Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
PCS Technical Board 17th October 2017, Vienna
2
Agenda
3
Agenda Release plan till the end of 2019 including Major Release 2017 (~1 h) New change request workflow (~10 m) C-OSS guideline implementation (~1,5 h) Empty Envelope Concept status update (~0,5 h) PCS IT Day (~0,5 h) TAF-TSI Pilot results update (~10 m) Communication plan (~0,5 h) 27 November 2018
4
Release Plan, timeline
5
PCS Core Group 6th November (mockups, wireframes)
Until 1th November 2017 Exception to N day rule PA/PM operations New notification messages Enable loco types for C-OSS Unify branches (Major Release, IP cons., Monitoring app) Until January 2018 PCS Core Group 6th November (mockups, wireframes) Interviews – 13th November Deletion of saved drafts CNDW Filters, labels Trivial CRs (1130, 1220, 1141, 1229) EEC requirements locked – end of the year 2017 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Test 16th March Prod 4th April Test Prod EEC workshop 5th February 2018 Editing of C-OSS TT Alternative offer in Pre-booking phase PAMT report for RU/IM Withdraw dossier – process issue Open EEC branch EEC techn.specs. (including IP) – latest 27th February Minor 2018 EEC Single Border Point administration New PaP product Major 2018 Non-RU applicant Single Border Point usage in dossiers Validity period of master data (locos, parameters, agencies) Major 2019 27 November 2018
6
Details of „Until 1th November”
Exception of N day rule Possibility for C-OSS to import PaPs inside the „N day rule” window Support Short Term Path Request pilots with PaPs PA/PM operations New notification messages Only in Late and Ad-Hoc path request process RFC, IM, AB receives when new path request arrived RU receives when Harmonization started, offer (draft, ad-hoc, final) arrived Enable loco types for C-OSS Provide the same read-only view to C-OSS as for the RUs 27 November 2018
7
Details of „Until January 2018”
Deletion of saved drafts in CNDW Filters, labels Trivial change requests Rename of field „days in service on this path“ (1130) Improved editing of the TT when add a location (1220) No partial harmonization with non-PCS agency (1141) Advanced Search criteria reset, hidden fields (1229) 27 November 2018
8
Details of „Minor 2018” C-OSS TT rest of the work: Editing of C-OSS TT
Alternative offer in Pre-booking phase PAMT report for RUs/IMs „Withdraw & close” dossier – process issue Leading RU regardless of the colour of the ligths From Observations, Post-Processing, Final Offer to Closed phase Automatic promotion until X-3: dossier from Final Offer to Closed, if all lights are red Irreversible action!!! 27 November 2018
9
Details of „Major 2018” Empty Envelope Concept – details on following slides Single Border Point Approach administration Similar approach as with the Loco Types Development of the administration area Preparation of the data in PCS Test and after Major 2018 in PCS Production by the IMs Possible warning mechanism already in EEC New PaP product – details on following slides 27 November 2018
10
PCS Core Group 6th November (mockups, wireframes)
Until 1th November 2017 Exception to N day rule PA/PM operations New notification messages Enable loco types for C-OSS Unify branches (Major Release, IP cons., Monitoring app) Until January 2018 PCS Core Group 6th November (mockups, wireframes) Interviews – 13th November Deletion of saved drafts CNDW Filters, labels Trivial CRs (1130, 1220, 1141, 1229) EEC requirements locked – end of the year 2017 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Test 16th March Prod 4th April Test Prod EEC workshop 5th February 2018 Editing of C-OSS TT Alternative offer in Pre-booking phase PAMT report for RU/IM Withdraw dossier – process issue Open EEC branch EEC techn.specs. (including IP) – latest 27th February Minor 2018 EEC Single Border Point administration New PaP product Major 2018 Non-RU applicant Single Border Point usage in dossiers Validity period of master data (locos, parameters, agencies) Major 2019 27 November 2018
11
New change request workflow
12
New elements in the workflow
Maintenance issue Waiting for requirement Requirement analysis Waiting for specification Under specification Specified Process issue, waiting for agreement Proposed to reject Change Request Development state Complexity Small, Medium, Big, Huge Responsibility PCS Team, S & TT, NCA, Users, … 27 November 2018
13
C-OSS guideline implementation
14
Timeline Pre-booking phase RFC traffic light separation from IM light
TT2019 Pre-booking phase RFC traffic light separation from IM light C-OSS timetable (read-only) C-OSS timetable (editable) PaP publication of reference PaP with slots Threshold/warning instead of error in parameter set codes Adjusting conflict resolution Provide full update possibility for IMs in Path Elaboration Publication of updated import sheet New classification of operation point protection Implementation of the bandwidth Major Release 2017 ✓ Minor Release 2018 ⌛ Major Release 2018 Minor Release 2019 June 2019 latest Major Release 2019 TT2020 TT2021 27 November 2018
15
For TT2019 Pre-booking phase:
When RU submits path request with a PaP in the dossier Dossier status id: PB IM has read-only rights C-OSS has editing rights Separated traffic lights: easier search C-OSS TT: C-OSS has editing rights on the PaPs and the additional intermediate sections Times Parameters Calendar cannot be changed, the capacity is reserved Special cases when C-OSS timetable update would result offset on the IM’s part Copy to IM TT while C-OSS promotes the dossier from Pre-booking to Path Elaboration 27 November 2018
16
For TT2020 First step of the implementation of the new PaP product
