Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Signal BW and RX Filter BW (1)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Signal BW and RX Filter BW (1)"— Presentation transcript:

1 CC112x Feedback to PLL - Extending RX filter BW without increasing noise BW

2 Signal BW and RX Filter BW (1)
Assume 5 kbps and ±2.5 kHz frequency deviation and no frequency offset between RX and TX What is the signal bandwidth? What is the minimum required RX filter BW? Receiver channel filter BW IF = RF - LO RF Frequency Frequency offset SBW = Symbol Rate + 2·freq dev LO Frequency

3 Signal BW and RX Filter BW (2)
Assume 5 kbps, ±2.5 kHz frequency deviation, +/-10 ppm crystal tolerance in TX and RX, and 868 MHz operation What is the signal bandwidth? What is the minimum required RX filter BW? What is the theoretical degradation in sensitivity compared to using minimum RX filter BW (no frequency offset)? Receiver channel filter BW IF = RF - LO -X ppm +X ppm Wider RX filter bandwidth: Reduced sensitivity and close-in selectivity Temperature compensation might not be neccessary Allows cheaper (i.e. less accurate) crystal to be used If the RX filter BW changes by a factor X, the theoretical sensitivity changes by 10log(X) RF Frequency -2·X ppm +2·X ppm Frequency offset -X ppm +X ppm RX BW > SBW + 4·Xppm·RF LO Frequency

4 Measurement Results 5 kbps, ±2.5 kHz frequency deviation and 12.5 kHz RX filter BW 5 kbps, ±2.5 kHz frequency deviation and 50 kHz RX filter BW If the RX filter BW changes by a factor X, the theoretical sensitivity changes by 10log(X) Theory matches measurements in this case! 12.5 kHz 50 kHz dBm dBm

5 Crystal Accuracy

6 Feedback to PLL (1) Extends RX filter BW without increasing noise bandwidth FREQOFF_CFG = 0x30 RX filter BW extended by ±BW/4 Program 50 kHz Effective BW is 75 kHz Programmed RX filter BW = noise BW IF = RF - LO -X ppm +X ppm RF Frequency Negative Offset No offset Positive Offset Extended RX filter -X ppm +X ppm LO Frequency

7 Crystal Accuracy

8 50 kHz No feedback to PLL 50 kHz and feedback to PLL

9 Feedback to PLL (2) Assume 5 kbps, ±2.5 kHz frequency deviation, +/-10 ppm crystal tolerance,868 MHz operation, and using feedback to PLL What is the minimum required RX filter BW? What is the theoretical degradation in sensitivity compared to using 12.5 kHz RX filter BW (no offset case)? What is the theoretical improvement in sensitivity compared to using 50 kHz RX filter BW (no feedback to PLL case)? 12.5 kHz 33.3 kHz 50 kHz dBm dBm dBm

10 50 kHz No feedback to PLL 33.3 kHz and feedback to PLL


Download ppt "Signal BW and RX Filter BW (1)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google