Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Urban Wildlife Damage Control

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Urban Wildlife Damage Control"— Presentation transcript:

1 Urban Wildlife Damage Control
Robert Bourne Bryan County Extension Educator

2 Wildlife Damage 101 Damage Types Human health and safety
Property - $22 billion annual U.S. Environmental degradation Nuisance Damage Management Separate – exclusion, repellents, fear Modify – habitat modification, diversion Remove – lethal control, translocation Turn lemons into lemonade when possible!

3 White-tailed Deer

4 White-tailed Deer Damage Tree/shrub/landscaping damage
Vehicle collisions Tick-borne disease Nuisance dogs Control Exclusion – effective for small high value areas (electric) Habitat modification – use of unpalatable plants Frightening – only temporarily effective (Exception – dogs) Repellents – somewhat effective on small scale

5 “Peanut Butter Fence”

6 Canada Geese Damage Landscape damage Goose fecal matter
Aggressive behavior Control Exclusion –effective at small scales Cultural – unkempt lawn, unpalatable plants Frightening – only effective for short time Exception – dogs Repellents/Toxicants – none

7 Special Considerations – Canada Goose
Migratory Bird Treaty Resident vs. Migrant Geese ODWC – Resident goose control (within cities) through the Nuisance Wildlife Control Officers Hunting is effective.

8 Woodpecker Tree Damage – typically in winter from sapsuckers
Home Damage Spring (territorial drumming) Feeding Frightening ineffective No repellants Exclusion: eaves or trees Habitat Modification Suet Drumming board Species of tree Home construction

9 Armadillo

10 Armadillo Digging for burrows and food (grubs and insects)
Primarily a summer problem, aesthetics Repellants do not work Soil insecticides bad idea Exclusion works well for small areas Trapping is very effective Reduce irrigation

11

12 Armadillo Trap

13 Gopher Create mounds that are fan-shaped Consume plant matter
Exclusion can work on small areas (underground barrier) Toxicants can be used underground Trapping preferred in tunnels (2 traps)

14 Moles Create tunnels Consume insects (grubs)
Not damaging, beneficial animal No control necessary

15 Tree Squirrels Damage Exclusion works well Frightening not effective
Consume bird feed and pecans Enter attics Exclusion works well Close off attic Tree/pole guards Frightening not effective

16 Squirrels at Feeders Place feeder away from trees (> 6’)
Use squirrel guards (>4’)

17 House Sparrow/Starling
Both exotic, not protected Damage Consume bird seed Nest in bird boxes Exclusion for some situations Trapping can be effective Habitat modification preferred Eliminate food source Eliminate cavities Modify bird boxes

18 Bird Netting

19 Rabbit

20 Rabbit Damage Tree/shrub/landscaping damage Control
Exclusion – effective for small high value areas (fencing) Habitat modification – use of unpalatable plants Frightening – not very effective Repellents – somewhat effective on small scale Trapping – live catch traps very effective

21 Muskrat Beaver

22 Muskrat and Beaver Damage Control
Tree damage Compromise levees Control Exclusion – effective for trees at small scales, concrete spillways Frightening – no Repellents/Toxicants – none Shooting and Trapping – effective if done properly

23 Special Considerations for Beaver
They are VERY intelligent! Trap shy Killing traps not legal in OK Contact USDA Wildlife Services for trapping

24 Resources Internet Center for Wildlife Damage Management: NWCO: USDA Wildlife Services: USDAWS


Download ppt "Urban Wildlife Damage Control"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google