Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
PA FMP Planning Team Meeting
November 30, 2018 Nov 14, 2013 Footer
2
Outline / Overview Update on Sakâw Yield Curves (Cam/Gyula)
Yield Curves and their link to Dues Structures and Fees (Dave Lindenas) Volume 1 Document Review edits (Cam) November 30, 2018 Footer
3
Yield Curves Summary Based on Timberline’s 2008 work (Natural Stands only) 10 Development Types Unchanged. Yield Groups splits differ: HW stands split on density (B, C/D) HjP stands split on density (B, C/D) jPH stands split on density (B, C/D) HxS stands split on density (B, C/D) xSH stands split on density (B, C/D) bS stands split on site index jP stands split on site index jPbS stands split on site index wSbF stands split on FMZ TL>10% stands split on TL % (11-30% and >30%) All Tamarack volume remains out of the yields. November 30, 2018 Footer
4
Yield Curves Summary Slightly different utilization assumptions employed: Pulp definition changed: SWD compilation dropped the use of tree defects (mistletoe, spiral grain, conk) to ID pulp logs HWD slash definition switched from using tree defects to using C-Zone factors to get net volumes. November 30, 2018 Stump Ht Min DBH Min Top DIB Min Merch Ht Bucking Utilization HWD 30 cm 9 cm 8 cm 5.35 m Tree Length SWD Sawlog SWD Pulp 11 cm 10 cm Footer
5
Yield Curves Summary Stand Decline Assumptions
Terminal Ages shifted slightly (wS now 140) 1% per year decline assumptions retained November 30, 2018 HW WSBF Footer
6
Yield Curves Summary Relative Volumes by DT’s (Initial Estimate Only)
November 30, 2018 Footer
7
Yield Curves Summary Key Differences from 2008 Outcomes
More Hardwood Volume (+24%) Util diff (C zone factors vs tree level defects) Terminal age changes (e.g. HxS went from 95 to 115 yrs) More Softwood Volume (+3%) but less Pulp (20% vs 40%) Older terminal age give more volume overall Lower pulp % due to change in tree level defects indicating pulp November 30, 2018 Footer
8
Due Structures and Fees
November 30, 2018 Footer
9
Volume 1 Document Edits Most edits have been made as per Forest Service Comments Issues: Some requests for clarification of FMP commitments Tables and maps of road construction, upgrades, reclamation since (limited spatial data) Tables and maps of NSR lands on the FMA (no spatial data) Tables of Salvage area by disturbance type (no data on type) Economic profile on the PA FMA – agreed earlier to shift this to reflect the Saskatchewan Forest Sector. November 30, 2018 Footer
10
November 30, 2018 Thanks for your input Footer
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.