Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Metabolic engineering of microbial competitive advantage for industrial fermentation processes by A. Joe Shaw, Felix H. Lam, Maureen Hamilton, Andrew Consiglio,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Metabolic engineering of microbial competitive advantage for industrial fermentation processes by A. Joe Shaw, Felix H. Lam, Maureen Hamilton, Andrew Consiglio,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Metabolic engineering of microbial competitive advantage for industrial fermentation processes
by A. Joe Shaw, Felix H. Lam, Maureen Hamilton, Andrew Consiglio, Kyle MacEwen, Elena E. Brevnova, Emily Greenhagen, W. Greg LaTouf, Colin R. South, Hans van Dijken, and Gregory Stephanopoulos Science Volume 353(6299): August 5, 2016 Published by AAAS

2 Fig. 1 The ROBUST strategy.
The ROBUST strategy. Macronutrients essential for microbial growth are supplied in the form of xenobiotic or ecologically rare chemicals. Metabolic pathways enabling macronutrient assimilation are engineered in the desired biocatalyst (blue cells), establishing them as the dominant microorganism over nonutilizing contaminants (brown and red cells) inside the industrial bioreactor environment. NAD+, oxidized nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADH; reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. A. Joe Shaw et al. Science 2016;353: Published by AAAS

3 Fig. 2 Competition experiments in glucose medium.
Competition experiments in glucose medium. Each panel shows colony-forming unit (CFU) counts during cofermentation of ROBUST and control strains inoculated at a 1:1 ratio in defined glucose medium, with either standard or ROBUST chemicals supplying key macronutrients. (A) E. coli strains NS102 (containing the reference plasmid pACYC177) and NS163 (containing the melamine utilization plasmid pNC153), co-inoculated with ammonium chloride or melamine as the nitrogen source. (B) S. cerevisiae reference strain NS891 and cyanamide hydratase–expressing strain NS586, co-inoculated with urea or cyanamide as the nitrogen source. (C) Y. lipolytica reference strain NS535 and phosphite dehydrogenase–expressing strain NS324, co-inoculated with potassium phosphate or potassium phosphite as the phosphorus source. CFU counts are reported as means ± SD (n = 4). A. Joe Shaw et al. Science 2016;353: Published by AAAS

4 Fig. 3 Improved biocatalyst fitness with industrial feedstocks.
Improved biocatalyst fitness with industrial feedstocks. Shown are data from aerobic fermentation with ROBUST S. cerevisiae NS586 and contaminant K. marxianus CBS (A) Sugarcane juice with potassium phosphate or potassium phosphite as the phosphorus source. (B) Wheat straw lignocellulosic hydrolysate with urea or cyanamide as the nitrogen source. CFU counts are reported as means ± SD (n = 3). A. Joe Shaw et al. Science 2016;353: Published by AAAS

5 Fig. 4 ROBUST-enabled grain-to-lipid fermentation.
ROBUST-enabled grain-to-lipid fermentation. (A) Dry-mill corn fractionation enables low-cost separation of food- and animal feed–quality germ and fiber from fractionated corn mash. (B) Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation in fractionated mash co-inoculated with lipid-overproducing Y. lipolytica NS392 (engineered for phosphite utilization) and contaminating S. cerevisiae strain Ethanol Red at a 10:1 initial ratio, with potassium phosphate supplying phosphorus. (C) Fermentation under identical conditions, except with potassium phosphite supplying phosphorus. In (B) and (C), CFU counts are reported as means ± SD (n = 4). (D) Lipid accumulation, reported as fatty acid methyl ester (FAME), at the end of fermentation. A. Joe Shaw et al. Science 2016;353: Published by AAAS


Download ppt "Metabolic engineering of microbial competitive advantage for industrial fermentation processes by A. Joe Shaw, Felix H. Lam, Maureen Hamilton, Andrew Consiglio,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google