Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySudirman Budiaman Modified over 6 years ago
1
S52C-01 Outline of the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, Earthquakes and lessons for a large urban earthquake in Tokyo Metropolitan area Naoshi Hirata1, Aitaro Kato1, Kouji Makamura2, Yohei Hiyama3 1 Earthquake Research Institute, the University of Tokyo 2 , Japan Metrological Agency 3 Geospatial Information Authority of Japan 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
2
Tectonic setting Gray circles are epicenters of earthquakes with a depth < 60 km Blue stars are the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes MTL: Median Tectononic Line 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
3
Two large earthquakes with JMA seismic intensity 7 at Mashiki town in Kumamoto
The April 14, 2016 earthquake with Mjma 6.5 (Mw5.2) The April 16, 2016 earthquake with an Mjma=7.3 (Mw7.0) 7.3 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
4
Foreshock(Mj6.5) Main shock(Mj7.3) 28 hrs later 2016/12/16
AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
5
Totally destroyed houses: 8,364
Fatalities: 154 Totally destroyed houses: 8,364 (as of Dec.7, 2016) 2016, May 14th Naoshi town 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
6
2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
7
Cumulative number of earthquakes after each major inland event in japan (Mj ≧3.5)
2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
8
Foreshocks and Mainshock
2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
9
Foreshocks and Mainshock
2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
10
Surface faulting and known active faults
Right-lateral surface slip Along the Futagawa fault zone, about 30 km long, a series of surface faults are found. The maximum faulting is 2.2 m right-lateral slip at Mashiki town, Dozon area. 2016, May 14th Naoshi town 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
11
Assessment of the Futagawa fault zone in February 2013 by ERC
Along the Futagawa segment of the Futagawa fault zone, an earthquake with M7.0 may occur with a 2 m right-lateral slip. A chance of occurrence of the event is approximately 0 to 0.9% in 30 years. The segment is classified to belong to “fairly high possibility” group among about 100 prominent active faults. 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
12
Probability of M6.8+ in 30 years
Whole Kyushu: 30-42% North Central South Central Kyushu:18-20% Cumulative distribution Probability (%) © Earthquake Reserch Committee, Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (HERP) 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
13
208 Mj ≧ 7 earthquakes for 148 years (1868- 2016)
Cumulative number M-T 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
14
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment
Mashiki Town 28% Kumamoto City 14% Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment A chance of Japanese Seismic Intensity 6- or larger in 30 years: as of Jan Probability of earthquake occurence+ Site amplification Injury by traffic accidents: 24% Suffering from fire: 1.9% 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307 © HERP, ERC
15
New Guidelines for the Seismic Forecast Information after Big Earthquakes
JMA issued information about aftershock probability after the first big earthquake, which is based on guidelines determined by ERC (HERP) in 1998. ERC reformulates the guideline so that JMA calls attention to strong motion which is similar level to the first big earthquake for about one week after big earthquakes. After one week, if the active seismicity continues, JMA issues aftershock probability. The probability is shown by magnification ratio which compares to the probability just after the biggest earthquake and before the big earthquakes. 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
16
Summary The 2016 Kumamoto Earthquakes, Mj6.5 and Mj7.3, generate JMA Seismic Intensity 7 twice. Note that M7+ evets occur once or twice every year in and around Japan. More than 200 foreshocks and aftershocks occurred: the most active seismicity among in-land earthquakes in Japan. More than 150 were killed and 80,000 houses were totally destroyed by the events. The 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes occurred on assessed active fault segments in an area with a high probability. However, local people and, to some extent, local governments could not understand risks in the area. We need further effort to communicate risks to public and stakeholder. 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307 Basic comprehensive policy
17
End 2016/12/16 AGU 2016 S52C-01, Moscone South, 307
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.