Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Portfolio Selection with Higher Moments

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Portfolio Selection with Higher Moments"— Presentation transcript:

1 Portfolio Selection with Higher Moments
Inquire UK Autumn Seminar 22-24 September 2002 Royal Bath Hotel, Bournemouth Portfolio Selection with Higher Moments Campbell R. Harvey Duke University, Durham, NC USA National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA USA

2 1. Objectives The asset allocation setting What is risk?
Conditional versus unconditional risk The importance of higher moments Estimation error New research frontiers Campbell R. Harvey

3 2. Modes/Inputs of Asset Allocation
Types of asset allocation Strategic Tactical Type of information Unconditional Conditional Campbell R. Harvey

4 2. Modes/Inputs of Asset Allocation
Constant weights Dynamic weights Slow evolving weights Strategic Tactical Unconditional Conditional Campbell R. Harvey

5 2. Modes/Inputs of Asset Allocation
Conditioning information makes a difference Campbell R. Harvey

6 3. Performance Depends on Business Cycle
Data through June 2002 Campbell R. Harvey

7 3. Performance Depends on Business Cycle
Data through June 2002 Campbell R. Harvey

8 3. Performance Depends on Business Cycle
Data through June 2002 Campbell R. Harvey

9 3. Performance Depends on Business Cycle
Data through June 2002 Campbell R. Harvey

10 4. Conditioning Information and Portfolio Analysis
Adding conditioning information is like adding extra assets to an optimization Campbell R. Harvey

11 4. Conditioning Information and Portfolio Analysis
Er Traditional fixed weight optimization (contrarian) in 2-dimensional setting Vol Campbell R. Harvey

12 4. Conditioning Information and Portfolio Analysis
Er Add conditioning information and weights change through time. Frontier shifts. Vol Campbell R. Harvey

13 5. What is Risk? Traditional models maximize expected returns for some level of volatility Is volatility a complete measure of risk? Campbell R. Harvey

14 5. What is Risk? Much interest in downside risk, asymmetric volatility, semi-variance, extreme value analysis, regime-switching, jump processes, ... Campbell R. Harvey

15 6. Skewness ... These are just terms that describe the skewness in returns distributions. Most asset allocation work operates in two dimensions: mean and variance -- but skew is important for investors. Examples: Campbell R. Harvey

16 6. Skewness 1. The $1 lottery ticket. The expected value is $0.45 (hence a -55%) expected return. Why is price so high? Lottery delivers positive skew, people like positive skew and are willing to pay a premium Campbell R. Harvey

17 6. Skewness 2. High implied vol in out of the money OEX put options.
Why is price so high? Option limits downside (reduces negative skew). Investors are willing to pay a premium for assets that reduce negative skew Campbell R. Harvey

18 6. Skewness 2. High implied vol in out of the money S&P index put options. This example is particularly interesting because the volatility skew is found for the index and for some large capitalization stocks that track the index – not in every option That is, one can diversify a portfolio of individual stocks – but the market index is harder to hedge. Hint of systematic risk Campbell R. Harvey

19 6. Skewness 3. Some stocks that trade with seemingly “too high” P/E multiples Why is price so high? Enormous upside potential (some of which is not well understood) Investors are willing to pay a premium for assets that produce positive skew [Note: Expected returns could be small or negative!] Campbell R. Harvey

20 7. Skewness 3. Some stocks that trade with seemingly “too high” P/E multiples Hence, traditional beta may not be that meaningful. Indeed, the traditional beta may be high and the expected return low if higher moments are important Campbell R. Harvey

21 7. Skewness Campbell R. Harvey

22 7. Skewness Campbell R. Harvey

23 7. Skewness Campbell R. Harvey

24 7. Skewness Campbell R. Harvey

25 7. Skewness Campbell R. Harvey

26 7. Higher Moments & Expected Returns
CAPM with skewness invented in 1973 and 1976 by Rubinstein, Kraus and Litzerberger Same intuition as usual CAPM: what counts is the systematic (undiversifiable) part of skewness (called coskewness) Campbell R. Harvey

