1. Department of Defence 4th QPR for FY2015/16 (summary)
and
1st QPR for FY2016/17
Presentation to the PCD&MV
31 August 2016
RESTRICTED

2. 4th Quarterly Performance Report FY2015/16 (summary) and
Aim
To present the Department of Defence Financial and Non-Financial Performance on the:
4th Quarterly Performance Report FY2015/16 (summary)
and
1st Quarterly Performance Report FY2016/17
to the Portfolio Committee of Defence and Military Veterans (PCD&MV)
RESTRICTED

3. Scope Legislative Requirements
4th Quarterly Performance Report FY2015/16:
Non-Financial Performance Information
Financial Performance Information
1st Quarterly Performance Report FY2016/17
Defence Review Milestone 1 Implementation Progress
RESTRICTED

4. Legislative Requirements
In terms of Section 38(1) (a) (i) and (ii), of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), Act 1 of 1999 as amended, the “Accounting Officer for a department must ensure that the department has and maintains effective, efficient and transparent systems of financial and risk management and internal control; and a system of internal audit under the control and direction of an audit committee”.
The Treasury Regulations, par states that, “the accounting officer of an institution must establish procedures for quarterly reporting to the executive authority to facilitate effective performance monitoring, evaluation and corrective action”.
RESTRICTED

5. Legislative Requirements cont
The Framework for Strategic Plans and Annual Performance Plans, states that the quarterly report “provides the Accounting Officer with an opportunity to indicate measures that will be taken to ensure that implementation of the Annual Performance Plan remains on track” and that quarterly reports must be submitted to the National Treasury and the Auditor-General for auditing purposes.
DPME in the Presidency’s guideline on the “Preparation of Quarterly Performance Reports” dated May 2016 indicates that preliminary information must be submitted within 30 days after the end of each quarter and actual information must be submitted with preliminary data of the next quarter.
RESTRICTED

6. Non-Financial Performance Information
4th QPR FY2015/16
Non-Financial Performance Information

7. Summary of 4th Quarterly Performance Indicators FY2015/16
3rd Quarter FY2015/16
4th Quarter FY2015/16
Def Sec
SANDF
Achieved
(Green) 22
(65%) 18
(55%) 21
(62%) 35
(61,4%)
Partially Achieved
(Amber) 9
(26%) 15
(45) -
Not Achieved
(Red) 3
(9%)
(0%) 13
(38%)
(38,6%)
Total Targets 34 33
57**
4th Quarter SANDF Total Targets includes 24 x Annual Targets
and excludes 12 x Classified Targets.
Validated info as per audited Annual Report FY2015/16
CONFIDENTIAL

8. Summary of Annual Performance Indicators FY2015/16
No of Targets
Achieved 
Not Achieved
Ministerial Direction 8 -
- Mil Ombud 3
- RFC 1
- DFSC
SANDF (Public & Selected) 57 35 22
SANDF Classified 12 7 5
Defence Secretariat 34
Total
116
77 (66%)
39 (34%)
CONFIDENTIAL

9. Main Reasons for Non-Achievement of Targets
Promulgation of policies was dependent on the finalisation of the Defence Review 2015.
Non-appointment of Military Judges.
Non-compliance of the submission of SMS financial disclosures and performance agreements.
Non-implementation of the Cyber Warfare Implementation Plan due to monetary constraints.
CONFIDENTIAL

10. Main Reasons for Non-Achievement of Targets
Number of force employment hours flown and hours at sea per year dependent on taskings received.
Staffing-related constraints due to verification and vetting procedures.
Matters not within the DOD’s control, ie positions filled vs allocated quota for international institutions.
CONFIDENTIAL

11. Financial Performance Information
4th QPR FY2015/16
Financial Performance Information

12. Summary of State of Expenditure: 31 March 2016
DOD Planned Expenditure: %
R'000
Budget Allocation
45,088,161
Less: Expenditure
45,071,534
Total Amount Available
16,627
Percentage Expenditure (Paid)
99.96%

13. Appropriation Statement: Per Programme
Reasons for under expenditure within programmes:
Administration. Under expenditure mainly within the transfer payment to SASSETA (RM3,021) as a result of the payroll amount, on which the calculations were based to determine the amount payable to SASSETA, being less than anticipated.
Force Employment. Under expenditure of RM13,606 will be reflected against Support to the People due to delay in the procurement of mobility packages utilised for border safeguarding operations.  
CONFIDENTIAL

14. Appropriation Statement: Per Economic Classification
CONFIDENTIAL

15. Non-Financial Performance Information
1st QPR FY2016/17
Non-Financial Performance Information

16. Overall Achievement of 1st Quarterly Performance Targets FY2016/17
Ministerial Direction
Def Sec
SANDF
Achieved
(Green) 7
(100%) 31
(88%) 17
(74%)
Partially Achieved
(Amber) - 2
(6%)
Not Achieved
(Red) 6
(26%)
Total Targets 35 23
CONFIDENTIAL

17. Quarterly Performance Targets Programme 1: Administration
RESTRICTED

18. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Ministry of Defence
Percentage compliance with submission dates of DOD accountability documents
(DOD, ARMSCOR, Castle Control Board & Military Ombud APP tabled in Parliament) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
(1 DOD APP tabled in line with National Prescripts)
(1 ARMSCOR Corporate Plan tabled in line with National Prescripts)
(1 Castle Control Board APP tabled in line with National Prescripts)
(1 Military Ombud APP tabled in line with National Prescripts)
(4 tabled in line with National Prescripts)
Actual - 
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

19. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Ministry of Defence
Percentage compliance with submission dates of DOD accountability documents
(DOD, ARMSCOR, Castle Control Board & Military Ombud Annual Report tabled in Parliament) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
100%
(1 Military Ombud Annual Report tabled in line with National Prescripts)
(1 DOD Annual Report tabled in line with National Prescripts)
(1 ARMSCOR Annual Report tabled in line with National Prescripts)
(1 Castle Control Board Annual Report tabled in line with National Prescripts) -
Actual
1 Military Ombud Annual Report was tabled in line with National Prescripts  -
Overall Progress
1 Military Ombud Annual Report was tabled in line with National Prescripts 
RESTRICTED

20. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
The Military Ombud
Percentage compliance with submission dates of DOD accountability documents (Military Ombud APP submitted to the Executive Authority) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
(1 APP submitted to the Executive Authority)
Actual
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

21. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
The Military Ombud
Percentage compliance with submission dates of DOD accountability documents
(Military Ombud Annual Report submitted to the Executive Authority) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
100%
(1 Annual Report submitted to the Executive Authority) -
Actual
(1 Annual Report submitted to the Executive Authority) 
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

22. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
The Military Ombud
Percentage of written complaints finalised Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
60%
Actual
111% (59) -
Overall Progress
111% 
RESTRICTED

23. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Reserve Force Council
Percentage compliance with submission dates of DOD accountability documents (2 Reports on RFC Activities submitted to the Executive Authority) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
(1 Report on RFC Activities submitted to the Executive Authority)
(2 Reports on RFC Activities submitted to the Executive Authority)
Actual - 
Overall Progress -
RESTRICTED

24. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Defence Force Service Commission
Percentage compliance with submission dates of DOD accountability documents (Annual Report regarding DFSC Activities submitted to the Executive Authority) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
100%
(1 Annual Report on DFSC Activities submitted in line with National Prescripts) -
Actual
(1 Annual Report submitted in line with National Prescripts) 
Overall Progress
Comment:
An electronic copy of the Annual Report on DFSC Activities for FY2015/16 was submitted to the office of the Executive Authority on 31 May 2016 and hard copies were submitted on 03 June 2016.
65 Hard copies were submitted in Parliament on 14 June 2016 for tabling.
An electronic copy of the Annual Report was submitted to be tabled in Parliament on 15 June 2016.
RESTRICTED

25. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Departmental Direction (Office of the Secretary for Defence)
Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule
(SA Defence Review 2015 Implementation status) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
(Monitor implementation of the approved SA Defence Review Implementation Plan)
Actual
Submission of the Defence Review (Milestone 1) Implementation Plan for the MOD&MV approval is planned to take place during the 2nd quarter of FY2016/17. 
Overall Progress
Comment:
The SA Defence Review 2015 adoption by the National Assembly took place on 04 June 2015 and by the National Council of Provinces on 24 June 2015.
RESTRICTED

26. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Departmental Direction (Office of the Secretary for Defence)
Percentage compliance with submission dates of DOD accountability documents
(DOD APP submitted to the Executive Authority) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100% (1 DOD APP submitted to the Executive Authority)
100%
(1 DOD APP submitted to the Executive Authority)
Actual - 
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

27. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Departmental Direction (Office of the Secretary for Defence)
Percentage compliance with submission dates of DOD accountability documents
(DOD Annual Report submitted to the Executive Authority) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
(1 DOD Annual Report submitted to the Executive Authority)  -
Actual
DOD Annual Report (performance Information) submitted to AGSA on 31 May 2016 for auditing purposes and to the MOD&MV for oversight purposes. 
Overall Progress
DOD Annual Report (performance Information) submitted to AGSA on 31 May 2016 for auditing purposes and to the MOD&MV for oversight purposes.
RESTRICTED

28. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Departmental Direction (Office of the Secretary for Defence)
Established DOD strategic research capability status Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
Policy Research Unit Concept document approved
Actual
The DOD Strategic Research Capability will be incorporated into the structure and function of the Chief Defence Scientist. A position paper was compiled and submitted to the Defence Review Implementation Planning Team for inclusion in the Defence Review 2015 (Milestone 1) Implementation Plan. 
Overall Progress
The DOD Strategic Research Capability will be incorporated into the structure and function of the Chief Defence Scientist. A position paper was compiled and submitted to the Defence Review Implementation Planning Team for inclusion in the Defence Review 2015 (Milestone 1) Implementation Plan.  
RESTRICTED

29. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Departmental Direction (Government Information Technology Officer)
Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule
(Information and Communication Systems Policy Development Plan status) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -  -
100%
(Monitor and Review)
Actual - 
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

30. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Departmental Direction (Government Information Technology Officer)
Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule
(Department of Defence Strategy status) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
(Monitor and Review)
Actual - 
Overall Progress
 - 
RESTRICTED

31. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Policy and Planning
Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule (Policy) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
25%
100%
Actual
25%  -
Overall Progress
Comment:
Policy advice and quality assurance on 25 DODIs provided. Three policies processed for approval and promulgation.
RESTRICTED

32. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Policy and Planning
Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule (Strategy) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
25%
100%
Actual -
Overall Progress
25% 
Comment:
2 Strategic Interventions:
DOD Strat Plan Work Session May 2016.
DOD Planning, Budgeting, Reporting, Risk Management and Performance Information Training Programme May 2016.
RESTRICTED

33. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Policy and Planning
Percentage compliance with submission dates of DOD accountability documents Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
50%
(1 DOD Annual Report submitted in line with National Prescripts)
(1 DOD APP submitted in line with National Pre-scripts)
100%
(1 DOD Annual Report and 1 DOD APP submitted in line with National Prescripts)
Actual
DOD Annual Report (performance Information) submitted to AGSA on 31 May 2016 for auditing purposes and to the MOD&MV for oversight purposes.
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

34. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Policy and Planning
DOD Enterprise Risk Management maturity level achieved Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
Level 4
Actual - 
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

35. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Policy and Planning
DOD Management Performance Assessment Tool, assessment level achieved Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
Level 2.6
Actual - 
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

36. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Military Policy Strategy and Planning Office
Percentage compliance with submission dates of DOD accountability documents (SANDF quarterly reports submitted to the Executive Authority) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
 25%
(1)
25%
(1) 
100%
(4 SANDF quarterly reports submitted to the Executive Authority)
Actual -
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

37. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Military Policy Strategy and Planning Office
Percentage compliance with the progress of the establishment of the Military Strategic Direction Register Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target  -
 48%
(17)
Actual
14%
(5) -
Overall Progress
(5) 
RESTRICTED

38. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Financial Services
Percentage compliance with submission dates of DOD accountability documents
(Percentage compliance with DOD financial management products) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
24%
(9)
27%
(10)
100%
(37 Financial management products submitted in line with National Prescripts)
Actual
(9)  -
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

39. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Financial Services
Number of Audit Qualifications Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
Actual - 
Overall Progress
Comment:
Relates to FY2016/17 Audit Cycle.
RESTRICTED

40. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Financial Services
Percentage payments within 30 days from receipt of payable legitimate invoices Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
75%
Actual
76%  -
Overall Progress
Comment:
Legitimate invoices out of a possible legitimate invoices received, were paid within a period of 30 days.
RESTRICTED

41. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Financial Services
Percentage deviation from approved drawing schedule Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
<8%
Actual
4%  -
Overall Progress 4%
Comment:
Deviation must be less than 8%. The deviation was within target range.
RESTRICTED

42. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule
(Internship Policy Status) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -  -
100%
(Policy Development)
Actual
Draft Policy finalised and submitted for inputs by DOD Legal Services. - 
Overall Progress
Draft Policy finalised and submitted for inputs by DOD Legal Services. 
RESTRICTED

43. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule
(Human Resources Strategy Status) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
Implemented Strategy)
Actual
The Annual Implementation Plan of the HR Development Strategy was distributed to all Services and Divisions for implementation by end of FY2016/17. 
Overall Progress
Comments:
The Performance Indicator “Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule (Human Resource Strategy status)” was incorrectly stated in the DOD APP for 2016, and should be “Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule (Human Resource Development Strategy status)”.
RESTRICTED

44. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule
(DOD Ethics Management status) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
(DOD Ethics Policy Approved)
Actual
Draft DOD Ethics Policy submitted to DOD Legal Services for inputs. 
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

45. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Percentage compliance with submission dates of DOD accountability documents
(SMS financial disclosures submitted) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
75% submitted
100% submitted -
100%
Actual
(280)
Overall Progress
(280) 
RESTRICTED

46. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Percentage compliance with submission dates of DOD accountability documents
(SMS Performance Agreements Submitted) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
75% submitted
100% submitted  - -
100%
Actual
43% 
Overall Progress
43%
Comment:
119 out of 280 performance agreements received.
RESTRICTED

47. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Percentage of disciplinary cases in the DOD finalised within 90 days (PSAP Disciplinary Cases) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
100%  -
Actual
4%  -
Overall Progress
Comment:
1 out of 24 cases received was finalised within 90 days.
23 Cases finalised occurred outside the 90 days requirement.
The complexity of some cases required more time for finalisation.
RESTRICTED

48. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Percentage collective grievances and disputes resolved Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
20%
25%
85%
Actual
25%  -
Overall Progress
Comment
1 out of 4 collective grievances and disputes received were resolved during the 1st quarter.
RESTRICTED

49. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Percentage compliance with DOD training targets
(Number of PSAP attending training programmes) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -  -
100%
(2 587)
Actual
13%
327 PSAP members were trained during the 1st quarter.
Overall Progress
(327)
RESTRICTED

50. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Percentage compliance with planned staffing of funded posts Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
(80 064)
Actual
96%
77 007 of DOD planned funded posts were staffed at the end of June 2016.
Overall Progress
(77 007)
RESTRICTED

51. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Number of positions filled against allocated quota for international institutions Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target - 12
Actual
12 
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

52. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Percentage compliance with DOD training targets (Non-combat professional military development courses) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
(3 000)
Actual
30%
(909)
Overall Progress
(909) 
RESTRICTED

53. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Percentage compliance with DOD training targets (Re-skilling) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
70%
Actual
18%
Overall Progress
18% 
RESTRICTED

54. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Percentage compliance with DOD training targets (National Youth Service programme) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
(2 000)
Actual
41%
(829)
Overall Progress
(829) 
RESTRICTED

55. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Number of military skills development members in the system per year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
4 001
Actual
3 937
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

56. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Human Resources Support Services
Number of reserve force persondays Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
Actual
Overall Progress  
RESTRICTED

57. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Legal Services
Percentage litigation cases finalised in the best interest of the DOD Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
50%
Actual
100% 
Overall Progress
Comment
22 Cases were received of which 6 cases were finalised as follows:
3 Cases were settled in favour.
1 Case was won.
2 Cases were removed from roll.
(6/6 = 100%)
RESTRICTED

58. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Legal Services
Percentage of cases of Corruption and Fraud prosecuted Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
40%
Actual 0%
Overall Progress
0% 
RESTRICTED

59. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Legal Services
Percentage reduction of military court cases outstanding (backlog) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target  - -
60%
Actual
9% 
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

60. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Legal Services
Percentage military court cases finalised (in-year) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
40%
Actual 8%
Actual 
Overall Progress
8% 
RESTRICTED

61. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Legal Services
Percentage of disciplinary cases in the DOD finalised within 90 days (Military Disciplinary Cases) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
Actual
4% 
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

62. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Inspection and Audit Services
Internal Audit Division
Percentage of recommendations agreed to by management to address the internal control gaps identified in audit reports Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
100%
Actual
69%  -
Overall Progress
69%
Comment
Completed reports were presented to the AMT and will also be presented to the Audit Committee and Management.
Deviation due to a lack of Human Resources.
RESTRICTED

63. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Inspection and Audit Services
Internal Audit Division
Number of scope coordination meetings with internal and external assurance providers to reduce audit fatigue across the DOD Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target 3 12
Actual 2  -
Overall Progress 2
Comment
Meetings between IAD and AGSA discussing issues surrounding SDA.
Deviation due to a lack of Human Resources.
RESTRICTED

64. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Inspection and Audit Services
Defence Inspectorate Division
Percentage of Corruption and Fraud incidents detected for investigation Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
Actual
100% 
(10 incidents reported and detected for investigation).
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

65. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Inspection and Audit Services
Defence Inspectorate Division
Percentage of National Anticorruption Hotline (NACH) incidents detected for investigation Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
Actual
100% 
(Two incidents reported and detected for investigation).
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

66. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Inspection and Audit Services
Defence Inspectorate Division
Number of awareness activities on Corruption and Fraud Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target - 48
Actual
12 
Overall Progress
12  
RESTRICTED

67. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Inspection and Audit Services
Defence Inspectorate Division
Level of DOD Morale Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
Positive
Actual
Ongoing 
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

68. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Acquisition Services
Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule
(Defence Intangible Capital Assets Management Policy status) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
A functioning ICA Management Organisation (Policy implementation and monitoring)
Actual
The IA policy will be submitted to the Policy Board for recommendation after DOD Legal Services provided inputs.
Overall Progress
IA Management Organisation has been established.
Comment
The ICA policy will be renamed to IA policy afterwards.
RESTRICTED

69. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Acquisition Services
Percentage armament acquisition commitments approved Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
≥75% by 31 Mar of each year
Actual
67,8%
Overall Progress
67,8% 
RESTRICTED

70. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Acquisition Services
Percentage technology development commitments approved Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
85% - 100% by 31 March of each
Year
85% - 100% by 31 Mar of each year
Actual
82,8% 
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

71. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Communication Services (HOC)
Status of public opinion of the DOD Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
77%
Actual
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

72. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
SANDF Command and Control
Number of Strategic Activities per annum Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target 3 12
Actual 4  -
Overall Progress
Comment:
One visit was unscheduled and unplanned.
RESTRICTED

73. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Religious Services
Number of Covenantal relationships with Religious stakeholders (Religious Advisory Boards) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target 2 1 5
Actual 1  -
Overall Progress
1  
Comment:
One meeting to be rolled-over to the 2nd quarter.
RESTRICTED

74. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Defence Reserve Direction
Number of marketing events to promote the Reserves Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target 9 36
Actual
10  -
Overall Progress
Comment:
The NASREC Career Exhibition was an ad-hoc event that was not planned for. 
RESTRICTED

75. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Defence Foreign Relations
Total number of Defence Attaché Offices Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target - 46
Actual
44 
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

76. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Defence International Affairs Division
Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule
(Policy products in pursuit of Defence Diplomacy) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
Ensure 100% relevant, quality policy products
Actual
Ensured 100% relevant quality policy products.
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

77. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Defence International Affairs Division
Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule
(Defence International Affairs Policy Status) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
(Monitor Policy Implementation)
Actual
Draft policy is in the consultation process to be finalised and promulgated during the FY2016/17.
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

78. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Defence International Affairs Division
Percentage deployments including training exercises, where applicable, supported with appropriate legal instruments Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
100% Appropriate approved legal instrument to be in place.
100%
Appropriate approved legal instrument to be in place.
Actual
Appropriate approved legal instrument in place. -
Overall Progress
RESTRICTED

79. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Programme 2:
Force Employment

80. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Force Employment
Percentage compliance with number of ordered commitments (External operations) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
100%
Actual
100%  -
Overall Progress

81. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Force Employment
Number of landward sub-units deployed on border safeguarding per year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target 15
Actual
15  -
Overall Progress

82. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Force Employment
Percentage compliance with number of ordered commitments (Internal Operations) (Safety and Security Support) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
100%
Actual -
Overall Progress
100% 

83. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Force Employment
Percentage compliance with number of ordered commitments (Internal Operations) (Disaster Aid and Disaster Relief) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
100%
Actual
100%  -
Overall Progress

84. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Force Employment
Percentage compliance with number of ordered commitments (Internal Operations) (Search and Rescue) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
100%
Actual
100%  -
Overall Progress

85. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Force Employment
Percentage compliance with the Southern African Development Community Standby Force Pledge Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
Actual
100% 
Overall Progress

86. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Force Employment
Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule (Sub-strategy, to support overarching strategy by securing land, airspace and maritime borders [Border Safeguarding Strategy]) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -  -
Sub-strategy approved
Actual
In process 
Overall Progress

87. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Force Employment
Number of joint, interdepartmental, interagency and multinational military exercises conducted per year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target 1 2 4
Actual 0  -
Overall Progress
Comment:
Ex IBSAMAR, that was scheduled for the 1st quarter was moved to the left and took place in the 4th quarter of FY2015/16. Ex IBSAMAR will be replaced by Ex NDLOVU that will take place in the 2nd quarter of FY2016/17 together with Ex WAYSIDE 1.

88. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Programme 3:
Landward Defence

89. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Landward Defence
Percentage compliance with number of ordered commitments (General Military Assistance) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
100%
Actual
100%  -
Overall Progress

90. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Landward Defence
Percentage compliance with DOD training targets Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
(162) 6%
(608)
22%
(280)
10%
(1 162)
42%
(2 214)
80%
Actual
32%
(891)  -
Overall Progress
Comment
The over-achievement is due to incorrect quarterly targets submitted during the planning process for publishing the DOD’s Annual Performance Plan.

91. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Programme 4:
Air Defence

92. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Air Defence
Number of force employment hours flown per year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
5 000
Actual
F Empl:
VIP:  
Overall Progress  

93. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Air Defence
Percentage compliance with DOD training targets Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
(187)
20.16%
(184)
19.83%
(207)
22.32%
(164)
17.69%
(742)
80%
Actual
18.98%
(176)  -
Overall Progress
Comment:
Due to the MSD intake scheduled for the 2nd quarter, the Basic Military Training course was cancelled. An over-and-above NCO Development Course was presented.

94. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Programme 5:
Maritime Defence

95. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Maritime Defence
Number of hours at sea per year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
12 000
Actual  
Overall Progress

96. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Maritime Defence
Percentage compliance with DOD training targets Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
(245)
48%
(57)
10%
(118)
22%
(18) 3%
(438)
80%
Actual
21%
(117) -
Overall Progress
(117) 
Comment:
Moderation and quality control still to be finalised for MTR 1 and 3 Learning Opportunities.

97. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets Military Health Support
Programme 6:
Military Health Support

98. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Military Health Support
Number of health care activities per year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
Actual -
Overall Progress   
Comment:
The target is projected and based on the trends of the demands for healthcare services of the past six years. The shortage of some specialist health care services, the refurbishment of 1 Military Hospital and the shortage of health care practitioners in the geographic healthcare facilities remain to lead to outsourcing of healthcare-related services.

99. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Military Health Support
Percentage compliance with DOD training targets Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
(123)
15%
(181)
22%
(344)
43%
(0) 0%
(648)
80%
Actual
24%
(195) -
Overall Progress
(195) 
Comment:
More members were accepted on courses in the 4th quarter of FY2015/16 to address the current backlog in courses. Most of the courses were finalised during the period under review resulting in more learners that successfully completing courses than the planned target.

100. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Programme 7:
Defence Intelligence

101. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Defence Intelligence
Percentage compliance with number of ordered commitments (General Military Assistance) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
100%
Actual
100%  -
Overall Progress
100%  

102. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Defence Intelligence
Percentage compliance with DOD governance promulgation schedule (Develop Cyber warfare strategy) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -  -
100%
(Submit for approval by the JCPS Cluster Ministers)
Actual
In process 
Overall Progress

103. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Defence Intelligence
Percentage compliance with DOD governance promulgation schedule (Sensor Strategy) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target  - -
100%
(Develop Strategy)
Actual
100% 
Overall Progress

104. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Defence Intelligence
Number of defence intelligence products Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
112
448
Actual
193  -
Overall Progress
Comment:
The over achievement is attributed to the security situation on the African continent and subsequent increase of intelligence requirements. 

105. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Defence Intelligence
Number of vetting decisions taken in accordance with requirements Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
1 625
6 500
Actual
899  -
Overall Progress
899  
Comment:
Inadequate staff hampers the production level of the Directorate. Vetting qualified personnel are overstretched as some members are also seconded to SADIC as facilitators to run the Security Vetting Course at Fontana.

106. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Defence Intelligence
Level of Implementation of the Cyber Warfare plan Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
Phase 2-3
Actual
In process 
Overall Progress

107. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Programme 8:
General Support

108. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Joint Logistic Services
Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule (DOD Procurement Policy status) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
Target -
100%
(Submission of DOD Procurement Policy for approval)
Actual
0%. In process 
Overall Progress

109. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Joint Logistic Services
Percentage adherence to DOD governance promulgation schedule (Overarching Logistic Strategy status) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
(Completed)
Actual
0%. In process
Overall Progress
0%. In process 

110. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Joint Logistic Services
Percentage procurement requests fully completed within 90 days from day of registration Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
21%
24%
25%
95%
Actual
25%  -
Overall Progress
Comment:
Due to the fact that the 90-day period has not expired by the end of the 1st quarter, all the requests completed are inherently within the 90-day period. 

111. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Joint Logistic Services
Percentage utilisation of endowment property in the DOD Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -  -
90%
Actual
96% 
Overall Progress

112. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Command and Management Information Systems
Percentage of modernised, sustainable DOD ICT Integrated Prime Systems Capabilities Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
25,65%
23,8%
22,88%
21,12%
92,45%
Actual
23.09%  -
Overall Progress
23.09%
Comment:
The Service Provider did not deliver ICT Capability Project Milestones according to the Charter and Plan.
Information Warfare (IW) assistance programme requirements were not completed and paid for.

113. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Military Police Capability
Projected number of deliberate crime prevention operations Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target 31
124
Actual 44 -
Overall Progress
Comment:
Combination of personnel from other sections and working together with other sections have ensured that this target is overachieved. 

114. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Military Police Capability
Percentage criminal cases investigated (backlog) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target
10%
40%
Actual
24% -
Overall Progress
Comment:
Prosecution Counsel at LEGSATOs, Area Provost Marshals and Head of Investigation managed to refer more criminal cases to civilian courts in the absence of appointed Judges for trial and decisions which resulted in more old case dockets being investigated and finalised.

115. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Military Police Capability
Percentage criminal cases investigated (in-year) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
50%
Actual
22.8%
Overall Progress
22.8% 

116. Summary of Quarterly Performance Targets
Military Police Capability
Percentage of cases of Corruption and Fraud investigated Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Annual target
Target -
100%
Actual
Overall Progress

117. Overall Achievement Note: Excluding 29 SANDF Annual Targets.
1st Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
4th Quarter
MOD
Def Sec
SANDF
Green 7
(100%) 31
(88%) 17
(74%)
Amber - 2
(6%)
Red 6
(26%)
Total Targets 35
23*
Note: Excluding 29 SANDF Annual Targets.
RESTRICTED

118. Financial Performance Information
1st QPR FY2016/17
Financial Performance Information
CONFIDENTIAL

119. Summary of State of Expenditure for the year to date: 30 June 2016
DOD Planned expenditure: 22.1%
R'000
Budget Allocation
47,169,745
Less: Expenditure
10,843,280
Total Amount Available
36,326,465
Percentage Expenditure (Paid)
23.0%
CONFIDENTIAL

120. Summary of State of Expenditure for the year to date per Programme: 30 June 2016
CONFIDENTIAL

121. Summary of State of Expenditure for the year to date per Programme: 30 June 2016
CONFIDENTIAL

122. Comment on State of Expenditure for the year to date per Programme: 30 June 2016
The unaudited expenditure (paid) of Defence as at 30 June 2016 was R billion (23.0%) against the approved planned expenditure of R billion (22.1%) from a R billion appropriated budget resulting in an over expenditure of R417.1 million (4.0%).
Factors that contributed to negative or positive balances of more than 8% of actual drawings per programme are as follows:
Administration. Over expenditure of R91.7 million (8.5%) was mainly due to the payment of devolved funds for accommodation charges to the Department of Public Works which was not included in the original cash flow plan submitted.
Force Employment. Under expenditure of R86.9 million (11.0%) was mainly due to the outstanding payment of the internal claim to the SAAF for the Rooivalk and Oryx helicopters that are deployed in the DRC as part of the Force Intervention Brigade.
General Support. Over expenditure of R102.9 million (9.4%) was mainly due to the payment made to the Department of Public works for services rendered regarding the repair and maintenance programme as well as the payment made to SITA regarding the computer services rendered.
CONFIDENTIAL

123. Summary of State of Expenditure for the year to date per Economic Classification: 30 June 2016
CONFIDENTIAL

124. Summary of State of Expenditure for the year to date per Economic Classification: 30 June 2016
CONFIDENTIAL

125. Comments of State of Expenditure for the year to date per Economic Classification: 30 June 2016
Factors that contributed to negative or positive balances of more than 8% of actual drawings per economic classification are as follows:
Goods and Services. Over expenditure of R186.4 (9.2%) was mainly due to:
The payment of devolved funds for accommodation charges to the Department of Public Works.
Higher than anticipated expenditure regarding medical outsourcing.
Payment made to SITA regarding the computer services rendered in terms of the Service Level Agreements.
CONFIDENTIAL

126. Comments of State of Expenditure for the year to date per Economic Classification: 30 June 2016
Payments for Capital Assets. The over expenditure of R114.9 million (437.4%) was mainly due to accrual payments from FY2015/16 for the mobility packages used in operations, DPW capital works programme and passenger motor vehicles.
Payments for Financial Assets. The over expenditure of R0.5 million (100%) was mainly due to transactions that create or increase outstanding debtors’ amounts as well as foreign exchange losses, thefts and other losses, etc. It is to be noted that funds are reserved for this purpose and will be part of the final virement at year-end.
CONFIDENTIAL

127. Defence Review Milestone 1 Implementation Progress
1st QPR FY2016/17
Defence Review Milestone 1 Implementation Progress
CONFIDENTIAL

