Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Menu Analysis & Engineering
HRT383
2
References Mill, Robert Christie (1998) Restaurant Management: Customers, operations, and employees / Menu Scoring & Menu Engineering, pp Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall. Drysdale, John A. & Jennifer Adams Aldrich (2002). Profitable menu planning / Chapter 5: Menu Analysis, pp rd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall, TX911.3.M45 D CD-ROM TX911.3.M45 D 12/2/2018 HRT383
3
Objectives By the completion of this presentation you should be able to: Analyze a menu for profitability Apply menu engineering to menu analysis Price menu items Locate menu items on a menu. 12/2/2018 HRT383
4
Important Terms Menu engineering Menu Plowhorses Puzzles Stars Dogs
Placement Pricing 12/2/2018 HRT383
5
Introduction This presentation explains how to evaluate a menu
When measuring a menu to see if it is successful 2 criteria must be met to declare it a winner: Must be profitable in terms of individual item profitability Most profitable item must be selling the best. For evaluating menus, several systems are available. Two of the most widely used methods will be presented here. 12/2/2018 HRT383
6
Stars, Plowhorses, Puzzles, & Dogs
Method, called menu engineering, developed by Donald Smith Ph.D., Westin Hotels Distinguished Professor at Washington State University This method rates the menu by measuring each entrée as to its profitability (gross profit) and its sales. It then combines these measurements and places each menu item into one of four classifications. Puzzle Plow Horse Star Dog 12/2/2018 HRT383
7
Selling Price – Food Cost = Contributing Margin
Determine the contributing margin (CM) of each item CM same as item’s Gross Profit Use total food cost (include garnish, accompaniments served with entrée such as salad, potatoes, rolls, butter etc.). Selling Price – Food Cost = Contributing Margin One point to understand before delving into menu engineering is the theory of contributing margins. 12/2/2018 HRT383
8
Contribution Margin Dollars vs. Food Cost Percentage
Sirloin Pasta Coffee Selling Price $22.00 $18.00 $2.00 Cost $10.36 $4.54 $0.19 Food Cost % 47.09% 25.22% 9.5% Cont. Margin $ $11.64 $13.46 $1.81 Note: Relationship between food cost % and contribution margin in $ is not consistent. An item that has a high contribution margin in $ does not necessarily have a low food cost %. Too often, management is led to believe that low food cost % are the primary objective. Not so, you can’t take % to the bank, you take money. 12/2/2018 HRT383
9
Contribution Margin Dollars vs. Food Cost Percentage
Sirloin Pasta Coffee Selling Price $22.00 $18.00 $2.00 Cost $10.36 $4.54 $0.19 Food Cost % 47.09% 25.22% 9.5% Cont. Margin $ $11.64 $13.46 $1.81 Note: Relationship between food cost % and contribution margin in $ is not consistent. An item that has a high contribution margin in $ does not necessarily have a low food cost %. Too often, management is led to believe that low food cost % are the primary objective. Not so, you can’t take % to the bank, you take money. 12/2/2018 HRT383
10
Data Trap Spring ‘08 See Lunch Hand Out 12/2/2018 HRT383
11
Desserts 12/2/2018 HRT383 Menu Plate F/C Contri- bution Quan- tity Net
