Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A Randomized Multicenter Trial of Minimally Invasive Rapid Deployment Versus Conventional Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement  Michael A. Borger,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A Randomized Multicenter Trial of Minimally Invasive Rapid Deployment Versus Conventional Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement  Michael A. Borger,"— Presentation transcript:

1 A Randomized Multicenter Trial of Minimally Invasive Rapid Deployment Versus Conventional Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement  Michael A. Borger, MD, PhD, Vadim Moustafine, MD, Lenard Conradi, MD, Christoph Knosalla, MD, PhD, Markus Richter, MD, PhD, Denis R. Merk, MD, Torsten Doenst, MD, PhD, Robert Hammerschmidt, MD, Hendrik Treede, MD, PhD, Pascal Dohmen, MD, PhD, Justus T. Strauch, MD  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015) DOI: /j.athoracsur Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

2 Fig 1 Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram. (FS-AVR = full sternotomy aortic valve replacement; MIS-RDAVR = minimally invasive surgery – aortic valve replacement.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , 17-25DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

3 Fig 2 Edwards Intuity valve showing the subannular skirt frame in (A) precrimped configuration, (B) deployed configuration, and (C) complete valve deployment system. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery  , 17-25DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "A Randomized Multicenter Trial of Minimally Invasive Rapid Deployment Versus Conventional Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement  Michael A. Borger,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google