128. Defence Review 2015 Milestone 1 Implementation Progress
End State 1: Sustained Ordered Defence Commitments
Deliverable
Detail of Actual Achievement
Sustained Peace Missions
Op MISTRAL – UN PSO in DRC Op COPPER – Anti Piracy Operation in support of the Mozambique government
Sustained Intervention Operations
None at the present moment
Sustained Support to Government Departments
Op PROSPER – Support to Government Departments, mainly to the SAPS Op CHARIOT – Disaster Aid and Relief. Op ARABELLA – Search and Rescue
International Commitments
Promulgated Joint Force Employment Strategy
Joint Operations Division currently in the process of developing the Framework for the Strategy.
Promulgated Border Safeguarding Strategy
Joint Operations Division currently in process of developing the Framework for the Strategy.
In its final outcome it will be a DOD corporate level strategy and will be developed using JWP 132: Planning at the Military Strategic Level Process.
Promulgated Military Strategy
D Mil Strat concluded Part 1 of the Military Strategy.

129. Defence Review 2015 Milestone 1 Implementation Progress
End State 2: Defence Capabilities Developed and Sustained
Deliverable
Detail of Actual Achievement
Promulgated Acquisition of Armaments in the DOD Policy (DAP 1000 Policy)
DAP 1000 policy consists of the Ministerial Directive, the Department of Defence Instruction (DODI) and the Acquisition Manual.
The Ministerial Directive was approved.
DODI (DODI/00121 Edition 4) currently with Defence Policy, Strategy and Planning Division for final vetting.
The Acquisition Manual is complete and promulgated by C Def Mat. The document is currently with the CEO of ARMSCOR for promulgation for use by ARMSCOR.
Promulgated Defence Industry Policy
This is the Deliverable of the National Defence Industry Council (NDIC) responsibility C Def Mat only provide support as and when required.
The first NDIC meeting was held on 18 May Work streams were structured to address amongst others the Defence Industry Strategy and Planning. C Def Mat provided interim secretarial services in support of the NDIC during the past quarter.
CONFIDENTIAL

130. Defence Review 2015 Milestone 1 Implementation Progress
Deliverable
Detail of Actual Achievement
End State 3: Defence Facilities Maintained
Defence Facility Facilities, Information Maintained through the implementation of the long term infrastructure and the Capital Plans
NDPW as the Custodian of all immovable assets vested in National Government, is responsible for the execution of the Planned Maintenance, Capital Works, Refurbishment and Decentralised Works Programmes on behalf of the DOD.
DOD currently only mandated to perform day-to-day (emergency) maintenance on immovable assets..
The planned expenditure for the various programmes, being executed by NDPW for FY2016/17, is as follows: Planned Maintenance: Rm 233,7; Capital Works: Rm 232,5; Refurbishment: Rbn1,006; Decentralised: Rm 52,4. The current payment figures for the various programmes are as follows: Planned Maintenance: Rm 29,7; Capital Works: Rm 17,8; Refurbishment: Rm 90,7; Decentralised: Rm 0.
These payment are well below the expected figure for the 1st quarter and indicate a under-expenditure of the budget. The projected under-expenditure is mainly due to supply chain challenges within NDPW as well as challenges experienced with certain appointed contractors.
The planned expenditure figures for 2016/17 will be reviewed and updated on completion of the budget re-allocation exercise that NDPW Head Office holds with its Regional Offices at the end of June The expenditure figures will be monitored on a monthly basis and where necessary, discussions will be held with the Key Account Manager (KAM) at NDPW Head Office to expedite the expenditure process.
RESTRICTED

131. Defence Review 2015 Milestone 1 Implementation Progress
Deliverable
Detail of Actual Achievement
End State 3: Defence Facilities Maintained
Optimised utilisation of the DOD Works Capability
976 members have been trained and qualified as artisans, technicians, site supervisors and project managers in various fields and are involved in non-operational activities.
Continuous training and skilling of artisans is taking place. 676 members are in different phases of artisan training (Intake: , 2014, 2015 and 2016). The 2015/16 Artisan intake training is decentralised to the Regional Works Units (RWUs). The 9 RWUs, covering each of the 9 provinces, are currently undertaking 67 "own resource" projects. DW Fmn capability has been utilised at 1 Military Hospital with the demolition of the 1st floor of 1 Military hospital in order to accommodate more medical theatres.
The DW Capability is currently 74.6% staffed. The DW Fmn structures have been finalised and submitted to C Log for further processing. Once the structures have been promulgated and approved, they, once staffed, should further optimise the functions of DOD Works Capability.
RESTRICTED

132. Defence Review 2015 Milestone 1 Implementation Progress
Deliverable
Detail of Actual Achievement
End State 4: Restructuring of the SANDF
Promulgated Blue-print force design
Part 2 of the Military Strategy (Blue-Print Force Design) was drafted in consultation and collaboration with Service representatives.
The force design will be based on the required and realistic interim end states for each Milestone in the force development trajectory and will optimise the military concepts against new plausible scenarios
Promulgated Restructuring plan
The SANDF Restructuring Work Group has been re-established viz C SANDF Instr 76/2015 dd 4 Dec 15 and is proceeding with this task as directed by CSANDF.
The restructuring plan will only be finalised once the Defence Review 2015 Plan to Arrest the Decline, which serves as higher order guidance for any restructuring activities within the DOD, is approved and promulgated.
Discussions have taken place between the Chairpersons of the Permanent Military Work Team and the Restructuring Work Group and the identified boundary management issues have been resolved.
The SANDF Restructuring Work Group has developed a process to develop a restructuring plan for the SANDF. The performance indicator and data sheet will be completed by 1 Aug 16 and a draft restructuring plan will be formulated for internal consultation.
CONFIDENTIAL

