1. Val Swift, Hamilton County Surveyors Office

3. VOTER REGISTRATION & PRECINCT MAPPING: WHAT DO WE HAVE TO DO? MAINTAIN DATABASE OF REGISTERED VOTERS (THE STATE MAINTAINS THE DATABASE) MAINTAIN VOTING PRECINCTS WITHIN SIZE LIMITS – BY NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS, NOT POPULATION (THE COUNTY BREAKS DOWN THE NUMBERS TO REDISTRICT WHERE NECESSARY)

4. RULES? CONSIDERATIONS? CHALLENGES (PROBLEMS)? FOLLOW CENSUS BLOCK LINES CORPORATE BOUNDARIES CITY…. OR TOWN HOLY ANNEXATIONS LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES CITY/TOWN COUNCIL DISTRICTS

5. TOWN RULES

6. CITY RULES

7. HOLY SWISS CHEESE!

8. TECHNICOLOR ZIP CODES

9. Fishers: 5 zips

10. WHAT (DATA) WE HAD VOTER DATA WHAT (DATA) WE DID NOT HAVE ADDRESS POINTS WITH WHICH TO MATCH THE VOTERS

11. SO… WHAT WE REALLY NEEDED WAS SOME MORE…

12. NICE SHINY DATA

13. RELIABLE ADDRESS POINTS… LOTS OF THEM.

14. DIAL 911? WELL…YES. THE COUNTYS 911 PROJECT INCLUDED ADDRESS POINTS FOR APARTMENTS WHICH WAS THE DATA THAT THE PARCEL INFORMATION COULDNT PROVIDE

15. GEOCODING RESULTS MATCHES: 153,417 94.9% TIES: 4934 3.1% UNMATCHED: 3229 2.0% TOTAL: 161,580 100%

16. REALLY GOOD MATCHING

17. GREAT MATCHING

18. WEST…EAST…OOPS

19. DATA ENTRY ERRORS

20. ADDRESS SORTING ISSUES

21. 911 ADDRESS TABLE: CHERRY HILL FARMS

22. VOTER REGISTRATION TABLE

23. 911 ADDRESS TABLE

24. ANALYSIS: ITLL WORK… ITS (THE PROJECT) ALIVE!! THE NUMBERS DIDNT COME OUT EVEN ADDRESS ERRORS IN VOTER DATABASE WHICH IS THE CORRECT ADDRESS WHERE ARE SOME OF THE CONFLICTS ORIGINATING

25. REAL LIFE APPLICATIONS REDISTRICTING (COUNTY POPULATION INCREASES MORE THAN 10,00/YR) ANNEXATIONS (AVERAGE 55 PER YEAR SINCE THE 2000 CENSUS)

26. ANNEXATIONS 2001: 32 2002: 45 2003: 92 2004: 58 2005: 52 2006: 52 2007: 8 (THROUGH FEB)

27. ANNEXATIONS

28. KEY TASK: IDENTIFYING VOTERS IN NEWLY ANNEXED AREAS CITY/TOWN COUNCIL DISTRICT FOR REDISTRICTING

29. SOLUTIONS REFINE THE GEOCODING PROCESS ESTABLISH WORKFLOWS DETERMINE WHAT REPORTS ARE NEEDED TRAINING