1. Incorporating genetic potential when evaluating stature in children with cystic fibrosis 
Zhumin Zhang, Suzanne M. Shoff, HuiChuan J. Lai 
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (March 2010)
DOI: /j.jcf
Copyright © 2010 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
An example illustrating unadjusted height, Himes adjusted height, and the CFF target height and lower bound for a 15year-old boy with unadjusted height of 157cm (= 5th percentile) and mid-parental height of 160cm.
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 2010 9, DOI: ( /j.jcf )
Copyright © 2010 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Comparison of unadjusted height percentiles and Himes adjusted height percentiles in children with CF. Short parents: average parental height percentiles ≤25th; average parents: average parental height percentiles between 26th and 74th; tall parents: average parental height percentiles ≥75th.
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 2010 9, DOI: ( /j.jcf )
Copyright © 2010 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Pair-wise comparisons of the discrepancy among four methods of determining the prevalence of short stature in CF children. Short parents: average parental height percentiles ≤25th; average parents: average parental height percentiles between 26th and 74th; tall parents: average parental height percentiles ≥75th.
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 2010 9, DOI: ( /j.jcf )
Copyright © 2010 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 4
Comparison between unadjusted height percentile (panel A) and Himes adjusted height percentile (panel B) on their associations to lung function parameter percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (%FEV1) in CF children with discrepant classification on short stature at age 15 (n=217).
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 2010 9, DOI: ( /j.jcf )
Copyright © 2010 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Terms and Conditions