Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Finish up APA style Ethics

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Finish up APA style Ethics"— Presentation transcript:

1 Finish up APA style Ethics
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology

2 Announcements Quiz 4: Due Fri. Sept. 14 (by midnight)
Exam 1: on Monday Mixture of multiple choice and short answer University college writing help: Online CITI ethics training due week 5 Announcements

3 APA style: Parts of a research report
The basic parts of a research article: Abstract Body Introduction Methods Participants Materials/Apparatus Design Procedure Results Discussion References The rest Authors Notes, Footnotes, Tables, Figures & Captions APA style: Parts of a research report

4 Results (state the results, but do not interpret them here)
Results (state the results, but do not interpret them here) (video | video) Verbal statement of results Tables and figures These get referred to in the text, but actually get put into their own sections at the end of the manuscript Statistical Outcomes Means, standard deviations, t-tests, ANOVAs, correlations, etc. Body

5 Body Results (state the results, but do not interpret them here)
Reading checklist 1) Did the author get unexpected results? 2 a) How does the author interpret the results? b) How would YOU interpret the results? c) What implications would YOU draw from these results? Writing checklist Is it clear how the hypotheses are tested by the analyses? Would a graph or table help clarify the results? What questions might the reader still have, and how could I answer them in this section? Body

6 Body Discussion (interpret the results)
Relationship between purpose and results Theoretical (or methodological) contribution Implications Future directions (optional) Reading checklist 1 a) Does YOUR interpretation or the authors' interpretation best represent the data? b) Do you or the author draw the most sensible implications and conclusions? Writing checklist Have you stated your most convincing argument? Do the conclusions follow straightforwardly from the results? Body

7 The rest When something odd comes up, don’t guess. Look it up!
References (video | video) Author’s name Year Title of work Publication information Journal Issue Pages Footnotes Tables Figures Adolescent Depression 29 References Barnett, P. A., & Gotlib, I. H. (1988). Psychosocial functioning and depression: Distinguishing among antecedents, concomitants, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 104, Beck, A. T. (1978). Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Benoit, D., Vidovic, D., & Roman, J. (1991, April). Transmission of attachment across three generations. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston. Benoit, D., Zeanah, C. H., & Barton, M. L. (1989). Maternal attachment disturbances in failure to thrive. Infant Mental Health Journal, 3, Benoit, D., Zeanah, C. H., Boucher, C., & Minde, K. (1989). Sleep disorders in early childhood: Association with insecure maternal attachment. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, When something odd comes up, don’t guess. Look it up! The rest

8 Figures and tables These are used to supplement the text.
To make a point clearer for the reader. Typically used for: The design Examples of stimuli Patterns of results Figures and tables

9 Checklist - things to watch for
Clarity Logic of the argument is clear How are pieces related, clear transitions between paragraphs Acknowledge the work of others (avoid plagiarism) Appropriate use of headings Correct citing and references Good grammar Active (preferred) vs. Passive voice (avoid) Active: Summers and Jordan (2009) hypothesized that speakers use to much passive voice Passive: It was hypothesized by Summers and Jordan (2009) that speakers use to much passive voice Avoid biased language Checklist - things to watch for APA style checklist (class rubric) APA Journal Article Reporting Standards (see table 1)

10 Ethics – people should be treated as ends not means

11 Ethical Responsibilities in Research
Two basic categories of ethical concerns: Need to consider the rights of our participants in our research Need to behave ethically as scientists and practitioners Ethical Responsibilities in Research Ethics in Psychological Research (~8 mins) Ethics in Psychological Research (~7 mins) Ethics in Psychological Research (~10 mins)

12 Ethical Responsibilities in Research
Two basic categories of ethical concerns: Need to consider the rights of our participants in our research Need to behave ethically as scientists and practitioners Ethical Responsibilities in Research

13 Using humans in research
For the most part the researcher has the power You know what is going to be done to the participants Participants may feel like they have to do it Consider the Milgram (1963) study | video Demonstrated how far people may go to obey authorities This study itself exemplifies the need for strict rules of ethics Using humans in research See also the Stanford Prison Experiment : video

