Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Improving Pulsar Timing

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Improving Pulsar Timing"— Presentation transcript:

1 Improving Pulsar Timing
Willem van Straten George Hobbs, Rick Jenet

2 Why? Gravitational Wave detection/sensitivity
MSPs binary system dynamics Astrometry: Solar System Ephemeris Earth Wobble Terrestrial Time Timing Noise (incl. glitches)

3 EPTA (Effelsberg/ Westerbork/ Jodrell Bank) ~30 115 MHz – 8GHz ~1us
Observatory Number of pulsars Observing span (yr) System Observing frequency Rms Jodrell Bank ~600 0-35 FB MHz >10us Parkes msps 15 ~10 CD 1.4GHz, 3GHz >100ns Parkes young 114 1.4GHz PPTA 20 2 CD/DFB/CORR 600MHz, 1.4/3 GHz Arecibo 7 ~20 0.4/1.4/2.4GHz >200ns Greenbank EPTA (Effelsberg/ Westerbork/ Jodrell Bank) ~30 115 MHz – 8GHz ~1us Nancay ~1.4GHz ~500ns Urumqi 284 10 1.5GHz >100us Hartebeesthoek 30 1.6/2.3GHz GMRT 1 ( ) FB/CD 325/610 MHz G. Hobbs

4 How? Precision (Noise) Software/Modeling Accuracy (Systematics)
Numerical Precision Arrival Time Estimation Time Standard Precision (Noise) Polarimetric Calibration Interstellar Scintillation Earth Wobble Accuracy (Systematics) RFI Mitigation Solar System Ephemeris Solar Wind Earth Atmosphere DM Variation Clock Correction Time/Freq Resolution Sensitivity Hardware/Instrumentation

5 Modelling Software (tempo2)
Clock Corrections Physical Delays: Solar System Ephemeris (incl. Shapiro delay) Earth Wobble precession & nutation (40ns) polar motion (60ns) Atmospheric Delays troposphere (20ns) ionosphere (1ns)

6

7 RFI mitigation using an adaptive filter
Kesteven et al. (2004)

8 Interstellar Scintillation
Figure 1, Walker & Stinebring (2005)

9 Arrival Time Estimation
Frequency domain (Taylor 1992) Multi-component Gaussian (Kramer et al. 1994) Invariant interval (Britton et al. 2000) Full polarization (van Straten 2004) Time vs. frequency domain (Hotan et al. 2005) Higher order moments (Jenet & Hobbs 2005)

10 Full Polarization TOA Useful for timing? (Kramer et al. 1999)
Stokes Q, U, V often sharper than Stokes I Useful for timing? (Kramer et al. 1999)

11 PSR J

12 PSR J

13 PSR B

14 PSR J

15 Formalism van Straten (2004)

16 Simulation Position Angle of Linear Polarization:
Gaussian Total Intensity Profile with Width, w Constant Degree of Polarization, p Measurement noise, n

17

18 PSR J 1.1

19 PSR J 1.0

20 PSR B 1.4

21 PSR J 1.6

22

23 PSR J

24 PSR J

25 PSR B

26 PSR J

27 Results Pulsar Benefit Systematic J0437-4715 1.11(1) 300 ns 1713+0747
0.99(6) 35 ns B 1.4(3) 30 ns 1.56(8) 400 ns

28 Conclusion Effectiveness varies by pulsar To do:
Full Polarization TOA holds promise Effectiveness varies by pulsar To do: Produce/acquire well-calibrated, high S/N polarimetric pulse profile (standards) Run simulations Improve arrival time estimates


Download ppt "Improving Pulsar Timing"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google