1. Public Policy Evaluation Office National Department of Planning
Executive Evaluation E2
Public Policy Evaluation Office
National Department of Planning

2. Comparison with other well known methodologies
Impact
Primary data
Source: final beneficiary
Counterfactual scenario
Allow to attribute impacts on final beneficiaries
Robustness
Highly demanding of time and $$ E2
Secondary data
Sources: documents and key actors
Give order and establishes relations between design, operative structure, inputs, outputs, and outcomes
It concentrates in operative issues
Don't establish cause effects relations
Results
Primary and secondary data
Sources: Mixed
Establishes outputs, outcomes in the short, mid and long time
Rebuild the value chain
Analyze goals and sustainability of achievements
Don’t analyze operations neither allow to attribute cause effects relations
Information
Process
Strengths
Weaknesses

3. Pacific Plan Program Example E2 Results evaluation
To analyze information use and produced
To analyze focalizations tools
To evaluate core and support processes
To evaluate project selection criteria
To identified and evaluate supervision mechanism and project monitoring
To determine national policy coordination mechanism
To produce adjust plans E2
Results evaluation
Pacific Plan Program
To determine socioeconomic changes in population
To evaluate institutional capacity changes
To evaluate beneficiaries perception of actions or results
To evaluate goals accomplishment and logic frame
Ti verified facilities and its sustainability

4. e2 e2 Analytical framework SINERGIA
Evaluación de Programas Gubernamentales - EPG CHILE
Budgetary constraints and complexities
Information problems e2
design with wide participation of experts.
Pilots in different sectors and government levels.
Adjust and reinvention.
SINERGIA
Diagnosis process e2
Absent of evaluations and problems with those existents
Program Assestment Rating Tool Review – PART USA

5. E2 Questions Target Users
Need to know in a short time why a program is not working properly ?
Need to have a reference to evaluate the program in the future?
Programs Managers
Planning Offices
Need to order Program information and processes? E2
Produce standard and comparable information among programs
Allows to evaluate a major number of programs that need analysis
Intersectorial Evaluation Comite
Support redesign processes and realignment of strategies, and budgetary decisions

6. Methodological approach
Theoretical Model
Logic Frame
Program Cycle
Processes

7. Information si no Qualification Criteria 1 a 4 or yes / no
Description based on documental information.
DESK REVIEW
Rebuild missing information using other sources.
Field work no
¿Is internal information enoughtto describe the program? si
Description complete
Program evaluation
Qualification Criteria
1 a 4 or yes / no

8. Evaluation topics Strategic design Operations management Inputs
Institutional framework
Strategic management, monitoring and evaluation
Results
Inputs

9. Turns into standard indicators by topics
Evaluation process
Turns into standard indicators by topics

10. Standard indicators

11. Information analysis Information is: Disposable Up to date Timely
Complete
Information quality about design

12. Products
Description (Logic Frame)
Evaluation
Information Check Box
Conclusions, global diagnosis, and adjusts plans.