1. An algorithm for evaluation of ENQA membership applications
Prof. György BAZSA, President
Hungarian Accreditation Committee,
ENQA – INQAAHE seminar
Paris, 28 May, 2009.

2. ENQA Board’s decision about QA membership
Application / accepted
Board
Decision: yes/no + 4C? + Report?
Action plan:
Obligatory?
Recommended?
Evaluated after 5 years?
Review committee ?
SER
Panel
Report
draft / final
QAA

3. Publicity of ENQA reviews via internet
Recommended / Obligatory / Not public
Event
ENQA homepage
QAA homepage
Review started O
SER R
Visit (date, panel)
Report (final)
Board’s decision
Action plan

4. ENQA should determine a code of behaviour for a successful site visit
We propose a code of contact during visits
Be well prepared in advance
Proper appearance (clothing etc.)
Shaking hands (if)
Personal introduction of both sides
Full attention to the meeting (no phone etc.)
Be equal partner
Never leave the meeting …

5. How to manage the meeting?
The meeting should be planned: chairing, raising questions, asking more information etc.
The meeting should be managed
Critical friends are asking friendly and critically
Names and positions on the table
Greeting and introduction in all cases
Be prepared whom to meet and what about
Raise concrete questions
Avoid hobby horses personal question
Ask for extra remarks of the interviewees
Provide a short summary
Thanks for coming
Keep the time schedule

6. How to share the work between review panel?
Panel members have equal rights, chair and secretary have extra duties, but the chair shouldn’t dominate the meeting
Distribute questions in advance, but raise actual ones too
Panel shouldn’t debate during the meeting, reach agreement before meeting
Each panel member should take notes
Panel members could chair several sessions
Chairing person should summarize at the end and then internally after the meeting