133. Defence Review 2015 Milestone 1 Implementation Progress
Deliverable
Detail of Actual Achievement
End State 5: DOD Human Resource Management
Promulgated HR Strategy
The Annual Implementation Plan (AIP) of the HR Development Strategy was distributed to all Services and Divisions for implementation by end of FY2016/17.
End State 6: Defence Academy established
Comprehensive appreciation on the establishment of a Defence Academy
Services and Divisions were requested to provide inputs.
A number of stakeholder engagements have been conducted as part of the investigation and appreciation process.
End State 7: Military Discipline Enhanced
Submitted Military Discipline Bill to the Office of the Chief State Law Advisor and undergo Socio-economic Environmental Impact Assessment System
The Team engaged the Development Committee (DevComm) of the JCPS Cluster Committee in an ad hoc meeting on 16 May The DevComm deferred approval for the MDB to serve before the JCPS Cluster Committee.
The DevComm identified a number of reservations that require further attention. Those matters have been addressed. The MDB served before the JCPS Cluster Committee on 07 June The DevComm chairperson reported on the MDB and noted that it was still to serve before the DevComm and further directions were given to the DoD.
Further consultation with stakeholders is required to comply with the compulsory SEIAS process. 14 letters of invitation have been signed by the Secretary for Defence and delivered to stakeholders for comments and or inputs on the draft Bill. Comments and/or inputs are awaited.
CONFIDENTIAL

134. Defence Review 2015 Milestone 1 Implementation Progress
Deliverable
Detail of Actual Achievement
End State 8: Relationship established between the DOD ETD programmes and accredited tertiary Institutions for civilian and military members
Promulgated Education Training
and Development
Policy
Stellenbosch University is the Accreditation partner for the Junior Officer education program pursued through the Dean of FMS (Faculty of Military Sciences)
Wits University and UNISA were approached to support the on-going requirement for advanced Officer education and UNISA for advanced NCO education.
The full process of partnership and accreditation is a long term process which requires the involvement of the Council of Higher Education (CHE), Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET) and the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA).
End State 9: Defence Funding Model Developed
Developed Defence Funding
A professional services company was appointed to assist the Department with the development of the policy and strategy for development of the Defence Funding Model. An initiation meeting was held and the company was provided with the initial source documents to guide the development of the project plan. Quarterly progress reports will be provided and progress will be monitored accordingly.
Promulgated Budgeting and Costing Tool
The members that will be serving on an IPT have been identified and an HR-process has been initiated to call up the members to assist. The project team leader will present a plan to the DRIPT on how the Budgeting and Costing Tool will unfold. The Budgeting and Costing Tool is a permanent agenda point at the DRIPT meeting.
CONFIDENTIAL

135. Defence Review 2015 Milestone 1 Implementation Progress
End State 10: Defence Industry Engagements Established
Deliverable
Detail of Actual Achievement
Capability and technology programmes established with the defence industry
Capability Programmes established with the Defence Industry:
Landward Defence Capability
Common Weapons Capability
Special Forces
Air Defence
Maritime
Military Health Support
Technology Programmes established with the Defence Industry:
Landward Technology Programme
Maritime Technology Programme
Aerospace Technology Programme
Support Operations Technology Programme
Electronics Technology Programme
Special Operations Technology Programme
Scientific Research and Science & Engineering Capacity Development Initiative
CONFIDENTIAL

136. Defence Review 2015 Milestone 1 Implementation Progress
Deliverable
Detail of Actual Achievement
End State 11: Costed Implementation Plan for Milestone 1 of the SA Defence Review 2015
Promulgated (Implemented) SA Defence Review MS1 Overarching Implementation Plan, Targets and Timelines
The Military and Secretariat planning teams participated in the capability development analysis process to unpack and develop the MS1 Priorities and Force Design for the implementation of the Defence Review 2015.
A template was developed against which the Secretariat Planning Team (SPT) and Military Planning Team (MPT) have captured and collated all the planning data in a way that will provide management information at all levels to enable the development of the DOD MS1 Plan to arrest the decline.
The first order narrative of the DOD MS1 Plan has been drafted and is being further developed, amended and refined and the costed part of the plan is being finalised.
The two teams are in the process of finalising the “Department of Defence Costed Recovery Plan to Arrest the Decline”. This plan is work in progress and in the final consultation process with Services and Divisions.
CONFIDENTIAL

137. Defence Review 2015 Milestone 1 Implementation Progress
Deliverable
Detail of Actual Achievement
End State 12: Strategic Communication Intervention
Roll out of a SA Defence Review 2015 Communication Plan (internal and external stakeholders)
The Defence Review 2015 Communication Plan for Internal and External stakeholders was presented at the DOD Work Session in May by the Head of Communication and is in the process of being implemented by means of internal communication actions (Info-bulletins, Articles in SA Soldier) and external communication actions like media liaison actions.
Promulgated Communication Strategy
Communication strategy for was approved and is implemented by means of internal and external communication actions, with a focus on MOD&MV priority areas, Sec Def and C SANDF focus areas.
CONFIDENTIAL

138. Thank You
Questions
RESTRICTED