Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWilla Moody Modified over 6 years ago
1
Observed and Simulated Decadal Variability in Clouds and Water Vapour Richard Allan, Tony Slingo Environmental Systems Science Centre, University of Reading Mark Ringer Hadley Centre, Met Office
2
INTRODUCTION Climate Sensitivity and Feedback
How does cloud and water vapour respond to changes in surface temperature? How well are interannual variations in cloud and water vapour simulated by a climate model? HadAM3 Simulations ( ) Explicitly calculate “UTH” radiances Satellite-like clear-sky diagnostics Evaluation of HadAM3 using satellite data
3
EXPERIMENTS [Allan et al. 2003, accepted QJ]
Ensemble of AMIP-type HadAM3 runs Standard res, 19 levels, HadISST SST/sea ice forcing Radiance code [see Ringer et al., 2002, QJ, 129, ] Modified clear-sky diagnostics: OLRc & water vapour radiance Additional “all-forcings” run SATELLITE DATA - column water vapour, CWV [SMMR , SSM/I ] - clear-sky OLR [ERBS , ScaRaB 1994/5, CERES 1998] - Water Vapour channel brightness temperature, T6.7 [HIRS ]
4
Interannual variability of Column Water vapour
See also Soden (2000) J.Clim 13
5
Can we use reanalysis CWV?
ERA-40
6
Upper tropospheric moisture
Clear-sky OLR sensitive to Ts and RH 6.7 mm cloud cleared radiance sensitive to upper tropospheric Relative Humidity Explicitly simulate 6.7 mm radiance Modified “satellite-like” clear-sky diagnostics
7
Model-obs differences & Clear-sky Sampling
Type II HadAM3-OBS Type-I DT 6.7 DOLRc
8
EOF analysis of spatio-temporal variability in water vapour radiance
9
Interannual monthly anomalies: tropical oceans
ga=1-(OLRc/sTs4)
10
(+additional forcings)
11
Clear-sky sampling: interannual variability
Light blue: Type I (weighted by clear-sky fraction) Dark Blue: Type II (unweighted mean)
12
Large changes in OLR from 7 independent satellite instruments (Wielicki et al, 2002)
13
Allan & Slingo 2002, GRL, 29(7) OLR Clear-sky OLR RSW
14
EITHER: (1) satellite data wrong: cannot measure decadal changes in tropical radiation budget (and hence cloudiness variations) using most well-calibrated, stable radiometers OR: (2) Our understanding of what determines decadal changes in clouds and radiation is overly simplistic REGARDLESS: measurements of tropical radiation budget provide vital information on tropical cloudiness changes
15
Summary Climate model simulates low-level water vapour changes
Clear-sky sampling important for infrared channel climatologies but not interannual variability Simulations of satellite brightness temperatures: Consistent decadal variability suggests small DRH realistic Climate models cannot capture the large decadal changes in the tropical radiation budget ( ) More wide-field of view instruments (simple yet well-calibrated & stable) Note of caution: can multiple satellite intercalibration artificially remove decadal trends in the UTH radiances? Changes in atmospheric T also influences T6.7 decadal fluctuations
16
Climatological mean over 60oS-60oN oceans
17
Info on upper tropospheric water vapour
500mb omega Clear-sky OLR
18
Water vapour feedback: recent advances
(1) Insensitive to resolution (Ingram 2002, J Climate, 15, ) (2) Consistent with observations following post-Pinatubo cooling (Soden et al 2002, Science, 296, 727)
19
Is water vapour feedback really consistent between models?
dOLRc/dTs ~ 2 Wm-2K-1 dOLR/dTs uncertain (Cess et al. 1990, JGR, 95, 16601) Allan et al. 2002, JGR, 107(D17), doi: /2001JD - Temperature lapse rate (Gaffen et al 2000, Science, 287, 1242) - Tropical Cloudiness (Wielicki et al, 2002, Science, 295, 841)
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.