1. Rural Education Achievement Program
A guide to success with this new program!

2. Rural Education Achievement Program (REAP)
Part one, the Small and Rural Schools Achievement Program, authored by AASA with the help of NREA, made it into law a year and a half ago, for the first time.
Part two, the Rural and Low-income Schools program, will help larger rural districts.
11/28/2018
AASA

3. Why Rural? Why Small?
The small and rural schools program was conceived by AASA to make the limited amount of federal money small, rural school districts receive easy to use and more effective.
In addition, small rural districts tend to receive less federal funding than their suburban and urban counterparts.
11/28/2018
AASA

4. Who is Eligible for the Small & Rural Schools Achievement Program?
Eligible districts have an ADA of 600 or fewer or the county in which the district resides has fewer than 10 people per square mile.
AND
Defined as rural by the US Department of Education. Rural for USED means having a local code of 7 or 8.
11/28/2018
AASA

5. Who is Eligible for the Rural and Low-Income School Program?
Eligible districts have a census poverty count of 20% or more.
AND
Have US Department of Education Locale code of 6, 7 or 8. Locale code 6 translates to a small town.
11/28/2018
AASA

6. What is a Johnson Locale Code?
This coding system based on both the proximity to metropolitan areas and on population size and density.
Codes are assigned based on the addresses of the individual schools and are assigned at the school level.
Ranges from 1 (urban) to 8 (rural)
11/28/2018
AASA

7. Rural Alternative Definition (aka Waiver)
Applicable to Small and Rural Schools Achievement program only. Proved necessary for those states using P.O. Boxes for districts. Not accurate zip code.
The identity of the State government agency that established the definition; and
An indication of the SEA’s concurrence that the use of the definition and inclusion of the LEA in the Small, Rural School Achievement Program is appropriate.
11/28/2018
AASA

8. How Does Subpart One Work?
Can co-mingle funds from Titles II (Teacher & Technology), IV (Safe & Drug Free) and V (Innovative Block Grant)
Can spend them in I, II, III (Bilingual and Emergency Immigrant), IV (added 21st Century Grant) or V.
11/28/2018
AASA

9. How does the formula work?
Provides a supplemental grant with a min. of $20,000 to max. of $60,000.
Formula $20,000 for first 50 students plus $100 for each additional student up to $60,000.
Subtract allocations in Titles II, IV, VI (old Title #’s) or Titles II, IV, V (new Title #’s)
11/28/2018
AASA

10. A Formula Example Biggers – Reyno School District, AR
ADA 211 students
$20,000 (50) + $16,100 (161) = $36,100
Total federal formula funds: $13,610
School Year
Includes Titles II, IV and VI (class size too!)
Far right column of state spreadsheet
$36,100 - $13,610 = $22,490 if fully funded!
Actually received $18,506 (about 18% less)
11/28/2018
AASA

11. What did the application look like?
Online application – e-grants.ed.gov
Asked for contact information for district
3 other items of information
Dun & Bradstreet #
NCES code
Tax Identification #
Two Certifications – (S&DF and Debt)
Had to fax signature to DoE
Check award amount:
11/28/2018
AASA

12. How to keep these new dollars?
With all new money comes some accountability.
Districts must comply with Title I assessment provisions.
3-5, 6-9, in reading and math
2005 – 2006: 3 – 8 reading and math
After three years, district must meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements of Title I
11/28/2018
AASA

13. Adequate Yearly Progress
New formula to determine school success.
12 years = 100% proficiency
Scores must be disaggregated into major sub-groups. (95% rule)
States are allowed to set the bar.
Will have to work with state to determine alternative AYP definition.
11/28/2018
AASA

14. How to keep these new dollars? (cont’d)
If, after 3 years, district does not meet AYP, district can continue to participate but can only use REAP money for school improvement purposes.
If, after 3 years, the district meets AYP, they are free to continue.
11/28/2018
AASA

15. Federal Accountability!
The Department of Education will request the answers to the following questions from all participating districts:
What dollars did you consolidate?
How did you use the consolidated dollars?
How did you use the new dollars?
Should be expected in the next few months and will occur through an on-line form.
11/28/2018
AASA

16. Rural & Low-income School Program
Program was developed by states that have county-wide districts that include rural areas, but also benefits larger rural districts.
Program is administered through the state. State determines how dollars are distributed to local districts.
5% kept at state for administration.
11/28/2018
AASA

17. State choices for distribution
On a competitive basis
According to a formula based on the number of students
According to a formula that more highly targets the dollars to needy districts
Pre-approved by US Dept. of Ed
Most states are distributing through the formula based on number of students.
11/28/2018
AASA

18. Uses for new funding… Teacher recruitment/ retention
Teacher professional development
Educational technology (software too!)
Parental involvement activities
Safe and Drug Free Schools
Title I, Part A
Bilingual and Emergency Immigrant (Title III)
11/28/2018
AASA

19. Application Process
State provides eligibility information to Dept. of Ed by March 1st.
States apply through consolidated application or through a separate application.
Local district can apply if state chooses not to apply. (However, all states applied)
Most states received dollars by earlier this summer.
Check for eligibility at:
11/28/2018
AASA

20. How to keep this money Federal accountability at state level only.
State must submit a report…
How grants were awarded
How districts and schools used funds
Degree of progress made towards goals in initial application
State may add requirements for districts to complete for the state report.
11/28/2018
AASA

21. Money, Money, Money…
Most districts are now benefiting from FY 2002 level of $162.5 million.
President’s Bush called for elimination of REAP.
Told it does not provide new benefit.
Was duplicative of NCLB provisions.
Senate Appropriations Committee has restored funding at increase of $175 million.
11/28/2018
AASA

22. Money, Money, Money… (cont’d)
The House is pushing to stick with the President’s funding levels in his budget.
Democrats and Republican Moderates and pushing for additional education dollars.
Stalemate has caused Congress to go home for campaigning without completing the spending bills.
Continuing Resolutions (CRs) are passed to keep the government in business without completed spending bills.
Maintain last years funding level.
REAP should assume $162.5 million for the present.
Make sure you thank your Senators and Representatives.
11/28/2018
AASA

23. Write a letter…
We need to get the message to President Bush that REAP dollars are needed.
Please include the amount of new money you received, how it benefited your district and what impact your district would feel without the dollars.
Send it to:
Ms. Kathryn Stack
Office of Management & Budget
725 17th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20503
FAX!!!
11/28/2018
AASA

24. Resource Page
REAP information page can be found at…
Mary Conk Kusler
Legislative Specialist
AASA
1801 N. Moore Street
Arlington, VA 22209
(703)
11/28/2018
AASA