Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 5  Spring 2005

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 5  Spring 2005"— Presentation transcript:

1 ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 5  Spring 2005
Paste a photo of team members with completed project here. Annotate this photo with names of team members.

2 Outline Project overview Block diagram Professional components
Design components Success criteria demonstrations Individual contributions Project summary Questions / discussion

3 Project Overview “The Pill Pusher” Home Appliance
Device will dispense a preprogrammed number of pills based on a time schedule. Pill information and delivery times are programmed to device via a serial connection to a PC. Buzzer sounds upon dispensing pills. Alert will cease when a button is pressed. Home Appliance Fits on your countertop and takes up as much space as a coffee maker Simple to use for the elderly

4 Block Diagram-Original
Serial interface Microcontroller Dispenser LCD Display PC Modem Audio System Scroll Buttons

5 Block Diagram-Revised

6 Professional Components
Constraint analysis and component selection rationale Patent liability analysis Reliability and safety analysis Ethical and environmental impact analysis

7 Constraint Analysis Computational Requirements-Microcontroller
Store information about pills in banks Keep track of time Activate delivery system and alert the user Interface Requirements LCD display Store information using serial connection to PC Power Supply Constraints Power supply is 5 V DC Maximum current is 5.1 mA

8 Constraint Analysis Packaging Constraints Cost Constraints
Contains 4 pill banks, LCD display and PCB Portability is not a concern Cost Constraints A device that is cheaper than similar products Component Selection Microcontroller (PIC18F4539) Stepper Motors vs. Servo Motors

9 Patent Liability Analysis
Main Focus How would the pills be dispensed? What happens if the pills are an oblong shape? Patent One “Programmable automatic pill dispenser” Preload the necessary pills for that day in a compartment The whole canister is dispensed Patent Two “Remotely programmable medication dispensing system” Most similar to ours Pre-package pills for that day in bags Uses a barcode to identify when pills should be dropped

10 Patent Liability Analysis
Literal Infringement “The Pill Pusher” vs. Patent Two No infringement found based on the way pills are dispensed Infringement Under Doctrine of Equivalents “The Pill Pusher” vs. Patent One No infringement-very different

11 Reliability/Safety Analysis

12 Ethical/Environmental Analysis

13 Design Components Packaging design considerations
Schematic design considerations PCB layout design considerations Software design considerations

14 Packaging Design Package is constructed using acrylic
Can withstand high pressure Machine shop has equipment to cut/bend Internal operation can be observed Box-like design with slanted face for LCD screen and controls Lockable top lid allows access to magazines

15 Packaging Design 2D schematic

16 Packaging Design Lid Enclosure

17 Packaging Design 3D schematic

18 Packaging Design Pill Banks
Strips of acrylic sheets, glued together to form banks. Universal mounting base plate. Actuator pushes pills out front of bank.

19 Schematic Design

20 Schematic/Theory of Operation
Power Block

21 Schematic/Theory of Operation
Microcontroller

22 Schematic/Theory of Operation
Motor Control

23 Schematic/Theory of Operation
Switch Input

24 PCB Layout Design

25 Software Design

26 Success Criteria Demonstrations
To send/receive prescription information and times to/from a PC via serial interface- demo To control dispensing system with microcontroller generated interrupts- demo To display pertinent information for status/user control on LCD screen - demo To provide audible signal to user for specific events - demo To store prescription data in memory and access it based on a time schedule.- demo

27 Individual Contributions
Team Leader – Jonathan Benetti Team Member 2 – Andy Mehl Team Member 3 – Adam McNeal Team Member 4 – Ben Romberger

28 Team Leader – Jonathan Benetti

29 Member 2 – Andy Mehl

30 Member 3 – Adam McNeal

31 Member 4 – Ben Romberger

32 Project Summary Important lessons learned

33 Project Summary Second iteration enhancements

34 Questions / Discussion


Download ppt "ECE 477 Final Presentation Group 5  Spring 2005"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google