Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Logical Inferences: A set of premises accompanied by a suggested conclusion regardless of whether or not the conclusion is a logical consequence of the.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Logical Inferences: A set of premises accompanied by a suggested conclusion regardless of whether or not the conclusion is a logical consequence of the."— Presentation transcript:

1 Logical Inferences: A set of premises accompanied by a suggested conclusion regardless of whether or not the conclusion is a logical consequence of the premises. Hence it may be valid inference or faulty inference. Inference is written as (conjunction of premises) → (conclusion) Inference is valid if the implication is tautology otherwise invalid or faulty inference or fallacy Not a Tautology Tautology valid inference invalid inference (faulty)

2 Rules of Inference – valid: There are 4 fundamental rules
Fundamental rule 1: If the statement in P is assumed as True, and the statement P →Q is accepted as true, then we must accept Q as True. (Modus Ponens Rule) Symbolically P P →Q therefore Q Fundamental rule 2: Whenever two implications P →Q and Q →R are accepted as true then we must accept the implication P →R as true (Hypothetical Syllogism or Transitive Rule) Symbolically P →Q Q →R therefore P → R Hypothesis / premises Conclusion Hypothesis / premises Conclusion

3 Fundamental rule 3: DeMorgan’s Law ~( P V Q ) = ~P ^ ~Q ~( P ^ Q ) = ~P V ~Q Fundamental rule 4: Law of Contra positive P → Q = ~ Q → ~ P

4

5

6 Rules of Inference – Invalid
Logical inference is invalid if the implication is not a tautology Also called as faulty inference or fallacy Inference is written as (conjunction of premises) → (conclusion) Tautology Not a Tautology valid inference Invalid inference (faulty)

7 Rule 1 (Fallacy 1)

8 The fallacy of denying the antecedent takes the form P →Q ~P therefore ~Q
Rule 2 (Fallacy 2) Rule 3 (Fallacy 3)

9 Quantified Propositions
Quantifiers: For all ( x) , There exists ( x)

10 Examples: All birds can fly P(x): a bird can fly (proposition)
Quantifier: for all Symbolic Notation: x P(x) 2. Not all birds can fly Q(x): x is a bird a bird can fly (proposition) Some birds can fly but not all Quantifier: there exists Symbolic notation: x Q(x)

11 Examples: 3. If x is a man, then x is a giant P(x): x is a man Q(x): x is giant propositions Quantifier: For some x Symbolic Notation: x P(x) → Q(x) 2. Some men are not giants Symbolic notation: x P(x) → ~Q(x)

12 4 Quantified proposition Rules:

13 Rules of Inference for Quantified Propositions Fundamental Rule 5: (Universal Specification) If a statement of the form x, P(x) is assumed to be true, then the universal quantifier can dropped to obtain P(c) is true for an arbitrary object c in the universe. x, P(x) therefore P(c) for all c Example: all men are mortal proposition: x is mortal then we conclude that Socrates is mortal

14 Rules of Inference for Quantified Propositions Fundamental Rule 6: (Universal Generalization) If a statement P(c) is true for each element ‘c’ of the universe, then the universal quantifier may be prefixed to obtain x, P(x). In symbols P(c) for all c therefore x, P(x) Fundamental Rule 7: (Existence Specification) If x, P(x) is assumed to be true, then there is an element c in the universe such that P(c) is true. In symbolic notation x, P(x) therefore P(c) for some c

15 Rules of Inference for Quantified Propositions Fundamental Rule 8: (Existence Generalization) If P(c) is true for some element c in the universe, then x, P(x), P(x) is true. In symbols P(c) for some c therefore x, P(x)

16 8 Fundamental Rules:

17 Problems: All men are fallible. all kings are men. therefore, all kings are fallible. 2. Lions are dangerous animals There are lions. therefore, there are dangerous animals.


Download ppt "Logical Inferences: A set of premises accompanied by a suggested conclusion regardless of whether or not the conclusion is a logical consequence of the."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google