Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Professor Ronald L. Carter

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Professor Ronald L. Carter"— Presentation transcript:

1 Professor Ronald L. Carter ronc@uta.edu http://www.uta.edu/ronc/
Semiconductor Device Modeling and Characterization EE5342, Lecture 3-Spring 2003 Professor Ronald L. Carter L3 January 21

2 First Assignment Send e-mail to ronc@uta.edu
On the subject line, put “5342 ” In the body of message include address: ______________________ Last Name*: _______________________ First Name*: _______________________ Last four digits of your Student ID: _____ * As it appears in the UTA Record - no more, no less L3 January 21

3 Semiconductor Electronics - concepts thus far
Conduction and Valence states due to symmetry of lattice “Free-elec.” dynamics near band edge Band Gap direct or indirect effective mass in curvature Thermal carrier generation Chemical carrier gen (donors/accept) L3 January 21

4 Counting carriers - quantum density of states function
1 dim electron wave #s range for n+1 “atoms” is 2p/L < k < 2p/a where a is “interatomic” distance and L = na is the length of the assembly (k = 2p/l) Shorter ls, would “oversample” if n increases by 1, dp is h/L Extn 3D: E = p2/2m = h2k2/2m so a vol of p-space of 4pp2dp has h3/LxLyLz L3 January 21

5 QM density of states (cont.)
So density of states, gc(E) is (Vol in p-sp)/(Vol per state*V) = 4pp2dp/[(h3/LxLyLz)*V] Noting that p2 = 2mE, this becomes gc(E) = {4p(2mn*)3/2/h3}(E-Ec)1/2 and E - Ec = h2k2/2mn* Similar for the hole states where Ev - E = h2k2/2mp* L3 January 21

6 Fermi-Dirac distribution fctn
The probability of an electron having an energy, E, is given by the F-D distr fF(E) = {1+exp[(E-EF)/kT]}-1 Note: fF (EF) = 1/2 EF is the equilibrium energy of the system The sum of the hole probability and the electron probability is 1 L3 January 21

7 Fermi-Dirac DF (continued)
So the probability of a hole having energy E is 1 - fF(E) At T = 0 K, fF (E) becomes a step function and 0 probability of E > EF At T >> 0 K, there is a finite probability of E >> EF L3 January 21

8 Maxwell-Boltzman Approximation
fF(E) = {1+exp[(E-EF)/kT]}-1 For E - EF > 3 kT, the exp > 20, so within a 5% error, fF(E) ~ exp[-(E-EF)/kT] This is the MB distribution function MB used when E-EF>75 meV (T=300K) For electrons when Ec - EF > 75 meV and for holes when EF - Ev > 75 meV L3 January 21

9 Electron Conc. in the MB approx.
Assuming the MB approx., the equilibrium electron concentration is L3 January 21

10 Electron and Hole Conc in MB approx
Similarly, the equilibrium hole concentration is po = Nv exp[-(EF-Ev)/kT] So that nopo = NcNv exp[-Eg/kT] ni2 = nopo, Nc,v = 2{2pm*n,pkT/h2}3/2 Nc = 2.8E19/cm3, Nv = 1.04E19/cm3 and ni = 1E10/cm3 L3 January 21

11 Calculating the equilibrium no
The ideal is to calculate the equilibrium electron concentration no for the FD distribution, where fF(E) = {1+exp[(E-EF)/kT]}-1 gc(E) = [4p(2mn*)3/2(E-Ec)1/2]/h3 L3 January 21

12 Equilibrium con- centration for no
Earlier quoted the MB approximation no = Nc exp[-(Ec - EF)/kT],(=Nc exp hF) The exact solution is no = 2NcF1/2(hF)/p1/2 Where F1/2(hF) is the Fermi integral of order 1/2, and hF = (EF - Ec)/kT Error in no, e, is smaller than for the DF: e = 31%, 12%, 5% for -hF = 0, 1, 2 L3 January 21

13 Equilibrium con- centration for po
Earlier quoted the MB approximation po = Nv exp[-(EF - Ev)/kT],(=Nv exp h’F) The exact solution is po = 2NvF1/2(h’F)/p1/2 Note: F1/2(0) = 0.678, (p1/2/2) = 0.886 Where F1/2(h’F) is the Fermi integral of order 1/2, and h’F = (Ev - EF)/kT Errors are the same as for po L3 January 21

14 Degenerate and nondegenerate cases
Bohr-like doping model assumes no interaction between dopant sites If adjacent dopant atoms are within 2 Bohr radii, then orbits overlap This happens when Nd ~ Nc (EF ~ Ec), or when Na ~ Nv (EF ~ Ev) The degenerate semiconductor is defined by EF ~/> Ec or EF ~/< Ev L3 January 21

15 Donor ionization The density of elec trapped at donors is nd = Nd/{1+[exp((Ed-EF)/kT)/2]} Similar to FD DF except for factor of 2 due to degeneracy (4 for holes) Furthermore nd = Nd - Nd+, also For a shallow donor, can have Ed-EF >> kT AND Ec-EF >> kT: Typically EF-Ed ~ 2kT L3 January 21

16 Donor ionization (continued)
Further, if Ed - EF > 2kT, then nd ~ 2Nd exp[-(Ed-EF)/kT], e < 5% If the above is true, Ec - EF > 4kT, so no ~ Nc exp[-(Ec-EF)/kT], e < 2% Consequently the fraction of un-ionized donors is nd/no = 2Nd exp[(Ec-Ed)/kT]/Nc = 0.4% for Nd(P) = 1e16/cm3 L3 January 21

17 Classes of semiconductors
Intrinsic: no = po = ni, since Na&Nd << ni =[NcNvexp(Eg/kT)]1/2,(not easy to get) n-type: no > po, since Nd > Na p-type: no < po, since Nd < Na Compensated: no=po=ni, w/ Na- = Nd+ > 0 Note: n-type and p-type are usually partially compensated since there are usually some opposite- type dopants L3 January 21

18 Equilibrium concentrations
Charge neutrality requires q(po + Nd+) + (-q)(no + Na-) = 0 Assuming complete ionization, so Nd+ = Nd and Na- = Na Gives two equations to be solved simultaneously 1. Mass action, no po = ni2, and 2. Neutrality po + Nd = no + Na L3 January 21

19 Equilibrium conc n-type
For Nd > Na Let N = Nd-Na, and (taking the + root) no = (N)/2 + {[N/2]2+ni2}1/2 For Nd+= Nd >> ni >> Na we have no = Nd, and po = ni2/Nd L3 January 21

20 Equilibrium conc p-type
For Na > Nd Let N = Nd-Na, and (taking the + root) po = (-N)/2 + {[-N/2]2+ni2}1/2 For Na-= Na >> ni >> Nd we have po = Na, and no = ni2/Na L3 January 21

21 Electron Conc. in the MB approx.
Assuming the MB approx., the equilibrium electron concentration is L3 January 21

22 Hole Conc in MB approx Similarly, the equilibrium hole concentration is po = Nv exp[-(EF-Ev)/kT] So that nopo = NcNv exp[-Eg/kT] ni2 = nopo, Nc,v = 2{2pm*n,pkT/h2}3/2 Nc = 2.8E19/cm3, Nv = 1.04E19/cm3 and ni = 1E10/cm3 L3 January 21

23 Position of the Fermi Level
Efi is the Fermi level when no = po Ef shown is a Fermi level for no > po Ef < Efi when no < po Efi < (Ec + Ev)/2, which is the mid-band L3 January 21

24 EF relative to Ec and Ev Inverting no = Nc exp[-(Ec-EF)/kT] gives Ec - EF = kT ln(Nc/no) For n-type material: Ec - EF =kTln(Nc/Nd)=kTln[(NcPo)/ni2] Inverting po = Nv exp[-(EF-Ev)/kT] gives EF - Ev = kT ln(Nv/po) For p-type material: EF - Ev = kT ln(Nv/Na) L3 January 21

25 EF relative to Efi Letting ni = no gives  Ef = Efi ni = Nc exp[-(Ec-Efi)/kT], so Ec - Efi = kT ln(Nc/ni). Thus EF - Efi = kT ln(no/ni) and for n-type EF - Efi = kT ln(Nd/ni) Likewise Efi - EF = kT ln(po/ni) and for p-type Efi - EF = kT ln(Na/ni) L3 January 21

26 Locating Efi in the bandgap
Since Ec - Efi = kT ln(Nc/ni), and Efi - Ev = kT ln(Nv/ni) The sum of the two equations gives Efi = (Ec + Ev)/2 - (kT/2) ln(Nc/Nv) Since Nc = 2.8E19cm-3 > 1.04E19cm-3 = Nv, the intrinsic Fermi level lies below the middle of the band gap L3 January 21

27 Sample calculations Efi = (Ec + Ev)/2 - (kT/2) ln(Nc/Nv), so at 300K, kT = meV and Nc/Nv = 2.8/1.04, Efi is 12.8 meV or 1.1% below mid-band For Nd = 3E17cm-3, given that Ec - EF = kT ln(Nc/Nd), we have Ec - EF = meV ln(280/3), Ec - EF = eV =117meV ~3x(Ec - ED) what Nd gives Ec-EF =Ec/3 L3 January 21

