Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Criticisms of Meta-Analysis

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Criticisms of Meta-Analysis"— Presentation transcript:

1 Criticisms of Meta-Analysis

2 Algera et al. Definition of rho
Predictor Criterion Population Model is for a single combination in a single population. Applied to multiple predictors, criteria, unspecified population(s). JAP, a meta-analysis

3 Criterion Measures Homogeneity of predictors and criteria
Supervisory ratings mostly Multidimensionality of criteria

4 Test of Situational Specificity
75 percent rule Unknown type I and type II error rates. Depends heavily on N/study Assumption that 25 percent is due to junk Q (chi-square) test Power depends on k Not worked out for corrected effect sizes

5 SS vs. VG Situational Specificity rejected if V(rho)=0.
Validity Generalizes if V(rho) >0 and CRLow > some value. What test (predictor)? What criterion? What population?

6 Meanings of Situation Outside the individual e.g., working conditions, pay for performance Nature of job performance, dimensionality, criterion factor structure (considered SS by SnH) Research design, e.g., time between measurements, reliability, range restriction, etc.

7 REVC is unsatisfactory
REVC represents unexplained variability in effect sizes Theory is all about explanation A good theory of, e.g., Situation, will result (ultimately) in a single estimate of rho.

8 Sharpe Apples & Oranges File Drawer GIGO, study rigor

9 Apples & Oranges Inclusion criteria Homogeneity test
Not really helpful The problem of moderators May be sig moderator even if overall Q is n.s. Quickly exhaust studies with multiple moderators

10 File Drawer Explain search for studies
Include published & unpublished studies, depending on study purpose Report correlation between sample size and effect size Calculate fail-safe N May not be very meaninful, tho, assume ES=0, but ES could be negative Use sophisticated bias detection methods, e.g., trim & fill

11 GIGO Are published studies really better? “Best-evidence” synthesis
Meta-analyze only the best studies Major disagreements about what ‘best’ means Code for features, e.g., random assignment, blind to condition

12 Other issues Conclusions of meta-analyses disagree
Premature closure of research areas


Download ppt "Criticisms of Meta-Analysis"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google