Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byScot Miles Modified over 6 years ago
1
Refinements to R4Q PF BUILDING BLOCKS FOR EFFECTIVE REGULATION
Bronwyn Weir ANZSOG – Regulators Community of Practice Sydney - 15 November 2018
2
Overview Background The BMF Assessment Relevance of the findings to other regulators
3
Background Inter Governmental Agreement Building Ministers Forum
National Construction Code Australian Building Codes Board Model Building Act Private Certification Performance Based Code Multi government Local and State Various State government bodies Interface with planning controls
4
Cladding Lacrosse Melb 2014 Grenfell June 2017 Symptom
Activity at state level Why has this occurred? Great fire of Rome 64 AD burnt for 6 days – wooden homes in narrow alley ways caused fire to spread from building to another Great fire of London 1666 burnt for 4 days wiping out 80% of the city – London adopted building regulations to require wider streets and walls of stone or brick
5
BMF Assessment Terms of Reference
8 building regulation schemes Previous reviews & inquiries Industry & Government Consultation 10 ‘problems’ Based on the assessment, make recommendations for a national best practice approach for the effective implementation of the NCC
6
The 10 problems Roles, responsibilities accountabilities of different parties Education and training Licensing & accreditation Accuracy of design and documentation Quality control and assurance
7
The 10 problems Competencies of practitioners
Integrity of private certification Inspection regimes Auditing and enforcement practices Product importation and chain of custody
8
Timetable for assessment
BMF met April – Report released Feedback & final consult Finalise report Jan/Feb 18 Closing date for written subs 20 December BMF met 11 Dec – Draft Report Consultations & assessment Oct/Nov 17 BMF met 6 Oct 17 Initial report Appointed end Aug 17
9
Performance-based Code
Benefits appear to outweigh negative impacts Performance-based decisions are opinion based High degree of transparency required High degree of competency required Enforceability requires clarity in interpretation
10
Modern construction practices
Rapid growth in high-rise construction Design and construct model does not match regulatory controls The sector has taken its own path Key decision makers – developers, project managers, designers Global markets for building products High risk buildings but very limited regulatory oversight Capacity of regulator Prevalence of private building surveyor
11
Role of private building surveyor
Regulated Commercial business Co-regulator Model differs across country- in all cases significant reliance is placed on certification by private surveyor Inherent potential for conflict – need effective controls Alignment (or lack of) with local government powers and functions
12
The recommendations Practitioners* Regulators*
Private building surveyors* Documentation* Inspections of building work Fire safety systems Implementation
13
Building Practitioners
Recommendations 1-4 Who to register Harmonise requirements for entry Existing practitioners Building surveyors Problems Key players not required to be registered in some jurisdictions Lack of accountability Lack of competence Mutual recognition headaches Poor quality training – not enough education on NCC Continuing professional development
14
Regulators Address fragmentation through ‘Regulatory Practice Panel’
Recommendations 5-7 Address fragmentation through ‘Regulatory Practice Panel’ Full suite of powers to regulate Publish strategy for oversight of Commercial sector Problems Fragmentation Lack of collaboration Role of PBS as a co- regulator Powers not working together in practice Risk-based?
15
Private Building Surveyors
Recommendations 9-11 Clarifying independence Mitigating inherent conflict and auditing conduct Reinforcing role of PBS as a co-regulator Problems Conflict Lack of clarity of expectations – codes of conduct Role as co-regulator is perceived as secondary to commercial interests
16
Documentation Problems Poor quality Lack of capacity for intelligence
Future owners lacking key info Recommendations 13 & 20 Central repositories with common data points Building owners manual Using new technologies Various controls to improve quality
17
Themes for Regulatory Practice
What to regulate? Fit for purpose Regulating ‘performance’ Private sector as a Co-regulator Multi-government
18
What to regulate? Federation National Laws Risk allocation
Role of industry – self-certification Economic benefits/costs Public interest
19
Fit for purpose Regulating the complexity of reality
Keeping up with the pace of change & innovation Certainty v flexibility Accessing intelligence to inform regulatory practice Relationship between policy and regulator
20
Regulating performance/outcomes-based
High risk Misinterpretation Lack of competency Lack of transparency Quantification/codes of practice Confidential or mandatory reporting (e.g.CROSS) Transparency & Accountability Roles and responsibilities Independent 3rd party review Proactive audit
21
Private sector co-regulators
Inherent conflict of interest Mitigating the conflict effectively Ethical standards Fine balance regulating with regulating against the co-regulator Risk sharing/insurance
22
Multi-government Local and various state government bodies
Collaboration & co-ordination Clear roles & responsibilities Information sharing & referrals Consensus around risk Joint stakeholder information and management
23
Key regulatory practice skills
Capability – operationalising policy Clear processes - decision making tools Confidence – clarity on risk What not to do! Proactive strategy Strategy that covers all regulatory activities – common language Risk profiling Intelligence led
24
bweir@weirlegalconsulting.com +61 417 105 640
Bronwyn Weir
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.