1. TGs Process Date: 2005-01-18 Authors: January 2005 January 2005
doc.: IEEE /26r0
January 2005
TGs Process
Date:
Authors:
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures < ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola

2. January 2005
doc.: IEEE /26r0
January 2005
Abstract
Slides for discussion of the IEEE TGs process in getting to a Draft.
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola

3. Mesh Networking Task Group Process
January 2005
doc.: IEEE /26r0
January 2005
Mesh Networking Task Group Process
ESS MESH
FREE
IEEE TGs
the
APs
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola

4. Generic Process of Getting to Letter Ballot
January 2005
doc.: IEEE /26r0
January 2005
Generic Process of Getting to Letter Ballot
Adoption of PAR and 5 Criteria
Technical Presentations and Discussions
Specify Any Additional Requirements, Comparison Criteria, or Other Documents
Call For Proposals
Select/Combine from Submitted Complete/Partial Proposals to Produce a Draft
Refine Draft
Letter Ballot
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola

5. January 2005
Task Group Timelines
Time from PAR approval to first Letter Ballot – average of 6.6 meetings / 13 months
TGe-7, TGf-7, TGg-9, TGh-4, TGi-6
Time from first Letter Ballot to first Sponsor Ballot – average of 9 meetings / 18 months
TGe-12, TGf-9, TGg-6, TGh-8, TGi-10
(above data compiled by Bruce Kraemer)
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola

6. Our Timeline Our PAR approval was 24 June 2004
January 2005
Our Timeline
Our PAR approval was 24 June 2004
At the average pace for the above Task Groups, our first Letter Ballot would open in July 2005 and our first Sponsor Ballot in January 2007.
We are now behind the average pace for our first Letter Ballot.
We publicly announced January 2005 for a call for proposals to be submitted in July It will be some number of meeting beyond that before we can even try for our first WG Letter Ballot.
Things will generally happen slower than what we aim for.
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola

7. Schedule Projected at San Antonio (November) Meeting
January 2005
doc.: IEEE /26r0
January 2005
Schedule Projected at San Antonio (November) Meeting
January 2005 (Monterey, California)
Work on Call for Proposals and on the Functional Requirements, Comparison Criteria, and other documents that may be referenced in the Call for Proposals.
Call for Proposals issued immediately after meeting with deadline for submission of two weeks before the July meeting.
March 2005 (Atlanta, Georgia)
Presentations, refinement of selection criteria and process
May 2005 (Beijing, China)
July 2005 (San Francisco, California)
Presentation of Proposals and initial selection actions
September 2005 (TBD) Derivation of Draft
November 2005 (Vancouver, British Columbia) Further Refinement of Draft
January 2006 () Letter Ballot Authorized by WG?
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola

8. Possible TGs Activity Before Next Meeting
January 2005
doc.: IEEE /26r0
January 2005
Possible TGs Activity Before Next Meeting
Possibilities for TGs Activity Between January 2005 and March 2005 Meetings to accelerate action :
One or more official face to face meetings, requires 30 days notice (P&P clause 3.6.2)
Multiple Teleconferences (require 10 days notice, cannot be held more often than weekly (P&P clause 3.6.3))
One Teleconference
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola

9. Schedule Projected at Monterey (January) Meeting
doc.: IEEE /26r0
January 2005
Schedule Projected at Monterey (January) Meeting
March 2005 (Atlanta, Georgia)
Brief proposal presentations, refinement of proposal process
May 2005 (TBD)
July 2005 (San Francisco, California)
Presentation of proposals and initial selection actions
September 2005 (Orange County, California)
Down selection
November 2005 (Vancouver, British Columbia)
Derivation of Draft
January 2006 (TBD)
Further Refinement of Draft
March 2006 (New Orleans, Louisiana)
Letter Ballot Authorized by WG?
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola