1. Linearization Generation
Editing
Commenting
Translation Tool
Browsing
Print Generation
Public Commenting
Peer Review
Linearization Generation
Public Proposals
Public Scoring
Mini questionnaires

4. Easy to use
Fast
Searchable
Bookmarkable – back button

7. Public Commenting Open to public
Comments attachable to concepts or property values
Allows threads
Keeps track of changes of the content that it is attached to.
Supports moderation of comments

10. Public Scoring
Allows the public to give scores on individual property values. (i.e. descriptions, synonyms, etc.)
Similar to stars or up vote / down vote mechanisms used in various sites.

11. Public Mini Questionnaires
Is this category in the right place?
Yes No
Is the definition clearly formulated
1 Very Clear 2 3 4
5 Not clear at all

12. Proposal Mechanism
Allows public to propose changes in the classification
Content of individual concepts.
Classification hierarchy (structural changes)
Proposal can be attached to concepts at any level in the classification.
There may be multiple proposals attached to one ICD concept.
Users of the tool generate proposals
Feedback / filter by web of trust
TAG ME applies changes

13. Proposals for Structural Changes
This type of proposals involves changes in the classification hierarchy mainly by splitting or moving concepts.
These proposals will include a text explaining the changes together with some additional structured content about the proposal.
These proposals can be attached to multiple ICD concepts.

14. Content Proposals
The actual proposal will be done by editing a clone of the ICD11 concept
A proposal might suggest changes to one or more of the content model parameters
It may be as simple as suggesting a synonym
Or it might have a several of the content model parameters filled in including the ones bound to a value set.

15. Peer Reviewing - 1 The tool will keep a pool of Reviewers
Request review
Tag managing editor
Reviewer
Send review
The tool will keep a pool of Reviewers
The TAG Managing Editor will be in charge of sending the content to reviewers when it’s ready.
The tool will provide a mechanism to select the unit to be reviewed together with reviewer(s) from the pool to start the process.
The tool will automatically notify the reviewer with a hyperlink to a web form that he/she will use for the review

16. Peer Reviewing – 2
Review of the foundation and linearization hierarchy
The unit of review in this case will be a sub-tree of a linearization.
Reviewers of this type for the linearizations will be mainly horizontal TAGs (MTAG, MbTAG and their work groups)
The review will be done by filling a template form.
Review of concept content
The unit of review in this case will be one concept
Reviewers will be domain experts.
The review will be done by filling a template form

17. Translation Tool Allows translation of ICD-11 content
Uses a translation memory filled with pre-existing translations of ICD-10
To support the translation workflow

18. Linearization Generation
Editing
Commenting
Translation Tool
Browsing
Print Generation
Public Commenting
Peer Review
Linearization Generation
How will it come together
More importantly how will it communicate with iCat
Public Proposals
Public Scoring
Mini questionnaires

19. Linearization Generation
Stanford
WHO
Public Platform ?
Browsing
Public Commenting
iCat
Linearization Generation
Scoring
Mini Questionnaire
Persisted objects
Print Generation
Peer Review
iCat db dump
Loader
Public Proposals

20. MOCKUP - PROPOSAL PROCESSING

21. Proposal Processing at the iCat
After the some of the proposal items are accepted the platform would expose the following information in a web service
Action ID
Accepted By
Concept ID
Property
Action
Value
Some guid
R. Jakob
synonym
Add
Infection due to Salmonella typhi
Delete
Paratyphoid fever A
Body Site
iCat periodically checks this service and applies the changes.