Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Multiple Comparisons: Example

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Multiple Comparisons: Example"— Presentation transcript:

1 Multiple Comparisons: Example
Study Objective: Test the effect of six varieties of wheat to a particular race of stem rust. Treatment: Wheat Variety Levels: A(i=1), B (i=2), C (i=3), D (i=4), E (i=5), F (i=6) Experimental Unit: Pot of well mixed potting soil. Replication: Four (4) pots per treatment, four(4) plants per pot. Randomization: Varieties randomized to 24 pots (CRD) Response: Yield (Yij) (in grams) of wheat variety(i) at maturity in pot (j). Implementation Notes: Six seeds of a variety are planted in a pot. Once plants emerge, the four most vigorous are retained and inoculated with stem rust. STA MCP

2 Statistics and AOV Table
Rank Variety Mean Yield 5 A 50.3 4 B 69.0 6 C 24.0 2 D 94.0 3 E 75.0 1 F 95.3 n1=n2=n3=n4=n5=n=4 ANOVA Table Source df MeanSquare F Variety ** Error STA MCP

3 Overall F-test indicates that we reject H0 and assume HA
Which mean is not equal to which other means. Consider all possible comparisons between varieties: First sort the treatment levels such that the level with the smallest sample mean is first down to the level with the largest sample mean. Then in a table (matrix) format, compute the differences for all of the t(t-1)/2 possible pairs of level means. STA MCP

4 Differences for all of the t(t-1)/2=15 possible pairs of level means
Largest Difference Smallest difference Question: How big does the difference have to be before we consider it “significantly big”? STA MCP

5 Fisher’s Protected LSD
F=24.8 > F5,18,.05= > F is significant Implies that the two treatment level means are statistically different at the a = 0.05 level. c a b c d d Alternate ways to indicate grouping of means. STA MCP

6 Tukey’s W (Honestly Significant Difference)
Not protected hence no preliminary F test required. Table 10 Ott&Longnecker Implies that the two treatment level means are statistically different at the a = 0.05 level. a b bc c d d d STA MCP

7 Student-Newman-Keul Procedure (SNK)
Not protected hence no preliminary F test required. Table 10 row Error df=18 a = 0.05 col = r neighbors One between Two between STA MCP

8 SNK ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ a b c c d d
Implies that the two treatment level means are statistically different at the a = 0.05 level. a b c c d d STA MCP

9 Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test
Not protected hence no preliminary F test required. Table on Next page row Error df=18 a = 0.05 col = r neighbors One between Two between STA MCP

10 Duncan’s Test Critical values
STA MCP

11 STA MCP

12 Duncan’s MRT ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ a b c c d d
Implies that the two treatment level means are statistically different at the a = 0.05 level. a b c c d d STA MCP

13 Waller-Duncan K-Ratio MCP (Protected)
F=24.8 > F5,18,.05=2.77 => F is significant Fisher LSD=16.27) Table next page, F=25, row=2-4 col=18 Implies that the two treatment level means are statistically different at the a = 0.05 level. a b c c d d STA MCP

14 Waller-Duncan MRT Critical Values
STA MCP

15 STA MCP

16 STA MCP

17 Waller Duncan Table K=500 STA MCP

18 STA MCP

19 Scheffé’s S Method F=24.8 > F5,18,.05=2.77 => F is significant
For comparing Reject Ho: l=0 at a=0.05 if Since each treatment is replicated the same number of time, S will be the same for comparing any pair of treatment means. STA MCP

20 Any difference larger than S=28.82 is significant.
Scheffe’s S Method Any difference larger than S=28.82 is significant. Implies that the two treatment level means are statistically different at the a = 0.05 level. a a b b c b c c c Very conservative => Experimentwise error driven. STA MCP

21 Grouping of Ranked Means
LSD SNK Duncan’s Waller-Duncan Tukey’s HSD Scheffe’s S Which grouping will your use? 1) What is your risk level? 2) Comparisonwise versus Experimentwise error concerns. STA MCP

22 Which method to use? Some practical advice
If comparisons were decided upon before examining the data (best): Just one comparison – use the standard (two-sample) t-test. Few comparisons – use Bonferroni adjustment to the t-test. With m comparisons, use /m for the critical value. Many comparisons – Bonferroni becomes increasingly conservative as m increases. At some point it is better to use Tukey or Scheffe. If comparisons were decided upon after examining the data: Just want pairwise comparisons – use Tukey. All contrasts (linear combinations of treatment means) – use Scheffe. STA MCP


Download ppt "Multiple Comparisons: Example"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google