Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Professor Diana Kornbrot University of Hertfordshire

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Professor Diana Kornbrot University of Hertfordshire"— Presentation transcript:

1 Professor Diana Kornbrot University of Hertfordshire
'Quality'? Indicators from combining Likert items and other measures from surveys Professor Diana Kornbrot University of Hertfordshire

2 Scene Setting Background Experience
Evaluating Higher Education Benchmarking for HEA, Student Experience Psychological Measurement and Mathematical Modelling Public Indicator Statistics are Composite Components all same type 1-5 Ordinal: agreement or quality(Likert items); Money Components mixed Economic Development: 1-5 Ordinal + Money + Mortality + Literacy Higher Education: 1-5 Ordinal + Money + Failure + Employment Agregation Method from Components Changes Results Important Decisions made on Indicator Ranks 29-Nov-18 Kornbrot, Radical Statistics Meet 24 Feb 2007: Quality of Publice Survey Statistics

3 Getting the Data Higher Education Economic Development
HESA By institution By subject Pay to get by insitution by subject HOLIS Search by Subject Area, University, Gender, Degree Class THES PUSH £14.95 UCAS Economic Development 29-Nov-18 Kornbrot, Radical Statistics Meet 24 Feb 2007: Quality of Publice Survey Statistics

4 Times Higher Education Supplement
League Tables 2006 Entry standards A level points ST 100 Student-to-staff ratio ST 100 Student satisfaction (4min-20max) Likert 13.7 – 16.1 ST 150 Research assessment exercise Pubs 0 -7, bizarre ST 200 Library and computing spending £s 3 year average Facilities spending £s 3 year average Good honours % of graduates ST 100 Completion % entrants Graduate destinations % known ST 100 Salaries 04-05 VC Pay 2004/2005 £104k-£305k Average FT Salary 2004/2005 £21.7k-£43.2k 29-Nov-18 Kornbrot, Radical Statistics Meet 24 Feb 2007: Quality of Publice Survey Statistics

5 National Student Satisfaction
Form For each statement, show extent of agreement or disagreement 5 Definitely agree, 4 Mostly agree, 3 Neither agree nor disagree, 2 Mostly disagree, 1 Definitely disagree, N/A Not applicable The quality from my University for eatch feature was: 5 Excellent, 4 Good, 3 Satisfactory, 2 Weak, 1 Poor, N/A Not applicable Examples 8. I have received detailed comments on my work 19. The course has helped me to present myself with confidence Topics The teaching on my course Q1-4 Assessment and feedback Q5-9 Academic support Q10-12 Organisation and management Q12-15 Learning resources Q16-18 Personal development Q19-22 29-Nov-18 Kornbrot, Radical Statistics Meet 24 Feb 2007: Quality of Publice Survey Statistics

6 Making the League Table
Actual Agregation Procedure Normalize so maximum is 100 Decide on weighting Aggregate Do weightings matter? Desirable? Normalize to z-scores Distinguish input and output measure Exploratory principal components? Univariate multiple regrssion > canoncial input measure? MANOVA? > canoncial input, output measure? Rank Categorize League? Where are big differences 29-Nov-18 Kornbrot, Radical Statistics Meet 24 Feb 2007: Quality of Publice Survey Statistics

7 Principal Components 2 Components 29-Nov-18
Kornbrot, Radical Statistics Meet 24 Feb 2007: Quality of Publice Survey Statistics

8 Principal Components Oblimin Varimax Component correlation .199
Component 1: 41.0 %variance Component 2: 41.0 %variance 29-Nov-18 Kornbrot, Radical Statistics Meet 24 Feb 2007: Quality of Publice Survey Statistics

9 Input and Output 29-Nov-18 Kornbrot, Radical Statistics Meet 24 Feb 2007: Quality of Publice Survey Statistics

10 League Measures Raw ZGood Hons ZNSS Oxford Thames Valley Cambridge
Loughborough Bristol Lampeter Warwick Leicester Nottingham East Anglia Bath Chichester Imperial College Chester Durham York LSE Royal Holloway University CL Bath Spa 29-Nov-18 Kornbrot, Radical Statistics Meet 24 Feb 2007: Quality of Publice Survey Statistics

11 League Measures Agregate
29-Nov-18 Kornbrot, Radical Statistics Meet 24 Feb 2007: Quality of Publice Survey Statistics

12 On Evaluating HE Misleading if not by discipline
Shows ideas League Tables Uninformative Need predictors Weighting Matters? Benchmarking E-Learning Untested target: Embed E-Learning Implications Better tools from public statistics 29-Nov-18 Kornbrot, Radical Statistics Meet 24 Feb 2007: Quality of Publice Survey Statistics

13 On Indicators Generally
Economics Very Similar Can show almost anything Needs sound basis Predictors Weighting? 29-Nov-18 Kornbrot, Radical Statistics Meet 24 Feb 2007: Quality of Publice Survey Statistics

14 Thank You 29-Nov-18 Kornbrot, Radical Statistics Meet 24 Feb 2007: Quality of Publice Survey Statistics

15 Original Abstract Single quality indicators are often derived from weighted sums of survey items, including ordinal Likert items. It is widely believed that the weights and combining procedures don't make much difference to the final rankings or scores. This presentation challenges this assumption using examples from the National Student Survey of UK higher education and country development indices. 29-Nov-18 Kornbrot, Radical Statistics Meet 24 Feb 2007: Quality of Publice Survey Statistics


Download ppt "Professor Diana Kornbrot University of Hertfordshire"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google