Slot approach development No changes in the import Adjustment of PaP Manager for C-OSS to mark the number of slots Changes in the conflict resolution Bandwidth definition only on organizational level Soft cap for the parameter set code limits Option 1: RU/RFC can exceed the defined values and gets warning instead of the current error Option 2: threshold definition for each parameters in the set code, exceeding is not allowed. E.g. 50 meters threshold in the train length, 100 tons threshold in the weight of set of carriages, etc. Development to give freedom to IMs in Path Elaboration (time, parameter, calendar update) 27 November 2018
17
For 2021 Second step of the implementation of the new PaP product
New classification of operation point protection Currently: protected/flexible Bandwidth definition: RFC/IM can define bandwidth for each operation point (± timeframe) RU/RFC has to consider the defined bandwidth In the starting phase (e.g. first timetable period) it would be still soft cap for the IMs PaP import sheet needs to be updated New protection option Bandwidth definition 27 November 2018
18
Questions How do you plan to mark the published PaPs in your national system? How do you plan to safeguard the published bandwidth surrounding the reference PaP? Please note that the update of the capacity would be supported and not the erase/create from zero approach! Are you able to handle this in the national system before TTR implementation? 27 November 2018
19
Empty Envelope Concept Status
20
Scope of the project What is in the scope of the project? What would we like to do? Creation of standard dossier structure Border harmonization Calendar consistency What is out of scope of the project? Change of the process in PCS Why do we need this? Establish the possibility of quality control and monitoring of timetables Create readable dossiers Check timetable quality task force measures 27 November 2018
21
Core Team Workshop September 20-21
Ground rules were: Less discussion, more „together individually” work Roles: Facilitators: Jana Karcheska (NCA), Jorge Campo (RNE) Decider: Matthias Lück (DB-F), Máté Bak (RNE) Steps of the sprint method: Map Sketch Decision Prototype Test Interview during prototype testing with Peter Bouman (NSI) and Julia Weiss (DB Cargo) Questionnaire about EEC and current PCS usage among the participants 27 November 2018
22
Core Team Workshop September 20-21
Result of the hitmap showed the focus points Timetable presentation Notification in case of modification: questions were raised in two dimensions: Calendar changes Geography changes (borders) Propagation of changes among the timetables Participants were invited to prepare sketches for the above mentioned points Sketches: Voting on sketches and explanations Result: None of them was 100% perfect, but each of them had at least 1 useful detail We should combine the ideas and adopt them to the prototype and to the wireframes Best workshop ever in EEC history 27 November 2018
23
RU and IM positions Opposite sides in the meeting room IMs:
Handover – Handover subpath Border harmonization Calendar consistency RUs: View of the full timetable in each combination (train) Possibility to edit these combination Possibility to give name and order to the combinations Win – win: Timetable combination views have generated names based on the RU entries in the subpath title Quick link from combination view to the particular subpath for editing (showing neighbouring timetables) PCS stores the information in subpath according the IM’s demands 27 November 2018
24
Next steps Process and prepare the feedback from the last workshop
Adopt the prototype, create new wireframes Deadline: 6th November, Core Group video conference Quick Core Group feedback about the changes Deadline: 10th November Reason for short time: feedback can arrive even a bit later, but if changes should be done before PCS day presentation, we need the information as soon as possible Interviews: 13th November: interview again (!) with Core Group members. Result of the former prototype test could be compared to the updated Rest of 46th week: interview with the members of the extended group Next personal meeting: 5th February 27 November 2018
25
PCS IT Day
26
PCS IT Day PCS IT Day won’t be a PCS Technical Board meeting
The purpose is to share knowledge From us to you From you to us Among you Topics from the PCS Team (RNE & NCA) to you: General information about handling: Loco types, TAF/TSI fields, PaP identifiers, complementary calendar Path Alteration/Path Modification How to go through the process? How to use new the operations? IP Consolidation package: Automated test 27 November 2018
27
PCS IT Day What kind of agenda would you like?
Topics from us are known Questions received from the registered participants Topics from you… Infrabel would like to present… SNCF Reseau would love to talk about… SZDC insists to share that… ÖBB has an idea about… Don’t think about big global presentation! Pick only one small segment, e.g. operation point update, using change sets from notification service, etc. 27 November 2018
28
TAF-TSI Pilot results
29
Just as a reminder: Transition and Integration layer between PCS and CI
27 November 2018
30
TAF-TSI Pilot Test Manager https://til.rne.eu/taf-testmanager/
(attached) (attached) Inbound communication: RU/IM sends message to RNE CI Triggers usual PCS web-service operations (updatePath, updateProgressStatus, etc.) Outbound communication: PCS agency notification is connected to the TIL. Testing partner RUs now: SZ-C RCA TIL triggers usual TSI messages (PathCoordination, PathDetails, etc.) and sends to the partner CI 27 November 2018
31
Communication plan
32
Changes Based on the feedback from PCS Change Control Board and other forums… Login screen: Supported PCS IP version will be shown on PCS login screen PCS IP Documentation link will be updated on the login screen and linked to PCS IP Handbook in CMS (Migration guide in the related documentation) Migration guide: It’s written there, if the particular version is Not longer supported Supported Will be supported from… Publication date and update date is indicated for the particular versions 27 November 2018
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.