Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Light Regional Council

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Light Regional Council"— Presentation transcript:

1 Light Regional Council
ADAC Implementation

2 Overview Drivers for electronic processing LGA R&D Funded Pilot
Experiences to Date Challenges for Implementation

3 Drivers

4 Drivers 1,000 Lots per year? 30 Lots per year

5 Freeling Estate - Stage 7 (33 Allotment Release)
LGA R&D Funded Pilot Freeling Estate - Stage 7 (33 Allotment Release) 3744m2 Road Surface 4262m2 Road Pavement 10 Pram Ramps 127.4m Spoon Drain 905m Kerb & Gutter 825m Footpath 1 Indented Car Park 4 Side Entry Pits 2 Junction Boxes 1 Grated Inlet Pit 7 Stormwater Allotment Connections 353m Stormwater Pipe 6 Sewer Flushing Points 24 Sewer Inspection Points 1 Sewer Manhole 123m Sewer pipe 1 Roundabout 3 Splitter Islands Choose between Slides 5 and 6 (slide 5 specifies the pit/node types) 10 hours to input

6 As-Constructed data provided as XML script
LGA R&D Funded Pilot As-Constructed data provided as XML script = As constructed data is provided to Council as drawing, but using blackbox22 turns to XML script

7 XML script read into FME to transform data
LGA R&D Funded Pilot XML script read into FME to transform data Software FME transforms the XML script to create excel tables and MapInfo tab files

8 Excel Output from FME for Conquest Input
LGA R&D Funded Pilot Excel Output from FME for Conquest Input VBA script Complicated asset register meant some manual input was still required – macros were developed to assist: The macros auto-fill from manual input. Lookup tables with condition codes, type codes, etc. complete the remainder of the missing fields. For kerbing and footpaths some fields can’t be completed through this and must be completed cell by cell.

9 LGA R&D Funded Pilot GIS Output from FME
Assets were output as individual MapInfo tab files. Surface and Pavement assets had to be drawn manually due to survey data incompatibility at the roundabout.

10 Manually drawn GIS vs. ADAC GIS output
LGA R&D Funded Pilot GIS Output from FME Manually drawn GIS vs. ADAC GIS output

11 Savings = Approx. 6 hours 30 minutes for 33 allotments
Experiences to Date XML script – some modifications (errors/omissions) FME – changes to match output requirements & resolve errors Excel VBA – macros developed to auto-fill from manual input Missing Assets & Fields – surfaces, pavement, kerbing & footpaths Runtimes: Savings = Approx. 6 hours 30 minutes for 33 allotments ADAC FME = 16.4 seconds Excel input + VBA = 15 minutes Manual input of missing assets = 3 hours Upload to Conquest = 10 minutes Manual Conquest + MapInfo Input = 10 hours Surfaces and pavements are complicated in our asset register (may be more suited in other set-ups), as well as traffic islands causing havoc for road centreline for the GIS – so at this stage still manual entry. Kerbing & Footpaths also have road segment data individual to each asset. More savings anticipated for larger developments.

12 Challenges for Implementation
Showing benefits to developers (faster Council processing = $) Upskilling required in all phases: Superintendent & Surveyor to produce good XML Council staff in managing FME and excel script Asset Register currently not well aligned to ADAC Less visual verification / potentially more difficult to spot errors Challenges that face ADAC will lessen with familiarity and as changes occur in practices (eg. asset register ‘clean-ups’) As we go on using and learning more, and with changes to systems for better integration, the synthesised ADAC process will be more and more efficient


Download ppt "Light Regional Council"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google