1. Selection of the Triggered Action Response Plan as a Leading Practice to combat Uncontrolled Falls of Ground Andre van Zyl CoM MOSH Learning Hub

3. Selection of TARP as a Leading Practice
MOSH Process Requirement
Industry Driven
Glenburn Workshop 16 March 2011
Over 40 Participants
Rock Related Safety Causal Chain Verified
Major Policies and Trends Impacts Discussed

4. Summary of Leading Practices
Visualisation of Rock Related Hazards (Virtual Reality Programme)
TARP System as at Kroondal Chrome
FOGM System (AngloGold Ashanti and AngloPlatinum)
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

5. Selection Criteria OHS Impacts Costs Time to Implement
Readiness for Adoption
Accessibility
Operational Constraints

6. Leading Practice(s) Selected
TARP + Virtual Reality (E-Learning)

7. Work Place Application (Line Management, Supervisor and Team Process)
Triggered Action Response Plan
Work Place Application
(Line Management, Supervisor and Team Process)

8. Why Joel Mine Different environment to Source Mine
Operationally Successful
Joel Risk Profile set to Change
Willingness of Harmony to Adopt and Assist

9. Value Case Impact Evaluation Health and Safety Improvements Positive
Cost of Implementation
Negative
Production Impacts
Initial Impact on Production
Long-term Impact on Production
Indirect Impact on Operations
Legal Implications
Overall Assessment on Adoption of TARP