1. Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting – Jammu & Kashmir on 16.04.2009
Ministry of HRD
Government of India
MDM-PAB Meeting – Jammu & Kashmir on 1

2. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Part-I
Review of Implementation of MDMS in Jammu & Kashmir (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Questions?
What is the level of unspent balances as on ?
How regular is the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains?
What is the level of lifting?
How about cooking cost? Was it disbursed to Districts? What is the level of its utilisation at school level?
How utilisation of food grains and cooking cost is synchronized?
How is the utilisation of foodgrains reconciled with the number of meals served?
…… contd
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

4. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Contd ….., Questions?
How much MME was utilized? Under what activities?
What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices?
Part –II
What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2007 to 2008?
How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data?
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

5. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Benchmarks
Target Coverage: 100% (Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served)
Desirable stock in hand : 10% (+ or - 5%)
Lifting of food grains as on : 85%
Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [ to ]: 74% (+ or – 10%)
Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is required to be lifted & distributed.
Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost should be synchronous.
State’s AWP&B should be in accordance with MHRD’s guidelines.
Data in the AWP&B should be authentic, reliable & based on the records. 5
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. No. of Schools Covered (PY + UP.PY)

7. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of children in Q1+Q2+Q3)
94% Covered
88% Covered
No. of children (In lakh)
114% Covered
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

8. No. of Children availing MDM (Primary)-JAMMU
MDM-PAB Approval (Target) Vs Average no. of Children Availed MDM (Achievement)
Sl. No.
Districts
Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for
Average No. of children availing MDM as on
Difference
No. of children %
LOW 1
Kathua
41115
30518
-10597
-26% 2
Kishtwar
29837
22971
-6866
-23% 3
Doda
47647
39967
-7680
-16% 4
Poonch
65097
57476
-7621
-12%
Excess
Jammu
44446
49268
+4822
11%

9. No. of Children availing MDM ( Upper Primary)-JAMMU
MDM-PAB Approval (Target) Vs Average no. of Children Availed MDM (Achievement)
Sl. No.
Districts
Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for
Average No. of children availing MDM as on
Difference
No. of children %
LOW 1
Jammu
21946
16485
-5461
-25% 2
Samba
10963
9604
-1359
-12% 3
Kathua
9384
8381
-1003
-11%

10. No. of Children availing MDM (Primary)-KASHMIR
MDM-PAB Approval (Target) Vs Average no. of Children Availed MDM (Achievement)
Sl. No.
Districts
Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for
Average No. of children availing MDM as on
Difference
No. of children %
LOW 1
Kargil
15652
7860
-7792
-50% 2
Kulgam
58808
37329
-21479
-37% 3
Srinagar
22528
16946
-5582
-25% 4
Ganderbal
30620
23542
-7078
-23% 5
Pulwama
35465
29744
-5721
-16% 6
Baramulla
87530
76176
-11354
-13% 7
Leh
5119
4468
-651 8
Shopian
25806
22743
-3063
-12%

11. No. of Children availing MDM ( Upper Primary)-KASHMIR
MDM-PAB Approval (Target) Vs Average no. of Children Availed MDM (Achievement)
Sl. No.
Districts
Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for
Average No. of children availing MDM as on
Difference
No. of children %
LOW 1
Srinagar
2217
1587
-630
-28% 2
Ganderbal
2509
1955
-554
-22% 3
Budgam
19912
16038
-3874
-19%

12. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of Working Days in Q1+Q2+Q3)
(100%)
No. of Working days
(61%)
74%)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

13. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of Meals in Q1+Q2+Q3)
Benchmark 74 %
meals to be served
meals served
No. of Meal (in Crore)
100%
74%
57%

14. Number of Meals ( PY + U PY)-JAMMU
MDM-PAB Approval (Target) Vs Meals actually served (Achievement)
Sl. No.
Districts
Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for ( In Cr.)
Meals actually served as on ( In Cr.)
Short-served
No. of meals % 1
Samba
-51% 2
Kishtwar
-41%

15. Number of Meals ( PY + U PY)-KASHMIR
MDM-PAB Approval (Target) Vs Meals actually served (Achievement)
Sl. No.
Districts
Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for ( In Cr.)
Meals actually served as on ( In Cr.)
Difference
No. of meals % 1
Kargil
598675
91% 2
Leh
423557
82% 3
Kulgam
57%

