+T*)obs. i t Migration kernel (wavepath) WT=RTM of dt weighted trace Traveltime weighted trace

10 Outline Implicit Function Theorem Wave Equation Traveltime Tomography
Examples Generalization Summary 1

11 Fault Model Model WT (10 it) WTW (14 it) RT 1

12 Fault Model Data + Noise
Noisy Data WTW (14 it) 1

13 Friendswood Data Noisy Data Wavelet Median Data FK Down 1

14 Friendswood WTW 1

15 Friendswood WTW vs Sonic
1

16 Friendswood WTW vs Sonic
1

17 Outline Implicit Function Theorem Wave Equation Traveltime Tomography
Examples Generalization Summary 1

18 Wave Eqn Inversion Semblance Panels
1

19 Wave Eqn Inversion Surface Waves
1

20 Wave Eqn Inversion Surface Waves
1

21 Frequency Domain Inversion
e=S(Ai(w)peak - Ai(w)peak)2 ~ i predicted observed e=S(wpeak - wpeak)2 i ~ WQT 1 s z MQA

22 Outline Implicit Function Theorem Wave Equation Traveltime Tomography
Examples Generalization Summary 1

23 Summary Wave equation Frechet derivative (not ray-based) Solution: Need WT tomogram: s(x)(k+1) = s(x)(k) - a S∂Ti ∕∂c(x)[dTi] i Trace summation Step 1: Connective Function: correlation of predicted and observed seismograms: f(c,dT*) = 0 = SP(g,t)pred. P(g,t+T*)obs. t Step 2: At correct lag T*, f(c,dT*) = 0 = P(g,t)pred. P(g,t)obs. 2/c(x)3 S [G(g,t|x,0)*P(x,t|s,0)]P(g,t+T*)obs. i t = ∂f/ ∂T Step 3: ∂T/∂c = - ∂f /∂c E Migration kernel (wavepath) ith trace dT* Analogous to seismic inversion problem, A is the forward modeling operator, m is the velocity model, and d is the seismogram. Because A is a nonlinear operator, the misfit function is nonlinear too and has a lot of local minima. SP(g,t)pred. P(g,t+T*)obs. E = t i s(x)(k+1) = s(x)(k) - a S∂Ti ∕∂c(x)[dTi] Step 4: i => s(x)(k) dTi Single trace S [G(g ,t|x,0)*P(x,t|s,0)]P(g ,t+T*)obs. i t Migration kernel (wavepath) WT=RTM of dt weighted trace Traveltime weighted trace


Download ppt "Wave Equation Traveltime Inversion"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google