28 Equilibrium electron conc. and energies
L3 January 21

29 Equilibrium hole conc. and energies
L3 January 21

30 vx = axt = (qEx/m*)t, and the displ
Carrier Mobility In an electric field, Ex, the velocity (since ax = Fx/m* = qEx/m*) is vx = axt = (qEx/m*)t, and the displ x = (qEx/m*)t2/2 If every tcoll, a collision occurs which “resets” the velocity to <vx(tcoll)> = 0, then <vx> = qExtcoll/m* = mEx L3 January 21

31 Carrier mobility (cont.)
The response function m is the mobility. The mean time between collisions, tcoll, may has several important causal events: Thermal vibrations, donor- or acceptor-like traps and lattice imperfections to name a few. Hence mthermal = qtthermal/m*, etc. L3 January 21

32 Carrier mobility (cont.)
If the rate of a single contribution to the scattering is 1/ti, then the total scattering rate, 1/tcoll is L3 January 21

33 Drift Current The drift current density (amp/cm2) is given by the point form of Ohm Law J = (nqmn+pqmp)(Exi+ Eyj+ Ezk), so J = (sn + sp)E = sE, where s = nqmn+pqmp defines the conductivity The net current is L3 January 21

34 Drift current resistance
Given: a semiconductor resistor with length, l, and cross-section, A. What is the resistance? As stated previously, the conductivity, s = nqmn + pqmp So the resistivity, r = 1/s = 1/(nqmn + pqmp) L3 January 21

35 Drift current resistance (cont.)
Consequently, since R = rl/A R = (nqmn + pqmp)-1(l/A) For n >> p, (an n-type extrinsic s/c) R = l/(nqmnA) For p >> n, (a p-type extrinsic s/c) R = l/(pqmpA) L3 January 21

36 Drift current resistance (cont.)
Note: for an extrinsic semiconductor and multiple scattering mechanisms, since R = l/(nqmnA) or l/(pqmpA), and (mn or p total)-1 = S mi-1, then Rtotal = S Ri (series Rs) The individual scattering mechanisms are: Lattice, ionized impurity, etc. L3 January 21

37 Exp. mobility model function for Si1
Parameter As P B mmin mmax Nref e e e17 a L3 January 21

38 Exp. mobility model for P, As and B in Si
L3 January 21

39 Carrier mobility functions (cont.)
The parameter mmax models 1/tlattice the thermal collision rate The parameters mmin, Nref and a model 1/timpur the impurity collision rate The function is approximately of the ideal theoretical form: 1/mtotal = 1/mthermal + 1/mimpurity L3 January 21

40 Carrier mobility functions (ex.)
Let Nd = 1.78E17/cm3 of phosphorous, so mmin = 68.5, mmax = 1414, Nref = 9.20e16 and a = Thus mn = 586 cm2/V-s Let Na = 5.62E17/cm3 of boron, so mmin = 44.9, mmax = 470.5, Nref = 9.68e16 and a = Thus mn = 189 cm2/V-s L3 January 21

41 Lattice mobility The mlattice is the lattice scattering mobility due to thermal vibrations Simple theory gives mlattice ~ T-3/2 Experimentally mn,lattice ~ T-n where n = 2.42 for electrons and 2.2 for holes Consequently, the model equation is mlattice(T) = mlattice(300)(T/300)-n L3 January 21

42 Ionized impurity mobility function
The mimpur is the scattering mobility due to ionized impurities Simple theory gives mimpur ~ T3/2/Nimpur Consequently, the model equation is mimpur(T) = mimpur(300)(T/300)3/2 L3 January 21

43 Net silicon (ex- trinsic) resistivity
Since r = s-1 = (nqmn + pqmp)-1 The net conductivity can be obtained by using the model equation for the mobilities as functions of doping concentrations. The model function gives agreement with the measured s(Nimpur) L3 January 21

44 Net silicon extr resistivity (cont.)
L3 January 21

45 Net silicon extr resistivity (cont.)
Since r = (nqmn + pqmp)-1, and mn > mp, (m = qt/m*) we have rp > rn Note that since 1.6(high conc.) < rp/rn < 3(low conc.), so 1.6(high conc.) < mn/mp < 3(low conc.) L3 January 21

46 Net silicon (com- pensated) res.
For an n-type (n >> p) compensated semiconductor, r = (nqmn)-1 But now n = N = Nd - Na, and the mobility must be considered to be determined by the total ionized impurity scattering Nd + Na = NI Consequently, a good estimate is r = (nqmn)-1 = [Nqmn(NI)]-1 L3 January 21

47 References 1Device Electronics for Integrated Circuits, 2 ed., by Muller and Kamins, Wiley, New York, 1986. 2Physics of Semiconductor Devices, by S. M. Sze, Wiley, New York, 1981. L3 January 21


Download ppt "Professor Ronald L. Carter"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google