1. Class III Estimate for Regional Consolidation
Shelby
Class III Estimate for Regional Consolidation
Riverbend Water Resource District

2. Phasing Diagram Shelby Industrial Raw Water Demand 10 MGD by 2026
Raw Water Capacity 30
by 2031 13
MGD - lowest immediate demand
Industrial Use 40
by 2036 50
15MGD reuse treatment 60
Member cities transfer 1A
2026
30 MGD multi-level takeoff
New Boston 1B
DeKalb I
Clarksville 2A
2031
60 MGD intake tunnel
(3+1) X 10 MGD = 30 MGD
High Service Pumping (3+1) X 8.3 MGD 2B
2036 3A
2045
Raw Water Supply Line - 60 MGD
8.3 MGD WTP Treatment Train
Upgrade 3B
2055
(2) X 10 MGD = 20 MGD
X MGD Ground Storage
WTP to Riverbend TieIn
Raw Water Flow to WTP
Riverbend WTP to Redwater
Alt 4B
(1) X 10 MGD = 10 MGD ?
+2X10
Redwater Elevated tank 20
Flow Split Box
Annona to Clarksville
Existing
30 inch line repair/replace
(3+1) X 10 MGD = 30MGD
City of Annona
205,000
gal
+1X10
City of Avery
218,000
City of De Kalb
238,000
Central Bowie County
320,000
City of New Boston
698,000
(3+0) X 10 MGD = 30MGD
TAC
200,000
1,230,000
10 MGD WTP Treatment Train
3,585,000
1,100,000
City of Redwater (Phase II)
15,300,000
City of Redwater
12,500,000
Potable Water Production Capacity
53,000 25
upgrade to
27 +/-
30 +/-
Expand
by 2045
(?) X ? MGD = ? MGD
To IP
2.5 MGD WTP Treatment Train
Domino
Existing IP Intake and PS
Queen City
Atlanta
Shelby

3. Phasing Diagram
Shelby

4. Phase 1A and 1B (of modified alternative 3):
Raw water backbone to 60MGD
Raw water capacity at 30 MGD (10 MGD industrial/20 MGD water production)
25 MGD water production capacity
Distribution – TAC and New Boston
Shelby
Top Keys to Success" as 1. Listening 2. Hydraulics 3. Anticipating Operating Challenges 4. Long term view but short term solutions
KEEP Circling back

5. Phase 1A and 1B (of modified alternative 3):
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost, O&M Cost and Annual Expense Phase 1A&1B combined
Phase 1A and 1B (of modified alternative 3):
Raw water backbone to 60MGD
Raw water capacity at 30 MGD (10 MGD industrial/20 MGD water production)
25 MGD water production capacity
Distribution – TAC and New Boston
Matt
Wilson Creek LS?
DRAFT COSTS

6. Phase 4B –Potable Water supply 2.5 MGD water production capacity
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost, O&M Cost and Annual Expense Phase 4B
Phase 4B –Potable Water supply 2.5 MGD water production capacity
Raw water sidestream off IP raw water pump station
Pre-chlorination by IP
Distribution – serving Atlanta, Domino, and Queen City
Matt
Wilson Creek LS?
DRAFT COSTS

7. Replacing New Boston Rd. Capacity
Buildout
Replacing New Boston Rd. Capacity
Domestic potable Water - New Boston
TAC Industrial Demands
Ultimately serving:
Redwater, DeKalb, Central Bowie Co., Annona, Avery, Clarksville
Matt A
Listening – PIC, PM, Design Staff – Listen and understand Client needs
Anticipating Operating Challenges – Translates to knowing challenges
Hydraulic flexibility
Long term view
We need to include comments on Subs value

8. Buildout Phase 2A Phase 1A/1B Phase 1A Phase 2B Phase 1B Phase 4B
Matt A
Listening – PIC, PM, Design Staff – Listen and understand Client needs
Anticipating Operating Challenges – Translates to knowing challenges
Hydraulic flexibility
Long term view
We need to include comments on Subs value
Phase 4B

9. Opinion of Probable Construction Cost - All Phases
Construction Cost $124.3M, without distribution
Raw Water System supply to 120 MGD
Potable water production to 40 MGD
Cass County potable water production to 2.5 MGD
Industrial Reuse for 15 MGD
Potable water distribution for region
Matt
Wilson Creek LS?
Construction Cost $12.5M, without distribution
Total Capital Costs include: Engineering, Feasibility Studies, Finance, Legal and Bond Counsel. As well, these estimated costs include Power Connection, Land Acquisition and Survey, and interest during construction.
DRAFT COSTS

10. Capital Cost – O&M Cost – Debt Service
Operating and Maintenance Costs
Matt
Wilson Creek LS?
DRAFT COSTS