Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Data Interpretation of Baryon Resonances
A. Švarc Rudjer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
2
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
3
Poles as resonance signal CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Main task Poles as resonance signal Experiment CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
4
Poles as resonance signal CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Main task Poles as resonance signal PWA Experiment SE PWA MODEL MODEL CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
5
Poles as resonance signal CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Main task Poles as resonance signal PWA Experiment SE PWA MODEL MODEL Phase ambiguity Laurent + Pietarinen From Experimental Data to Pole Parameters in a Model Independent Way CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
6
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Continuum ambiguity All observables in single-channel processes are described as bilinears of invariant amplitudes! 𝑶 ≡ 𝒇( 𝑨 𝒊 ∙𝑩 𝒋 ∗ ) CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
7
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Example: η photoproduction CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
8
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Therefore, the simultaneous transformation 1-fold rotation does not change anything! A consequence: ALL SC OBSERVABLES ARE INVARIANT WITH RESPECT TO ENERGY AND ANGLE DEPENDENT PHASE ROTATION where Φ(W,θ) is an arbitrary energy and ANGLE dependent real function! This is called CONTINUUM AMBIGUITY! CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
9
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Energy dependent phase rotation has been discussed very often when two different models are compared! It is usually done on the level of partial waves: We choose one multipole Match the phase of that multipole Multiply all other multipoles with that phase Angle dependent phase rotation has hardly been ever discussed! CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
10
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Let us see what is the influence of angle dependent continuum ambiguity upon a partial wave decomposition! Example For η photoproduction partial wave decomposition is defined as Let us simplify things somewhat! CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
11
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Legendre polynomials satisfy recursive relations All derivatives of Legendre polynomials can be reduced to lower index Legendre polynomials. So, in practice we deal with the general problem CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
12
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
So, our problem is: CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
13
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
14
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
is a long time ago given in However, Yannick Wunderlich has in his thesis Derived a very nice closed formula: Angle dependent phase rotations mix multipoles CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
15
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Explicitly: CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
16
Importance of angle dependent phase rotations in PWA
Influence upon unconstrained SE PWA CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
17
Fitted invariant amplitudes CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
General testing scheme of a procedure by using numeric or pseudo data Theoretical multipoles Invariant amplitudes Observables (complete set) SE PWA I D E N T I C A L Fitted invariant amplitudes Fitted multipoles Fitted observables CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
18
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
We perform SINGLE ENERGY UNCONSTRAINED LMAX = 8 truncated PWA of η photoproduction pseudo-data CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
19
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
dσ/dΩ Data F P Oz’ T Σ Cx’ CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
20
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Two different initial values two different solutions with the same χ2 Sol 1: MAID16a Sol 2: Bon-Gatchina CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
21
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
22
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
PROBLEM ! Complex analysis Sol 1 and Sol 2 must be identical to the generating model as we fitted a complete set …. Continuum ambiguity Sol 1 and Sol 2 must be identical up to a phase Conclusion There must exist a phase which connects Sol 1 and Sol 2. And the phase MUST be defined at the level of AMPLITUDES and NOT partial waves CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
23
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Let me illustrate the problem CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
24
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Let me illustrate the problem CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
25
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
generating model CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
26
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
27
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Let me solve the problem CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
28
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
29
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
30
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
PWA9/ATHOS Bad Honnef 2017 30 CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
31
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
This means that all three SE solutions: Generating solution MAID15a Sol 1 Sol 2 can be transformed into each other by an angle dependent phase rotation! SO THEY ARE EQUIVALENT! MAID15a Sol 1 Sol 2 Question: Can we use it to stabilize unconstrained SE PWA? CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
32
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Let us introduce the following angle dependent phase rotation Sol 1: 𝑯 𝒌 𝑺𝑬𝟏𝟔𝒂 (W, 𝒙)= 𝑯 𝒌 𝑺𝑬𝟏𝟔𝒂 𝒆 𝒊 𝚽 𝑯 𝟐 𝟏𝟓𝒂 𝑾,𝒙 −𝒊 𝚽 𝑯 𝟐 𝑺𝑬𝟏𝟔𝒂 𝑾,𝒙 Sol 2: 𝑯 𝒌 𝑺𝑬𝑩𝒐𝑮𝒂 (W, 𝒙)= 𝑯 𝒌 𝑺𝑬𝑩𝒐𝑮𝒂 𝒆 𝒊 𝚽 𝑯 𝟐 𝟏𝟓𝒂 𝑾,𝒙 −𝒊 𝚽 𝑯 𝟐 𝑺𝑬𝑩𝒐𝑮𝒂 𝑾,𝒙 Both rotated SE solutions now have the same H2 phase; phase of generating 15a model CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
33
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Problem solved CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
34
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
VERY IMPORTANT! we obtain the „anchor” point CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
35
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
36
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
37
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
L+P method is tested and well documented Conformal-mapping generated fast converging expansion of regular part of Laurent decomposition around physical branchpoints in the limited part of 2-nd Riemann sheet of complex energy plane near real axes CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
38
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
References: CLAS CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
39
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
CLAS seminar at JLab Friday, August 18th, at 11.00 CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
40
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
SUMMARY CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
41
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Future prospects We need hard work… We have the tool CLAS Collaboration Meeting June 2017
42
CLAS Collaboration Meeting 13-16 June 2017
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.