27 7. Higher Moments & Expected Returns
Covariance is the contribution of the security to the variance of the well diversified portfolio Coskewness is the contribution of the security to the skewness of the well diversified portfolio Campbell R. Harvey

28 7. Higher Moments & Expected Returns
Data through June 2002 Campbell R. Harvey

29 7. Higher Moments & Expected Returns
Data through June 2002 Campbell R. Harvey

30 7. Higher Moments & Expected Returns
Data through June 2002 Campbell R. Harvey

31 7. Higher Moments & Expected Returns
Data through June 2002 Campbell R. Harvey

32 8. Factors Related to simple CAPM: Rit – rft = ai + bi[Rmt – rft] + eit 1. SR (systematic risk) is the beta, bi in the simple CAPM equation 2. TR (total risk) is the standard deviation of country return si 3. IR (idiosyncratic risk) is the standard deviation of the residual in simple CAPM, eit Campbell R. Harvey

33 8. Factors 4. Log market capitalization Related to size
Campbell R. Harvey

34 8. Factors Related to semi-standard deviation: Semi-B =, for all Rt < B 5. Semi-Mean is the semi-standard deviation with B = average returns for the market 6. Semi-rf is the semi-standard deviation with B = U.S. risk free rate 7. Semi-0 is the semi-standard deviation with B = 0 Campbell R. Harvey

35 8. Factors Related to downside beta 8. Down-biw is the b coefficient from market model using observations when country returns and world returns are simultaneously negative. 9. Down-bw is the b coefficient from market model using observations when world returns negative. Campbell R. Harvey

36 8. Factors Related to value at risk 10. VaR is a value at risk measure. It is the simple average of returns below the 5th percentile level. Campbell R. Harvey

37 8. Factors Related to skewness 11. Skew is the unconditional skewness of returns. It is calculated by taking the Mean(ei3) {Standard deviation of (ei)}^3 12. Skew5%: {(return at the 95th percentile – mean return) -(return at 5th percentile level – mean return)} - 1 Campbell R. Harvey

38 8. Factors 13. Coskew1 is: (S ei * em2)/T
Related to coskewness 13. Coskew1 is: (S ei * em2)/T {square root of (S(ei2 )/T)) } * {(S em2)/T)} 14. Coskew2 is: {standard deviation of (em)}^3 Campbell R. Harvey

39 8. Factors 15. Kurt is the kurtosis of the return distribution
Related to spread 15. Kurt is the kurtosis of the return distribution Campbell R. Harvey

40 8. Factors Related to political risk 16. ICRGC is the log of the average monthly International Country Risk Guide’s (ICRG) country risk composite 17. CCR is the log of the average semi-annual country risk rating published by Institutional Investor. 18. ICRGP is the log of the average monthly ICRG political risk ratings. Campbell R. Harvey

41 8. Factors 19. betahml - HML 20. betasmb - SMB
Related to Fama-French 3-factor model 19. betahml - HML 20. betasmb - SMB Campbell R. Harvey

42 8. Factors 21. betaoil - Oil Price (Change in Brent index)
Related to commodity prices and inflation 21. betaoil - Oil Price (Change in Brent index) 22. binfl - Weighted average of G7 inflation using GDP deflator. Campbell R. Harvey

43 8. Factors Related to FX risk 23. betafx - The trade weighted FX to $ given by the Federal Reserve 24. betafx1- Simple average $ -Euro and $-Yen Campbell R. Harvey

44 8. Factors Related to Interest Rates 25. bintr - Real interest rate - Weighted average short-term interest rate/Weighted average of inflation 26. bterm - Weighted average difference between long and short rates Campbell R. Harvey

45 8. Factors 27. betaip - OECD G7 industrial production
Related to Economic Activity 27. betaip - OECD G7 industrial production Campbell R. Harvey

46 9. Results Campbell R. Harvey

47 9. Results Campbell R. Harvey

48 9. Results Campbell R. Harvey

49 9. Results Harvey and Siddique (2000, Journal of Finance) “Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests” find that skewness is able to explain one of the most puzzling anomalies in asset pricing: momentum Campbell R. Harvey

50 9. Results 12-month momentum Campbell R. Harvey

51 10. Conditional Skewness Bakshi, Harvey and Siddique (2002) examine the fundamental determinants of volatility, covariance, skewness and coskewness Campbell R. Harvey

52 10. Conditional Skewness Campbell R. Harvey

53 10. Conditional Skewness Skewness can be especially important in hedge fund strategies where derivatives play an explicit role in trading strategies Campbell R. Harvey

54 10. Conditional Skewness Source: Lu and Mulvey (2001)
Campbell R. Harvey

55 10. Conditional Skewness Source: Lu and Mulvey (2001)
Campbell R. Harvey

56 11. Three-Dimensional Analysis
Campbell R. Harvey

57 12. Estimation Error Goal is the maximize expected utility (find the point on the frontier that best matches our utility) However, all the moments are estimated with error Traditional analysis does not take this estimation error into account Campbell R. Harvey

58 12. Estimation Error Small movements along the frontier can cause radical swings in weights Campbell R. Harvey

59 12. Estimation Error Popular “solutions” involve the resampling of the efficient frontier Basically, the step are: (1) Calculate the means, variances and covariances (2) Simulate data based on (1) (3) Solve for efficient weights (4) Repeat (2) and (3) many times (5) Average the weights for each asset to get the “resampled” frontier, call it w* Campbell R. Harvey

60 12. Estimation Error However, the average of a set of maximums is not the maximum of an average The expected utility for w* will be less than the maximum expected utility Hence, current techniques are suboptimal Campbell R. Harvey

61 12. Estimation Error Harvey, Liechty, Liechty and Müller (2002) “Portfolio Selection with Higher Moments” provide an alternative approach (1) Generate samples of parameters (means, etc) using a Bayesian estimation procedure (2) Estimate expected utility (3) Find weights that maximize expected utility Campbell R. Harvey

62 12. Estimation Error Harvey, Liechty, Liechty and Müller (2002) “Portfolio Selection with Higher Moments” provide an alternative approach (4) For two moments, use Normal distribution (5) For three moments, use Skew Normal distribution Campbell R. Harvey

63 12. Estimation Error Campbell R. Harvey

64 12. Estimation Error Campbell R. Harvey

65 12. Estimation Error Campbell R. Harvey

66 13. Conclusions Both conditioning information and higher moments matter People make portfolio choices based on “predictive” distributions – not necessarily what has happened in the past Investors have clear preference over skewness which needs to be incorporated into our portfolio selection methods Campbell R. Harvey

67 Readings “Distributional Characteristics of Emerging Market Returns and Asset Allocation," with Geert Bekaert, Claude B. Erb and Tadas E. Viskanta, Journal of Portfolio Management (1998), Winter, “Autoregressive Conditional Skewness,” with Akhtar Siddique, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 34, 4, 1999, “Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests,” with Akhtar Siddique, Journal of Finance 55, June 2000, “Time-Varying Conditional Skewness and the Market Risk Premium,” with Akhtar Siddique, Research in Banking and Finance 2000, 1, “The Drivers of Expected Returns in International Markets,” Emerging Markets Quarterly 2000, “Portfolio Selection with Higher Moments,” with John Liechty, Merrill Liechty, and Peter Müller, Working paper. “Fundamental Risk,” with Gurdip Bakshi and Akhtar Siddique, Working paper. Nan Q. Lu and John M. Mulvey, “Analyses of Market Neutral Hedge Fund Returns” ORFE-01-1, Princeton University Campbell R. Harvey


Download ppt "Portfolio Selection with Higher Moments"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google