16. Foodgrains Lifting as per G.O.I. (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
Benchmark (74+10)%
43%
100%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

17. Foodgrains Lifting as per AWP&B 09-10
Foodgrains (in MTs)
Benchmark (74+10)%
100%
54%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

18. Foodgrains Lifting Mismatch (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
11% Excess
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

19. Food grains lifting Month-wise cumulative (Including USB*)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
Including unspent balance of 1739 MTs as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

20. Foodgrains Utilisation (Q1+Q2+Q3)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
Benchmark 74%
100%
47%
54%
Note : Availability (as per the AWP&B ) =
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

21. Cooking Cost Utilisation (1.4.2008 to 31.12.2008)
Benchmark 74%
100%
33%
67%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

22. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Mismatch in Utilisation of Foodgrains and Cooking cost (District-wise)-JAMMU
% Utilisation
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

23. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Mismatch in Utilisation of Foodgrains and Cooking cost (District-wise)-KASHMIR
% Utilisation 23
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

24. Reconciliation : No. of meals Vs Qty of foodgrains-JAMMU
Sl. No
District
No. of Meals served
(Cr)
Expected consumption of food grains (MTs)
Actual Consumption of food grains (MTs)
Deficit in %
Deficit Consumption 1
Rajouri
0.85
831.18
-37% 2
Poonch
1.31
948.18
-28% 3
Ramban
1.32
690.42
512.47
-26% 4
Kathua
0.83
753.03
593.30
-21%
There is no difference between expected & actual consumption Kashmir Division.

25. Reconciliation : No. of meals Vs Cooking Cost-JAMMU
(Rs. In Lakhs)
Sl. No
District
No. of Meals served (Cr.)
Expected consumption of Cooking cost
Actual Consumption of Cooking cost
Deficit in %
Deficit Consumption 1
Ramban
0.75
147.14
37.38
-75% 2
Udhampur
0.83
178.45
58.99
-67% 3
Kathua
1.32
164.45
58.56
-64% 4
Jammu
0.85
178.39
71.91
-60% 5
Rajouri
0.41
282.71
119.78
-58% 6
Reasi
177.42
78.61
-56% 7
Doda
0.16
177.26
90.88
-49% 8
Poonch
0.69
280.21
150.57
-46% 9
Samba
1.31
35.31
19.03

26. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Mismatch of Utilisation-AWP&B No of meals served, Cooking Cost, Foodgrains (Q1+Q2+Q3)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

27. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
MME Utilisation ( to )
100%
100%
As per the deficiency note reply : Expenditure ending DEC 08 was not reported from any source.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

28. Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
100%
100%
As per the deficiency note reply : Expenditure will be reported in the 4th Quarter.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

29. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Sheds)3% 3%
As per the deficiency note reply : 3107 kitchen sheds have been completed But information regarding expenditure is not provided.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

30. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Devices)
99%
99%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

31. Performance Score card – A Summary
Sl. No.
Component
Achievement
Benchmark 1.
Foodgrains Availability
47%
84% 2.
Foodgrains Utilisation
54%
74% 3.
Cooking Cost Utilisation
33% 4.
MME Utilisation
00%
75% 5.
Kitchen Shed construction
03%
100% 6.
Kitchen Devices procurement
99%
QPRs
0 nos.
3 nos.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

32. ISSUES
Confirmation of foodgrains lifted by state Govt. of Jammu & Kashmir from FCI for the period May, 08 to DEC.08 for Primary & Sept. 08 to Dec. 08 for Upper Primary is still awaited.
Information sought by the ministry is never sent/ sent late. QPRs for 3 Quarters have not been sent despite reminders. .

33. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2009-10
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

34. Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY)
04%
12%
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

35. Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB) Vs MDM
04%
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

36. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY)
04%
12%
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

37. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2008-09(UPPER PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

38. No Year As per DISE data As per MDM Sanctions 1 2006-07 208 231 2
No. of School days No
Year
As per DISE data
As per MDM Sanctions 1
208
231 2
213
196 3 NA 4
223(State Claim)

39. PAB’s Recommendations (2009-10)39

40. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Thank You
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India