Menu Plate F/C Contri- bution Quan- tity Net Total Popu- larity MENU ITEM Price Cost % Margin Sold Income Engineering RKR Apple Crisp 5.00 2.02 40.40% 2.98 65 325.00 131.30 44.83% Sampler 1.71 34.20% 3.29 27 135.00 46.17 18.62% Choc Bread Pudding 1.70 34.00% 3.30 20 100.00 34.00 13.79% Crème Brulee 0.45 9.00% 4.55 33 165.00 14.85 22.76% TOTAL DESSERTS 31.22% 3.44 145 725.00 226.32 12/2/2018 HRT383
12
Popularity Average Popularity
80% of the average item sales per Dessert: 100 / 4 X 80% = 20% 12/2/2018 HRT383
13
Desserts 12/2/2018 HRT383 Menu Plate F/C Contri- bution Quan- tity Net
Menu Plate F/C Contri- bution Quan- tity Net Total Popu- larity MENU ITEM Price Cost % Margin Sold Income Engineering RKR Apple Crisp 5.00 2.02 40.40% 2.98 65 325.00 131.30 44.83% Sampler 1.71 34.20% 3.29 27 135.00 46.17 18.62% Choc Bread Pudding 1.70 34.00% 3.30 20 100.00 34.00 13.79% Crème Brulee 0.45 9.00% 4.55 33 165.00 14.85 22.76% TOTAL DESSERTS 31.22% 3.44 145 725.00 226.32 20% 12/2/2018 HRT383
14
HRT383 Lunch Desserts 100% Plowhorse Star Dog Puzzle Popularity 20%
In the example; CHICKEN would be dropped from the menu, while the FILET would be promoted more heavily. The prices on the BEEF and the TURKEY might be raised a little and featured more visibly on the menu. 20% 12/2/2018 Contribution Margin $3.44 HRT383
15
HRT383 Lunch Desserts 100% Plowhorse * Apple Crisp $2.98/44.83% Star
* Crème Brulee $4.55/22.76% * Sampler $3.29/18.62% * Choc BP $3.30/13.79% Dog Puzzle Popularity In the example; CHICKEN would be dropped from the menu, while the FILET would be promoted more heavily. The prices on the BEEF and the TURKEY might be raised a little and featured more visibly on the menu. 20% 12/2/2018 Contribution Margin $3.44 HRT383
16
Desserts Dog Star Plow Horse 12/2/2018 HRT383 Menu Plate F/C Contri-
Menu Plate F/C Contri- bution Quan- tity Net Total Popu- larity MENU ITEM Price Cost % Margin Sold Income Engineering RKR Apple Crisp 5.00 2.02 40.40% 2.98 65 325.00 131.30 44.83% Plow Horse Sampler 1.71 34.20% 3.29 27 135.00 46.17 18.62% Dog Choc Bread Pudding 1.70 34.00% 3.30 20 100.00 34.00 13.79% Crème Brulee 0.45 9.00% 4.55 33 165.00 14.85 22.76% Star TOTAL DESSERTS 31.22% 3.44 145 725.00 226.32 20% 12/2/2018 HRT383
17
The Four Key Menu Categories
Plowhorses are items that are relatively popular but have a high contribution margin. Items in this category can have their menu prices increased or the portion size cut in a attempt to increase CM. If market is price resistant Stars have both high popularity and high CM Puzzles have relatively low popularity and high margins; lower price. Dogs are both low in popularity and CM; eliminate Plowhorses If the market does not resist the price increase, this action will move a plowhorse into the star category. If market is price resistant, the item can be buried in a inconspicuous place on the menu in the knowledge that people will find these relative bargains anyway. Stars It may be possible to increase menu price and/or cut portion size to increase profits while maintaining volume Puzzles They need to be promoted more to stimulate sales. Dogs Prime candidates to be dropped from the menu. In the example; CHICKEN would be dropped from the menu, while the FILET would be promoted more heavily. The prices on the BEEF and the TURKEY might be raised a little and featured more visibly on the menu. 12/2/2018 HRT383
18
HRT383 Lunch Desserts Increase $ Cut Portion ? Eliminate? 100%
Plowhorse * Apple Crisp $2.98/44.83% Star * Crème Brulee $4.55/22.76% * Sampler $3.29/18.62% * Choc BP $3.30/13.79% Dog Puzzle Increase $ Cut Portion ? Popularity In the example; CHICKEN would be dropped from the menu, while the FILET would be promoted more heavily. The prices on the BEEF and the TURKEY might be raised a little and featured more visibly on the menu. 20% Eliminate? 12/2/2018 Contribution Margin $3.44 HRT383
19
Data Trap Spring ‘08 See Lunch Hand Out for Main Courses 12/2/2018
HRT383
20
Lunch Main Courses 12/2/2018 HRT383 MENU ITEM Chinese Chix Salad 10.00
Menu Plate Contribution Quantity Net Total Popularity MENU ITEM Price Cost % Margin Sold Income Engineering Chinese Chix Salad 10.00 2.12 21.20% 7.88 26 260.00 55.12 6.47% SouthWestern Salad 2.03 20.30% 7.97 29 290.00 58.87 7.21% Cobb Salad 2.91 29.10% 7.09 75.66 Caesar Salad 8.00 1.58 19.75% 6.42 9 72.00 14.22 2.24% 5.97% Caesar Salad w/ Chicken 2.58 25.80% 7.42 11 110.00 28.38 2.74% Caesar Salad with Shrimp 3.08 30.80% 6.92 4 40.00 12.32 1.00% Cheese Quesadilla 3.14 39.25% 4.86 38 304.00 119.32 9.45% 13.18% Quesadilla with Chicken 4.73 47.30% 5.27 8 80.00 37.84 1.99% Quesadilla with Shrimp 5.02 50.20% 4.98 7 70.00 35.14 1.74% Fish Tacos 3.07 30.70% 6.93 380.00 116.66 Burger 9.00 2.44 27.11% 6.56 36 324.00 87.84 8.96% Turkado 2.42 30.25% 5.58 51 408.00 123.42 12.69% Ravioli 2.81 31.22% 6.19 43 387.00 120.83 10.70% Halibut 12.00 3.02 25.17% 8.98 58 696.00 175.16 14.43% Steak 3.81 31.75% 8.19 18 216.00 68.58 4.48% SUBTOTAL MAIN DISHES 28.98% 6.88 402 3,897.00 12/2/2018 HRT383
21
Popularity Average Popularity
80% of the average item sales per Main Dishes: 100 / 11 X 80% = 7.27% 12/2/2018 HRT383
22
Lunch Main Courses 7.27% 12/2/2018 HRT383 MENU ITEM Chinese Chix Salad
Menu Plate Contribution Quantity Net Total Popularity MENU ITEM Price Cost % Margin Sold Income Engineering Chinese Chix Salad 10.00 2.12 21.20% 7.88 26 260.00 55.12 6.47% SouthWestern Salad 2.03 20.30% 7.97 29 290.00 58.87 7.21% Cobb Salad 2.91 29.10% 7.09 75.66 Caesar Salad 8.00 1.58 19.75% 6.42 9 72.00 14.22 2.24% 5.97% Caesar Salad w/ Chicken 2.58 25.80% 7.42 11 110.00 28.38 2.74% Caesar Salad with Shrimp 3.08 30.80% 6.92 4 40.00 12.32 1.00% Cheese Quesadilla 3.14 39.25% 4.86 38 304.00 119.32 9.45% 13.18% Quesadilla with Chicken 4.73 47.30% 5.27 8 80.00 37.84 1.99% Quesadilla with Shrimp 5.02 50.20% 4.98 7 70.00 35.14 1.74% Fish Tacos 3.07 30.70% 6.93 380.00 116.66 Burger 9.00 2.44 27.11% 6.56 36 324.00 87.84 8.96% Turkado 2.42 30.25% 5.58 51 408.00 123.42 12.69% Ravioli 2.81 31.22% 6.19 43 387.00 120.83 10.70% Halibut 12.00 3.02 25.17% 8.98 58 696.00 175.16 14.43% Steak 3.81 31.75% 8.19 18 216.00 68.58 4.48% SUBTOTAL MAIN DISHES 28.98% 6.88 402 3,897.00 7.27% 12/2/2018 HRT383
23
Exercise Please work with your fellow students and come up with suggestions/decisions. 12/2/2018 HRT383
24
HRT383 Lunch Main Courses 100% Plowhorse Star Dog Puzzle Popularity
In the example; CHICKEN would be dropped from the menu, while the FILET would be promoted more heavily. The prices on the BEEF and the TURKEY might be raised a little and featured more visibly on the menu. 7.27% 12/2/2018 Contribution Margin $6.88 HRT383
25
Lunch Main Courses 12/2/2018 HRT383 MENU ITEM Chinese Chix Salad 10.00
Menu Plate Contribution Quantity Net Total Popularity MENU ITEM Price Cost % Margin Sold Income Engineering Chinese Chix Salad 10.00 2.12 21.20% 7.88 26 260.00 55.12 6.47% SouthWestern Salad 2.03 20.30% 7.97 29 290.00 58.87 7.21% Cobb Salad 2.91 29.10% 7.09 75.66 Caesar Salad 8.00 1.58 19.75% 6.42 9 72.00 14.22 2.24% 5.97% Caesar Salad with Chicken 2.58 25.80% 7.42 11 110.00 28.38 2.74% Caesar Salad with Shrimp 3.08 30.80% 6.92 4 40.00 12.32 1.00% Cheese Quesadilla 3.14 39.25% 4.86 38 304.00 119.32 9.45% 13.18% Quesadilla with Chicken 4.73 47.30% 5.27 8 80.00 37.84 1.99% Quesadilla with Shrimp 5.02 50.20% 4.98 7 70.00 35.14 1.74% Fish Tacos 3.07 30.70% 6.93 380.00 116.66 Burger 9.00 2.44 27.11% 6.56 36 324.00 87.84 8.96% Turkado 2.42 30.25% 5.58 51 408.00 123.42 12.69% Ravioli 2.81 31.22% 6.19 43 387.00 120.83 10.70% Halibut 12.00 3.02 25.17% 8.98 58 696.00 175.16 14.43% Steak 3.81 31.75% 8.19 18 216.00 68.58 4.48% SUBTOTAL MAIN DISHES 28.98% 6.88 402 3,897.00 7.27% 12/2/2018 HRT383
26
Please on Menu Categories and make recommendations for Menu changes
Group Work Please on Menu Categories and make recommendations for Menu changes
27
Lunch Main Courses 12/2/2018 HRT383 MENU ITEM Chinese Chix Salad 10.00
Menu Plate Contribution Quantity Net Total Popularity MENU ITEM Price Cost % Margin Sold Income Engineering Chinese Chix Salad 10.00 2.12 21.20% 7.88 26 260.00 55.12 6.47% Puzzle SouthWestern Salad 2.03 20.30% 7.97 29 290.00 58.87 7.21% Cobb Salad 2.91 29.10% 7.09 75.66 Caesar Salad 8.00 1.58 19.75% 6.42 9 72.00 14.22 2.24% 5.97% Caesar Salad with Chicken 2.58 25.80% 7.42 11 110.00 28.38 2.74% Caesar Salad with Shrimp 3.08 30.80% 6.92 4 40.00 12.32 1.00% Cheese Quesadilla 3.14 39.25% 4.86 38 304.00 119.32 9.45% 13.18% Quesadilla with Chicken 4.73 47.30% 5.27 8 80.00 37.84 1.99% Plow Horse Quesadilla with Shrimp 5.02 50.20% 4.98 7 70.00 35.14 1.74% Fish Tacos 3.07 30.70% 6.93 380.00 116.66 Star Burger 9.00 2.44 27.11% 6.56 36 324.00 87.84 8.96% Turkado 2.42 30.25% 5.58 51 408.00 123.42 12.69% Ravioli 2.81 31.22% 6.19 43 387.00 120.83 10.70% Halibut 12.00 3.02 25.17% 8.98 58 696.00 175.16 14.43% Steak 3.81 31.75% 8.19 18 216.00 68.58 4.48% SUBTOTAL MAIN DISHES 28.98% 6.88 402 3,897.00 7.27% 12/2/2018 HRT383
28
The Four Key Menu Categories
Plowhorses are items that are relatively popular but have a high contribution margin. Items in this category can have their menu prices increased or the portion size cut in a attempt to increase CM. If market is price resistant Stars have both high popularity and high CM Puzzles have relatively low popularity and high margins; lower price. Dogs are both low in popularity and CM; eliminate Plowhorses If the market does not resist the price increase, this action will move a plowhorse into the star category. If market is price resistant, the item can be buried in a inconspicuous place on the menu in the knowledge that people will find these relative bargains anyway. Stars It may be possible to increase menu price and/or cut portion size to increase profits while maintaining volume Puzzles They need to be promoted more to stimulate sales. Dogs Prime candidates to be dropped from the menu. In the example; CHICKEN would be dropped from the menu, while the FILET would be promoted more heavily. The prices on the BEEF and the TURKEY might be raised a little and featured more visibly on the menu. 12/2/2018 HRT383
