1. Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting – KARNATAKA on 26.02.2009
Ministry of HRD
Government of India
MDM-PAB Meeting – KARNATAKA on

2. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Part-I
Review of Implementation of MDMS in Karnataka (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Questions?
What is the level of unspent balances as on ?
How regular the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains?
What is the level of lifting?
How about cooking cost? Was disbursed to Districts? What is the level of utilisation at school level?
How synchronous utilisation of food grains and cooking cost?
How utilisation of foodgrains reconcile with number of meal served?
…… contd
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

4. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Contd ….., Questions?
How much MME was utilized? Under what activities?
What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices?
Part –II
What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2007 to 2008?
How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data?
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

5. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Benchmarks
Desirable stock in hand : 15% (+ or - 5%)
Lifting of foodgrains [ to ]: 85% (+ or - 10%)
Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [ to ]: 75% (+ or – 10%)
Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is lifted & distributed.
Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost is synchronous.
State’s AWP&B is in accordance with M/HRD’s guidelines.
Data in the AWP&B is authentic, reliable & based on the records.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise cumulative)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
*: Including unspent balance as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

7. Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise cumulative)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
*: Including unspent balance of MTs as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

8. Level of Unspent Balance of foodgrains
As on
(% of annual allocation)
No. of Districts 0%
Less than 5%
5%-10%
11%-20%
Above 20%
Total 3 12 8 5 1 29
As on
(% of annual allocation)
No. of Districts
(-) ve 0%
Less than 5%
5%-10%
11%-20%
Above 20%
Total 2 1 4 7 12 3 29

9. Huge/Negative Unspent Balance of foodgrains
As on
(Foodgrains in MTs)
Sl. No.
Districts
USB as on
Annual Requirement
USB as % of Annual Requirement 1
Raichur
39%
As on
(Foodgrains in MTs)
Sl. No.
Districts
USB as on
Annual Requirement
USB as % of Annual Requirement 1
Chikkaballapur
-33% 2
Ramnagar
-13%

10. Analysis: Foodgrains Availability (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Benchmark : 85%
Foodgrains (in MTs)
100%
78%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

11. Foodgrains lifting (Availability) – Dist. wise
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

12. Foodgrains Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Benchmark : 70%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

13. Foodgrains Utilisation – Dist-wise
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

14. Cooking Cost Disbursed and Utilisation (1.4.2008 to 31.12.2008)
Benchmark
Disbursed: 85%
Utilisation: 70%
Cooking Cost (in % Disbursed and utilisation.)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

15. Cooking Cost Utilisation – Dist. wise
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

16. Mismatch in Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost (District-wise)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

17. Reconciliation : No. of meals Vs Qty of foodgrains
Sl. No
District
No. of Meals served
Expected consumption of food grains (MTs)
Actual Consumption of food grains (MTs)
Diff in %
Deficit Consumption 1
Chikkaballapur
1.89 Cr.
- 54% 2
Ramnagar
1.71 Cr.
882.01 3
Haveri
2.99 Cr.
- 32% 4
Mangalore-DK
3.39 Cr.
- 24% 5
Dharward
2.94 Cr.
- 23%
Excess Consumption 6
Kolar
2.46 Cr.
+ 18% 7
Bangalore-R
1.41 Cr.
+ 35%

18. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
MME Utilisation ( to )
Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

19. Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs)
69%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

20. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Sheds)
Progress (in %)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

21. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Devices)
Progress (in %)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

22. Performance Score card – A Summary
Sl. No.
Component
Achievement
Benchmark 1.
Foodgrains Lifting
78%
85% 2.
Foodgrains Utilisation
67%
70% 3.
Cooking Cost Utilisation
73% 4.
MME Utilisation
75% 5.
Kitchen Shed construction
31%
100% 6.
Kitchen Devices procurement 7.
QPRs
2 nos.
4 nos.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

23. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2009-10
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

24. Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
(down by 2%)
(down by 12%)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

25. Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB) Vs MDM
No. of children (in lakhs)
(3% less)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

26. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
(22% less)
(23% less)
(31% less)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

27. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2008-09 (UPPER PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

28. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Thank You
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India