14 Ethical Responsibilities in Research
Consider ethics at each step Does the topic/idea for the research have some ethical issues surrounding it? How are participants selected? What methods may be used on the participant population? What measurement techniques will be used? What design is appropriate? How are the data analyzed? How are the results reported? Ethical Responsibilities in Research

15 APA’s code of ethics

16 APA’s code of ethics 5 General Principles (& many ethical standards)
Beneficence & Non-maleficence Protection from harm, Cost/Benefits analysis, Confidentiality Fidelity & Responsibility Uphold professional and scientific standards of contact Integrity Honesty and accuracy in science Justice Freedom from coercion, equal access to benefits Respect for people’s rights and dignity Basic courtesy, Informed consent, Debriefing, Avoid deception APA’s code of ethics

17 Information to allow a person to decide if they want to participate (sample in lab manual pgs 26-27)
Basic purpose of the study Participation is voluntary Risks involved Benefits involved Rights to refuse or terminate participation Assent - guardians if participants are not competent e.g., children, developmentally disabled people Informed consent

18 Using deception in research
Types Passive deception Withholding information about the study Active deception Deliberately misleading participants Avoid it when possible Consider alternatives to deception Role-playing When not possible to avoid Make sure that you are up front with all possible risks Potential results must be worth it Must debrief participants as soon as possible (either right after participation or as soon as project is over) Using deception in research

19 Costs/Benefits analysis
Costs: all potential risks to the participants Physical harm Psychological harm Loss of confidentiality Benefits: the “good” outcomes Direct benefits to participants Benefits to knowledge base Benefits to world at large Costs/Benefits analysis

20 Monitoring of ethics Institutional Review Board IRB Criteria
Minimize risk Benefits > Risks Equal opportunity sampling Informed consent Documentation of consent Data monitoring Privacy & Confidentiality Monitoring of ethics

21 Ethical Responsibilities in Research
Two basic categories of ethical concerns: Need to consider the rights of our participants in our research Need to behave ethically as scientists and practitioners For Fun: Watch and count how many violations you see Ethical Responsibilities in Research

22 Ethical Responsibilities in Research
Two basic categories of ethical concerns: Need to consider the rights of our participants in our research Need to behave ethically as scientists and practitioners Ethical Responsibilities in Research

23 Scientific Integrity Two basic categories of ethical concerns:
Need to consider the rights of our participants in our research Need to behave ethically as scientists and practitioners (Integrity, Fidelity & Responsibility) Fraud prevention Replication – repeat a research study to validate results Peer Review – critical analysis of research by peers in the same area Plagiarism – taking credit for another’s work or ideas Avoided by citing the ideas or words of others Scientific Integrity

24 Ethical responsibility to science
Dirty tricks (this will get you thrown out) Questionable tricks (these are a little fuzzier, but be wary) Neat tricks (accepted as okay, and sometimes necessary) Ethics in Science Quiz Ethical responsibility to science

25 Ethical responsibility to science
Dirty tricks Questionable tricks Neat tricks Ethics in Science Quiz DT Fabrication of results Little or no attempt to minimize demand biases Reformulating your theory as you go Falsifying credentials Plagiarism Little or no attempt to minimize confounds Deliberately hiding (significant) errors in published work Little or no attempt to minimize demand characteristics QT NT DT DT QT DT QT Ethical responsibility to science

26 Ethical responsibility to science
Dirty tricks Questionable tricks Neat tricks Ethics in Science Quiz QT or DT Throwing out data Reorganizing order of report of experiments Violations of underlying statistical assumptions Strategic graphing of the data Duplicate publications (presented as new) Selective reporting of the results Leaving out some bad experiments (not bad results) depends reason for throwing out NT QT QT DT QT NT Ethical responsibility to science

27 Exam 1 Exam 1: 10% of final grade Short answer & multiple choice
Covers – lectures, textbook, lab material Textbook Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 Exam 1


Download ppt "Finish up APA style Ethics"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google