Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Weekly Meeting October 5 2017.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Weekly Meeting October 5 2017."— Presentation transcript:

1 Weekly Meeting October

2 DMC – MidasIO Not much of an update here
Amy said she asked Belina about completing a midas writer in the midasio files, I’m not sure what (if any) conclusion came from that There is still debate about whether A&M will use CDMSBats or midasio to read in midas files

3 DQM Meeting today with Amy, Joel, Noah
Discuss various deciders based on noise traces: Non-freq dependent, total noise power: 𝑣(𝑡) 2 = 𝑑𝑓 𝐽(𝑓) → 𝑣 𝑡 𝑚𝑜𝑑 = 𝑑𝑓 𝐽 𝑓 ×𝑁 𝑠 (𝑓) 𝑣 𝑡 𝑚𝑜𝑑 = 𝑑𝑓 𝐽 𝑓 × 𝑤 (𝑓) Freq dependent decider: Could this take the place of selected peak checks?

4 DQM Other possible decider: Other questions/comments:
Some type of quantitative comparison between noise PSD and idealized noise PSD – this may be a redundant check Other questions/comments: Can we assume Gaussian noise distributions, the mean = 0? Detector and channel(?) specific thresholds Multi-level thresholds Sampling at beginning of runs – is just one sample take, or multiple samples? Sampling periodically, having some history record? Coincidence – maybe not

5 Photoelectric Absorption

6 Photoelectric Absorption
Can we obtain uncertainties from the Henke data? The Henke data isn’t strictly measured data. It takes experimental data from wherever it can find it. Interpolates between the data using theoretical calculations from Doolean and Liverman. Where experimental does not exist, it interpolates across Z The experimental data for Si goes down to about 40eV, and 20eV for Ge. The Henke paper also assumes atoms scatter light independently – no condensed matter effects. Generally it has been found experimentally that photoabsoprtion within condensed matter is indeed atomic-like above about 50eV except in energy regions near absorption thresholds. The effects of the condensed state are significant only at the lower energies of interest here.

7 Photoelectric Absorption
I can look for uncertainties from individual data series from the Henke paper. I think there are factors that ought to be considered regarding the cross section values: Temperature dependence State of material (solid, crystal, gaseous) Isotope composition


Download ppt "Weekly Meeting October 5 2017."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google