1. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible 
Hironari Hayama, Kenji Fueki, Juro Wadachi, Noriyuki Wakabayashi 
Journal of Prosthodontic Research 
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (July 2018)
DOI: /j.jpor
Copyright © 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1 Scanning operation.
Journal of Prosthodontic Research  , DOI: ( /j.jpor )
Copyright © 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Box plot demonstrating accuracy measurements reflecting trueness.
Journal of Prosthodontic Research  , DOI: ( /j.jpor )
Copyright © 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Color-coded deviation maps showing superposition of the scan data and the reference data after applying the best-fit method and making a 3D comparison with Geomagic studio software, for evaluation of trueness.
Journal of Prosthodontic Research  , DOI: ( /j.jpor )
Copyright © 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 4
Box plot demonstrating accuracy measurement reflecting precision.
Journal of Prosthodontic Research  , DOI: ( /j.jpor )
Copyright © 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions

6. Fig. 5
Color-coded deviation maps within each test group (two optional deviations in each of the reference data, conventional data, and digital impression data), after applying the best-fit method and making a 3D comparison by Geomagic studio software for evaluation of precision.
Journal of Prosthodontic Research  , DOI: ( /j.jpor )
Copyright © 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions

7. Fig. 6
Number of scans required to obtain digital impressions using an intraoral scanner with a large or a small scanning head.
Journal of Prosthodontic Research  , DOI: ( /j.jpor )
Copyright © 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions