Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
A Quick Look at the 2016 Water Level
Results and Other Aquifer Properties Southwest Kansas GMD #3 Annual Meeting March 9th, 2016 Geohydrology Section Kansas Geological Survey University of Kansas
2
The 2016 Cooperative Water Level Network
3
Average Change (by well)
Region 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 GMD #1 -0.11 0.53 -0.68 -0.39 -0.55 -0.72 -1.49 -0.99 0.18 -0.38 -0.73 -1.15 -0.27 -0.81 -1.24 -1.66 -0.67 -0.04 GMD #2 0.06 1.33 0.23 0.08 -0.82 -1.03 -0.46 -0.33 0.91 -0.17 -2.23 2.06 1.52 0.05 -0.87 -2.98 -1.68 2.81 -1.23 1.45 GMD #3 -0.49 -0.13 -0.84 -2.21 -1.99 -3.24 -1.88 -0.41 -2.41 -1.98 -2.95 -1.50 -3.17 -3.78 -3.56 -2.45 -2.15 GMD #4 -0.20 -0.23 -1.08 -0.47 -1.28 -0.48 -0.58 -0.28 -0.93 -0.50 -0.56 -1.38 -0.71 -0.43 GMD #5 0.87 1.04 -0.12 -0.08 -0.65 -1.56 -1.01 0.13 -1.18 3.14 0.57 0.62 -2.84 -1.85 -0.60 Entire Network 0.10 0.26 -1.90 -0.09 -0.70 -0.21 -2.11 -2.06 -0.86 -0.94 -0.37 Normal precipitation is just the average of the last 30 year decal period. The precipitation patterns in Kansas have a major influences on the both the landscape and associated land use in the state. *Results are based only on the cooperative network (KGS and KDA-DWR) and do not include sub-regional networks from the KDA-DWR, KGS, or local GMDs water levels are provisional. Kansas Geological Survey
4
Average Change (by well)
Normal precipitation is just the average of the last 30 year decal period. The precipitation patterns in Kansas have a major influences on the both the landscape and associated land use in the state. *Results are based only on the cooperative network (KGS and KDA-DWR) and do not include sub-regional networks from the KDA-DWR, KGS, or local GMDs water levels are provisional.
6
Percent Departure from Normal Precipitation
Source- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) 2015 Kansas Geological Survey
7
March 2015 June April July May August
8
Provisional Water Level Change, 2011 to 2016
9
Thomas County Index Well - Water Table Elevations
11
Velocity (ft/d) = Gradient
12
Velocity (ft/d) = Gradient * Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/d)
13
Velocity (ft/d) = Gradient
Velocity (ft/d) = Gradient * Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/d) / Specific Yield
14
Velocity (ft/d) = Gradient
Velocity (ft/d) = Gradient * Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/d) / Specific Yield 0.86 0.82 0.48 0.61 0.43 Average = 0.64 ft/d ≈ 234 ft/yr 22-23 years to go 1 mile.
15
Computed Pumping Velocities - Thomas County Index Well
0.6 ft/d 2.7 ft/d Pumping Rate 1000 gpm Initial Saturated Thickness 65 ft Hydraulic Conductivity 100 ft/d Specific Yield 15% 48 ft/d 1,040 ft/d
16
Kansas Geological Survey
Questions???? Kansas Geological Survey 1930 Constant Ave Lawrence, KS 66047 Thank You! Visit our site at
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.