1. Update on Data Analysis
Generated 1M events of e + Pb208 collisions at 10  40 GeV/n with 1 < Q2 < 20, 0.3 < y < 0.95, parameter settings tuned by Mark, genShd = 3
After applying a cut, x < 0.002, about 38% of events left
Considered tagging using
evaporation neutrons
all neutrons
all combinations of neutron, proton, deuteron, and  multiplicities
true T(b) data for comparison
Regenerated input file for GEMC with 50 mrad rotation of all particles
Amy is running GEMC simulations
Generated 1M events of e + Pb208 collisions at 10  40 GeV/n with 1 < Q2 < 20, 0.01 < y < 0.95, parameter settings tuned by Mark, genShd = 1

2. Update on Data Analysis
Further analysis of the same data sample: 1 < Q2 < 20, 0.3 < y < 0.95, parameter settings tuned by Mark, genShd = 3
Considered tagging using
residual nucleus rigidity
A of residual nucleus

3. To Do
T(b) plots
try combining A with evaporation neutron multiplicity?
ratio of T(b) to that of evaporation neutrons to the 10/3 power
d plots
same as for T(b) but with x > 0.02 cut using the second data sample
T(b) plots using simulation data for particles detected after the downstream ion quad triplet
evaporation neutron multiplicity
total neutron multiplicity
evaporation proton multiplicity
total proton multiplicity
A of residual nucleus
rigidity of residual nucleus
d plots using simulation data for particles detected after the downstream ion quad triplet