Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

By Krishnamurthy et Al. Presented by David Girsault

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "By Krishnamurthy et Al. Presented by David Girsault"— Presentation transcript:

1 By Krishnamurthy et Al. Presented by David Girsault
Integration of QoS-enabled Distributed Object Computing Middleware for Developing Next-Generation Distributed Applications By Krishnamurthy et Al. Presented by David Girsault

2 Introduction Distributed frameworks
Beginning => improve inter-operability Now => demand for better QoS What needs for resource management? Before run-time => already exists During run-time => research

3 Overview of the Adaptive QuO-Middleware
QuO = Quality Objects Allows specifying QoS requirements Control and monitoring information Behavior for dealing with run-time problems RPC  contract + QoS guaranty Middleware in charge of QoS respect

4 Unified Middleware-Centric Qos API
Many != QoS frameworks Standardization necessary Need for an API for QoS Separation between application and protocol Translate QoS parameters to the network Notification system for environment change

5 ACE QoS API Two implementations: Windows, Unix
Extensibility: easy to add network protocols Portability: easy to modify for a platform Event Notification: when QoS change QoS capabilities: resource reservation system

6 Application to the CORBA Audio/Video Streaming Service
QoS parameters: Application class (interactive or not) Media types (audio, video…) Adaptation policies (coeff. of compression) CORBA A/V streaming service: Flexible and portable  CORBA Efficient low-level transport

7 The TAO A/V Streaming Service QoS Framework
QoS Mapping: translation between network-level and application-level QoS Monitoring: application adaptation to resources at run-time QoS-Based transport API: Guarantees required bandwidth

8 Shipboard Dissemination of Unmanned Air Vehicle Video
MPEG data path: UAV Onboard distribution center Video display host

9 Adaptation and Performance Under Load
Adaptation vs Non-adaptation Testing  overloading distribution center A/V Streams vs Ad-Hoc TCP Results: similar performance Time latency irregular with A/V streams

10 Conclusion QoS-enabled middleware: Resource variation at run time
Decreases time and effort for QoS requirements Increases modularity and portability Resource variation at run time System response improvement Better service to end users


Download ppt "By Krishnamurthy et Al. Presented by David Girsault"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google