Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byStanley Owen Modified over 6 years ago
1
Detection of Atrial Fibrillation After Surgical Ablation: Conventional Versus Continuous Monitoring
Ralph J. Damiano, MD, Christopher P. Lawrance, MD, Lindsey L. Saint, MD, Matthew C. Henn, MD, Laurie A. Sinn, RN, BSN, Jane Kruse, RN, BSN, Marye J. Gleva, MD, Hersh S. Maniar, MD, Patrick M. McCarthy, MD, Richard Lee, MD, MBA The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016) DOI: /j.athoracsur Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions
2
Fig 1 Reveal XT implantable loop recording device.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , 42-48DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions
3
Fig 2 Follow-up compliance by arrhythmia monitoring device. (ECG = electrocardiography; ILR = implantable loop recorder.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , 42-48DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions
4
Fig 3 Freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) as determined by capture method. (ATAs = atrial tachyarrhythmias; ECG = electrocardiography; ILR = implantable loop recorder.) The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , 42-48DOI: ( /j.athoracsur ) Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.