Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Long Association Task Force
Marisa Orbea, Task Force Chair IESBA Meeting September 15-16, 2015 New York, USA
2
Some comments on cooling-off periods for EQCR
Long Association Some comments on cooling-off periods for EQCR Proposal is reasonable and provides balanced approach Good job trying to steer down the middle Should be striving for harmonisation Too complex to apply Adding complexity is not in the Public Interest Concern about non-PIE approach with respect to banks Minimum only and should encourage higher standards
3
Some comments on cooling-off periods for EQCR
Long Association Some comments on cooling-off periods for EQCR EQCR role is different and additional year off non-PIEs will mean hardship for SMPs Consider what adoption and implementation will look like Do some work on illustrating what good practices look like Proposals should be re-exposed
4
Some comments on jurisdictional clause
Long Association Some comments on jurisdictional clause Deals with EU therefore supported Be clearer about pointing to EU situation to inform the discussion What should regulatory inspection regime look like? Can see logic but are objectives sufficiently similar between firm and partner rotation? Is Board comfortable with specificity of 10 years?
5
Some comments on activities during cooling-off
Long Association Some comments on activities during cooling-off Limited consultation clause not supported by some: Relationship continues to exist Clouds ultimate principle Off means off Don’t want someone in the background calling the shots
6
Some comments on activities during cooling-off
Long Association Some comments on activities during cooling-off But limited consultation also considered practical by a few: No evidence hasn’t worked in the UK Could be OK as long as not part of decision making Its about how it is implemented and deployed More audit quality delivered if right people involved and have the right safeguards Other restrictions generally supported
7
Is possibility of rotation of non-KAPs emphasised sufficiently?
Long Association Other comments Is possibility of rotation of non-KAPs emphasised sufficiently? Consider adding concurrence of TCWG in (the exemption could be a one off).
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.