Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Palo Alto Grade Separation Financing White Paper

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Palo Alto Grade Separation Financing White Paper"— Presentation transcript:

1 Palo Alto Grade Separation Financing White Paper
presented to Palo Alto City Council Rail Committee Meeting presented by Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. November 29, 2017 Oakland Sacramento Denver Los Angeles Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. One Kaiser Plaza, Suite 1410, Oakland, CA • fax

2 Presentation Overview
Purpose and Context Project Cost Scenarios Types of Funding & Financing Considered Voter Approved Taxes Value Capture Tool Other Local Sources (not quantified) Regional Funding (e.g., Measure B) State and Federal Funding

3 Study Purpose and Context
Preliminary consideration (and quantification where possible) of potential grade separation funding and financing to inform the planning process Qualifications and Limitations Projections based on readily available information and generic assumptions Some sources may be politically infeasible and/or mutually exclusive Funding landscape is subject to change based on economic, political, legal, and other factors.

4 Preliminary Project Cost Scenarios
City’s own Model – CUBE. Compatible with all other modeling work in the area. Use of Synchro 8 – universally used software. Alma Street assumed connected in all cases. The study did not take the output from the model directly but combined it with up-to-date traffic counts ( Feb 2017 ) for the traffic assignments . The method is called the “Difference Method “ in chapter 6 of the NCHRP ( Report 765 ) – National Cooperative Highway Research Program .

5 Local Taxes Requiring Voter Approval
General Tax: The revenues from a General Tax are expended at the discretion of the local government’s governing body on any programs or services. Requires a simple majority (50% +1). Special Tax: The revenue from special tax are dedicated to a specific purpose as defined in the ballot initiative. Requires super-majority (66% +1) “A/B Strategy”: General purpose tax measures accompanied by an advisory measure indicating the recommended use for the funds. Synchro is the correct tool for this level of assessment – a set of VISSIM models would not say anything different although , obviously the values of the MOEs won’t be exactly the same . VISSIM is more appropriate when designing the new interchanges . For the comparison of Synchro & VISSIM done by F & P , see slide 35

6 Voter Approved Tax – Preliminary Quantification
Synchro is the correct tool for this level of assessment – a set of VISSIM models would not say anything different although , obviously the values of the MOEs won’t be exactly the same . VISSIM is more appropriate when designing the new interchanges . For the comparison of Synchro & VISSIM done by F & P , see slide 35

7 Value Capture Tools Description
Funding tools and techniques that extract a portion of private sector benefit resulting from new infrastructure, amenities, or development enabled by the public sector. Potential Grade Separation Benefits Improved access and circulation to nearby property owners New development opportunities (e.g., “air rights”) Reduced sound and visual impacts Synchro is the correct tool for this level of assessment – a set of VISSIM models would not say anything different although , obviously the values of the MOEs won’t be exactly the same . VISSIM is more appropriate when designing the new interchanges . For the comparison of Synchro & VISSIM done by F & P , see slide 35

8 Map of Primary Benefit Area(s)
Churchill Ave. Meadow Dr. Caltrain Corridor: Primary Benefit Area Charleston Rd. Secondary Benefit Areas

9 Value Capture Tools -- Preliminary Quantification
Synchro is the correct tool for this level of assessment – a set of VISSIM models would not say anything different although , obviously the values of the MOEs won’t be exactly the same . VISSIM is more appropriate when designing the new interchanges . For the comparison of Synchro & VISSIM done by F & P , see slide 35

10 Other Local Sources (not quantified)
Local parking fees: Allocate a portion of future parking fees to grade separation Transportation Network Company Fees: Registration fee applied to company shuttle and ride share (e.g., Lyft, Uber) Roadway User Fees: Electronic auto charge on selected access points/lanes (e.g., Alma St.) Utility ROW Fees: Lease modern utility bank/conduit along Caltrain/Alma St. corridor Synchro is the correct tool for this level of assessment – a set of VISSIM models would not say anything different although , obviously the values of the MOEs won’t be exactly the same . VISSIM is more appropriate when designing the new interchanges . For the comparison of Synchro & VISSIM done by F & P , see slide 35

11 Selected Regional, State, or Federal Sources
Synchro is the correct tool for this level of assessment – a set of VISSIM models would not say anything different although , obviously the values of the MOEs won’t be exactly the same . VISSIM is more appropriate when designing the new interchanges . For the comparison of Synchro & VISSIM done by F & P , see slide 35

12 Other State/Federal Sources (not quantified)
State Sources/Programs Caltrain Sales Tax Initiative State Infrastructure Bank (IBank) The Statewide Community Infrastructure Program (SCIP) State Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB 1) Federal Sources/Programs Infrastructure For Rebuilding America Grants Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) grant Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) Loans The Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement Financing (RRIF) program Synchro is the correct tool for this level of assessment – a set of VISSIM models would not say anything different although , obviously the values of the MOEs won’t be exactly the same . VISSIM is more appropriate when designing the new interchanges . For the comparison of Synchro & VISSIM done by F & P , see slide 35

13 Questions/Discussion
For non-coincident peaks (train, traffic & queues), see slides 33 and 34. ( the points raised at outreach # 2 ) The model needs to be representative of peak periods, not individual peaks. 2030 is the important model. Caltrain assumed at-rail services saturation of services. (Without passing or more tracks)


Download ppt "Palo Alto Grade Separation Financing White Paper"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google