29
Increase Menu $ or Reduce Portion
MENU ITEM Menu Engineering Recommendations? Chinese Chix Salad PUZZLE Lower $? South Western Salad Cobb Salad Caesar Salad Caesar Salad with Chicken Caesar Salad with Shrimp Cheese Quesadilla Quesadilla with Chicken PLOW HORSE Increase Menu $ or Reduce Portion Quesadilla with Shrimp Fish Tacos STAR Burger Turkado Ravioli Halibut Steak Main Courses 12/2/2018 HRT383
30
Up Selling Manager’s Special 12/2/2018 HRT383
31
Placement Two Schools of thought Menu Sequence Focal Points
Menu should follow progression of meal Focal Points Use focal points on the menu to push certain menu items 12/2/2018 HRT383
32
Focal Points Focal Point Single Sheet Menu Twofold Menu 12/2/2018
HRT383
33
Focal Points 2 3 4 5 Focal Point Threefold Menu 12/2/2018 HRT383
34
Specials Larger Bolder type than the rest of menu Longer description
Concept of Closure people’s eyes are drawn to what ever is enclosed by a box Color, illustration, and/or pictures, bullets can be used to draw attention to signature items. 12/2/2018 HRT383
35
Branding Fast food Coke / Pepsi TGIF Jack Daniels 12/2/2018 HRT383
36
Menu Pricing Odd-Cents pricing Price rounding. Placement
Majority of prices end in either a “5” or a “9” Price rounding. Within certain price bands, price increases have little negative impact on customers Placement 12/2/2018 HRT383
37
Price Placement BAKED CHICKEN Tender pieces of chicken breast $8.99
LEMON SOLE Fresh filets sautéed with lemon caper sauce $11.99 LAMB STEAK Center cut of lamb served on a bed of rice $12.99 SWORDFISH STEAK Charcoal grilled served with beurre blanc $14.99 Baked Chicken……….$8.99 Lemon Sole………….$11.99 Lamb Steak………….$12.99 Swordfish Steak…..…$14.99 12/2/2018 HRT383
38
Price Placement BAKED CHICKEN Tender pieces of chicken breast
Eight dollars and ninety nine cents LEMON SOLE Fresh filets sautéed with lemon caper sauce Eleven dollars and ninety nine cents LAMB STEAK Center cut of lamb served on a bed of rice Twelve dollars and ninety nine cents SWORDFISH STEAK Charcoal grilled served with beurre blanc Fourteen dollars and ninety nine cents 12/2/2018 HRT383
39
Conclusion Menu analysis is important
If demographic studies, internal capacities, cost cards, and markups have been executed correctly, the score should be a good one Analysis should be done using either the Smith or the Hurst methods to ascertain the profitability of the menu If the analysis shows a poor menu, make improvements Good menu: first step has been taken toward running a profitable operation. It’s just that simple 12/2/2018 HRT383
40
Where to Get More Information
Mill, Robert Christie (1998) Restaurant Management: Customers, operations, and employees / Menu Scoring & Menu Engineering, pp Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall. Drysdale, John A. & Jennifer Adams Aldrich (2002). Profitable menu planning / Chapter 5: Menu Analysis, pp rd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall, TX911.3.M45 D CD-ROM TX911.3.M45 D Most Menu & F&B Management Books 12/2/2018 HRT383
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.