Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBrice Pope Modified over 6 years ago
1
Compact Error Resilient Computational DNA Tiling Assemblies
John Reif, Sudheer Sahu, Peng Yin Department of Computer Science, Duke University
2
Self-Assembly of DNA Tiles
2 Self-Assembly of DNA Tiles Perform universal computation. Manufacture patterned nanostructures from smaller unit nanostructures.
3
Assembly of Binary Counter (Winfree)
Computational tiles Seed tile Frame tiles Binary counter
4
Errors in Self-Assembly of DNA Tiles
Binding rules are not strict. A tile might get assembled to a binding site where it was not supposed to go.
5
Example of a Computational Error
Computational tiles Seed tile Error! Frame tiles
6
How to Decrease Errors? Errors can be arbitrarily decreased by
Decreasing concentration of tiles. Increasing binding strengths. Drawback : Reduce speed. Another approach: Change the logical design of the tiles.
7
(Excerpted from Winfree 03)
Error Resilient Tilings by Winfree Original tiles: Error resilient tiles: (Excerpted from Winfree 03) Error rate => 2 Assembly size increased by 4
8
Original tiles: A B C AB BC Error resilient tiles:
9
Original tiles: A B C AB BC Error resilient tiles:
10
Original tiles: A B C AB BC Error resilient tiles: Error checking pads
11
A Computational Tile
12
Compact Error Resilient Construction
Wholeness of pad: Single pad per side.
13
One Mismatch causes more Mismatch
Case 1
14
One Mismatch causes more Mismatch
Case 2
15
One Mismatch causes more Mismatch
Case 3
16
One Mismatch causes more Mismatch
Case 4
17
Result of Compact Error Resilient Scheme
We saw: Two way overlay scheme. One mismatch caused at least one more mismatch. Error is reduced from to 2. Next we will see: Three way overlay scheme. One mismatch will cause at least two more mismatches. Error will reduce from to 3.
18
Compact Error Resilient Tiles (3-way overlay)
Reduce Error from to 3
19
Examples of Error Resilient Assembly
20
Examples of Error Resilient Assembly
21
Computer Simulation (Xgrow, Winfree)
Three way overlay Winfree 3x3 construction Winfree 2x2 construction Two way overlay No error correction
22
Conclusions Assembly size not increased.
Two way overlay: error rate (5%) => 2(0.25%). Three way overlay: error rate (5%) => 3 (0.0125%). Open question: error rate => k ?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.